| Literature DB >> 33868040 |
Shamaila Mohsin1, Najia Atif2, Waqas Rabbani3, Ahmaren Tariq2, Shahzad Ali Khan4, Mahjabeen Tariq5, Siham Sikander2,4,6.
Abstract
Background: Evidence indicates that mental health issues like depression, epilepsy, and substance misuse can be detected with reasonable accuracy in resource-poor settings. The Community Informant Detection Tool (CIDT) is one such approach used for detecting mental health problems, including depression. We adapted this community informant approach for detecting maternal depression in Pakistan.Entities:
Keywords: Pakistan; Proactive Case Detection; community informant; cultural adaptation; detection tool; maternal depression
Year: 2021 PMID: 33868040 PMCID: PMC8047053 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.598857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants.
| DM 01 | 30 | 4 | M | 12 | Joint |
| DM 02 | 32 | 2 | M | 12 | Joint |
| DM 03 | 36 | 4 | M | 8 | Nuclear |
| DM 04 | 30 | 3 | M | 14 | Nuclear |
| DM 05 | 33 | 4 | M | 10 | Joint |
| DM 06 | 32 | 4 | M | 10 | Joint |
| RM 01 | 30 | 4 | M | 12 | Joint |
| RM 02 | 28 | 2 | M | 12 | Joint |
| RM 03 | 36 | 4 | M | 8 | Nuclear |
| RM 04 | 30 | 3 | M | 14 | Nuclear |
| RM 05 | 31 | 4 | M | 10 | Joint |
| MIL 01 | 49 | 4 | M | 5 | Joint |
| MIL 02 | 55 | 5 | M | 8 | Joint |
| MIL 03 | 56 | 4 | M | 8 | Nuclear |
| MIL 04 | 60 | 6 | M | - | Joint |
| MIL 05 | 52 | 5 | M | 5 | Joint |
| MIL 06 | 60 | 4 | M | 8 | Joint |
| LHS 01 | 42 | 3 | M | 12 | Nuclear |
| LHS 02 | 38 | 4 | M | 12 | Joint |
| LHS 03 | 47 | 3 | M | 10 | Nuclear |
| PCP 04 | 25 | - | M | 14 | Nuclear |
| PCP 05 | 26 | 1 | M | 14 | Joint |
| PCP 06 | 47 | 3 | M | 14 | Nuclear |
DM, depresses mother; RM, recovered mother; MIL, mother-in-law; LHS, lady health supervisor; PCP, primary care physician.
Figure 1Card to pictorial illustration matching activity.
Cause of maternal depression.
| 1. | Interpersonal Conflict | 1.1 Joint Family System | |
| 1.2 Unsupportive In-Laws | |||
| 1.3 Uncaring Husband | |||
| 2. | Overwhelmed with domestic responsibility | 2.1 Well Being of Children | |
| 2.2 Multiple Caregiver Demands | |||
| 2.3 Tend to Domestic Animals | |||
| 3. | Physical ailments | 3.1 Women Experiencing Ill Health | |
| 3.2 Ill Health of Family Members | |||
| 3.3 Ailment of Children | |||
| 4. | Poverty | 4.1 Unmet Financial Needs | |
| 4.3 Family Debt |
Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants in focus group discussions (n = 28).
| 20–29 | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| 30–39 | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| 40–49 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| Matric | 4 | 4 | 8 |
| FA | 6 | 3 | 9 |
| BA/MA | 5 | 5 | 11 |
| 1–5 Years | 13 | 13 | |
| 6–10 Years | 4 | 4 | |
| >10 Years | 11 | 11 | |
Analysis of card to pictorial matching (n = 28).
| 1. | Difficulty in Sleeping | 5 (83%) | 6 (75%) | 5 (71.4%) | 4 (57.1%) | 20 (71.4%) |
| 2. | Loss of Appetite | 4 (66%) | 7 (87%) | 4 (57.1%) | 5 (71.4%) | 21 (75%) |
| 3. | Reduced Concentration | 5 (83%) | 5 (62.5%) | 6 (85%) | 2 (28%) | 18 (64.2%) |
| 4. | Helplessness | 3 (50%) | 2 (25%) | 2 (28.4%) | 2 (28%) | 9 (32.1%) |
| 5. | Suicidal Ideation | 3 (50%) | 5 (62%) | 4 (57.1%) | 3 (50%) | 15 (53%) |
| 6. | Low Energy | 2 (17%) | 3 (37.5%) | 2 (28.4%) | 2 (28%) | 10 (32.1%) |
| 7 | Difficulty in Carrying Out Social Activity | 2 (17%) | 2 (28%) | 4 (57.1%) | 1 (33%) | 9 (32.1%) |
| 8. | Fatigue | 4 (66%) | 4 (50%) | 6 (85%) | 4 (57.1%) | 18 64.2%) |
| 9. | Agitation | 5 (83%) | 5 (62.5%) | 6 (85%) | 2 (28%) | 18 64.2%) |
Thematic analysis of focus group discussions (n = 4).
| Use of tool for detection | Early Detection | |
| Detection despite inability of disclosure | ||
| Early Referral | ||
| Use of the tool for understanding | Risk Factor for depression | |
| Outcomes of depression | ||
| Psychosocial Awareness in Mother | Better Counseling | |
| Better Care | ||
| As Visual Triggers | For Health Care workers |
Figure 2Community informant detection tool for maternal depression (CIDT-MD).