| Literature DB >> 33867537 |
Diana Augusto1, Cristiana Palmela Pereira2, Ana Rodrigues3, Roberto Cameriere4, Francisco Salvado5, Rui Santos6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Better understanding of dental age assessment may help in cases of age estimation in Forensic Clinics. The first aim was to provide essential information on method reliability for upcoming studies using dental age assessment by second molar index (I2M), and third molar index (I3M) for age estimation on legal ages of 12 - 14 years. The second aim was to document forensic method outcomes of the Demirjian method which has already been used in forensic clinic.Entities:
Keywords: 12 and 14- yearolds; Adolescent; Author keywords: Dental age assessment; Cameriere’s I 3M and I2M; Demirjian’s method; Forensic Dentistry; Legal age threshold; MeSH terms: Age Determination by Teeth; Molar; Portuguese penal code
Year: 2021 PMID: 33867537 PMCID: PMC8033628 DOI: 10.15644/asc55/1/6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Stomatol Croat ISSN: 0001-7019
Age distribution by sex
| Sample for I2M | Sample for I3M | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | Sex | Total | Sex | Total | ||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |||
| 7 | 38 | 25 | 63 | - | - | - |
| 8 | 48 | 36 | 84 | - | - | - |
| 9 | 60 | 41 | 101 | - | - | - |
| 10 | 54 | 39 | 93 | 26 | 35 | 61 |
| 11 | 45 | 29 | 74 | 23 | 37 | 60 |
| 12 | 35 | 38 | 73 | 22 | 30 | 52 |
| 13 | 28 | 22 | 50 | 27 | 19 | 46 |
| 14 | 23 | 17 | 40 | 23 | 24 | 47 |
| 15 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 16 | 13 | 29 |
| 16 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 13 | 13 | 26 |
| 17 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 8 | 22 | 30 |
| 18 | - | - | - | 10 | 9 | 19 |
| 19 | - | - | - | 15 | 13 | 28 |
| 20 | - | - | - | 11 | 5 | 16 |
| 21 | - | - | - | 10 | 10 | 20 |
| 22 | - | - | - | 8 | 13 | 21 |
| 23 | - | - | - | 6 | 10 | 16 |
| Total | 363 | 270 | 633 | 218 | 253 | 471 |
Figure 1Measurement of second molar index, according to the molar index proposed by Cameriere
Figure 2Measurement of the third molar index, according to de third molar index proposed by Cameriere
CCI values of intra-observer validation (I2M)
| A1 | 0.922 | |
| A2 | 0.918 | |
| L | 0.926 | |
| A | 0.810 | |
| L1 | 0.608 | |
| A1 | 0.927 | |
| A2 | 0.918 | |
| L | 0.943 | |
| A | 0.793 | |
| L1 | 0.653 |
Notes: A1, Width of the mesial open apex of the multiradicular tooth; A2, Width of the distal open apex of the multiradicular tooth; L, Maximum tooth length; A, Width of the open apex of the monoradicular tooth; L1, Maximum monoradicular tooth length
Weighted Cohen’s kappa coefficient values of intra and inter-observer validation (Demirjian)
| | | | |
|---|---|---|---|
| | Intra | 0.834 | 0.953 |
| Inter 1 | 0.834 | 0.953 | |
| Inter 2 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
CCI values of Intra-observer validation (I3M)
| A1 | 0.978 | 0.978 | 0.996 | |
| A2 | 0.985 | 0.966 | 0.996 | |
| L | 0.852 | 0.994 | 0.985 | |
| A | 0.991 | 0.996 | 0.998 | |
| L1 | 0.998 | 0.993 | 0.998 | |
| A1 | 0.991 | 0.992 | 0.964 | |
| A2 | 0.989 | 0.991 | 0.998 | |
| L | 0.985 | 0.994 | 0.997 | |
| A | 0.980 | 0.993 | 0.999 | |
| L1 | 0.981 | 0.988 | 0.993 | |
Notes: A1, Width of the mesial open apex of the multiradicular tooth; A2, Width of the distal open apex of the multiradicular tooth; L, Maximum tooth length; A, Width of the open apex of the monoradicular tooth; L1, Maximum monoradicular tooth length
Weighted Cohen’s kappa coefficient values of Intra and Inter-observer validation (Demirjian)
| | | | |
|---|---|---|---|
| | Intra | 0.969 | 0.990 |
| Inter 1 | 0.919 | 0.980 | |
| Inter 2 | 0.930 | 0.986 |
Reliability Measures for the cut-off points for the ages of 12 and 14 (I2M and Demirjian)
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | 81.19% | 88.53% |
| Specificity | 90.36% | 85.30% |
| Accuracy | 87.20% | 86.41% |
| PPV | 81.57% | 75.98% |
| NPV | 90.14% | 93.40% |
| LR+ | 8.42 | 6.02 |
| LR- | 0.21 | 0.13 |
| Bayes PTP | 91.57% | 88.60% |
| AUC | 0.93 | - |
| | | |
| Sensitivity | 90.53% | 90.53% |
| Specificity | 90.15% | 90.15% |
| Accuracy | 90.21% | 90.21% |
| PPV | 61.87% | 61.87% |
| NPV | 98.18% | 98.18% |
| LR+ | 9.19 | 9.19 |
| LR- | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Bayes PTP | 85.07% | 85.07% |
| AUC | 0.938 | - |
Reliability Measures for the cut-off points for the ages of 12 and 14 (I3M and Demirjian)
| Sensitivity | 93.98% | 94.56% |
| Specificity | 74.38% | 80.99% |
| Accuracy | 88.94% | 91.06% |
| PPV | 91.36% | 93.48% |
| NPV | 81.08% | 83.76% |
| LR+ | 3.67 | 4.97 |
| LR- | 0.08 | 0.07 |
| Bayes PTP | 96.00% | 97.02% |
| AUC | 0.959 | - |
| Sensitivity | 86.85% | 88.25% |
| Specificity | 88.13% | 92.69% |
| Accuracy | 87.45% | 89.96% |
| PPV | 89.34% | 95.06% |
| NPV | 85.40% | 83.20% |
| LR+ | 7.32 | 12.08 |
| LR- | 0.15 | 0.13 |
| Bayes PTP | 95.26% | 97.07% |
| AUC | 0.95 | - |
Figure 3ROC curves for I2M
Figure 4ROC curves for I3M