Literature DB >> 33867035

Biosensing strategies for the electrochemical detection of viruses and viral diseases - A review.

Laís Canniatti Brazaca1, Pãmyla Layene Dos Santos2, Paulo Roberto de Oliveira3, Diego Pessoa Rocha4, Jéssica Santos Stefano5, Cristiane Kalinke6, Rodrigo Alejandro Abarza Muñoz7, Juliano Alves Bonacin6, Bruno Campos Janegitz8, Emanuel Carrilho9.   

Abstract

Viruses are the causing agents for many relevant diseases, including influenza, Ebola, HIV/AIDS, and COVID-19. Its rapid replication and high transmissibility can lead to serious consequences not only to the individual but also to collective health, causing deep economic impacts. In this scenario, diagnosis tools are of significant importance, allowing the rapid, precise, and low-cost testing of a substantial number of individuals. Currently, PCR-based techniques are the gold standard for the diagnosis of viral diseases. Although these allow the diagnosis of different illnesses with high precision, they still present significant drawbacks. Their main disadvantages include long periods for obtaining results and the need for specialized professionals and equipment, requiring the tests to be performed in research centers. In this scenario, biosensors have been presented as promising alternatives for the rapid, precise, low-cost, and on-site diagnosis of viral diseases. This critical review article describes the advancements achieved in the last five years regarding electrochemical biosensors for the diagnosis of viral infections. First, genosensors and aptasensors for the detection of virus and the diagnosis of viral diseases are presented in detail regarding probe immobilization approaches, detection methods (label-free and sandwich), and amplification strategies. Following, immunosensors are highlighted, including many different construction strategies such as label-free, sandwich, competitive, and lateral-flow assays. Then, biosensors for the detection of viral-diseases-related biomarkers are presented and discussed, as well as point of care systems and their advantages when compared to traditional techniques. Last, the difficulties of commercializing electrochemical devices are critically discussed in conjunction with future trends such as lab-on-a-chip and flexible sensors.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Biosensors; Electrochemistry; Genosensor; Immunosensor; Viral diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33867035      PMCID: PMC9186435          DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chim Acta        ISSN: 0003-2670            Impact factor:   6.911


  212 in total

1.  Electrochemical magneto-actuated biosensor for CD4 count in AIDS diagnosis and monitoring.

Authors:  S Carinelli; C Xufré Ballesteros; M Martí; S Alegret; M I Pividori
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 10.618

2.  Genosensors for differential detection of Zika virus.

Authors:  Daniel Alzate; Sebastian Cajigas; Sara Robledo; Carlos Muskus; Jahir Orozco
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.057

3.  A sensitive label-free impedimetric DNA biosensor based on silsesquioxane-functionalized gold nanoparticles for Zika Virus detection.

Authors:  Marines Steinmetz; Dhésmon Lima; Adriano Gonçalves Viana; Sérgio Toshio Fujiwara; Christiana Andrade Pessôa; Rafael Mazer Etto; Karen Wohnrath
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 10.618

4.  Electrochemical paper-based peptide nucleic acid biosensor for detecting human papillomavirus.

Authors:  Prinjaporn Teengam; Weena Siangproh; Adisorn Tuantranont; Charles S Henry; Tirayut Vilaivan; Orawon Chailapakul
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 6.558

5.  The sweet detection of rolling circle amplification: Glucose-based electrochemical genosensor for the detection of viral nucleic acid.

Authors:  Sibel Ciftci; Rocío Cánovas; Felix Neumann; Thomas Paulraj; Mats Nilsson; Gaston A Crespo; Narayanan Madaboosi
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 10.618

6.  Eyeglasses-based tear biosensing system: Non-invasive detection of alcohol, vitamins and glucose.

Authors:  Juliane R Sempionatto; Laís Canniatti Brazaca; Laura García-Carmona; Gulcin Bolat; Alan S Campbell; Aida Martin; Guangda Tang; Rushabh Shah; Rupesh K Mishra; Jayoung Kim; Valtencir Zucolotto; Alberto Escarpa; Joseph Wang
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 10.618

7.  Facile synthesis of MoS2@Cu2O-Pt nanohybrid as enzyme-mimetic label for the detection of the Hepatitis B surface antigen.

Authors:  Faying Li; Yueyun Li; Jinhui Feng; Zengqiang Gao; Hui Lv; Xiang Ren; Qin Wei
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 8.  Biomarkers of severe dengue disease - a review.

Authors:  Daisy Vanitha John; Yee-Shin Lin; Guey Chuen Perng
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 8.410

Review 9.  Antibodies and antibody-derived analytical biosensors.

Authors:  Shikha Sharma; Hannah Byrne; Richard J O'Kennedy
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 8.000

10.  Genetic diversity and evolution of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Tung Phan
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.342

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Electrochemical Sensing Strategies for Food Allergen Detection.

Authors:  Antonella Curulli
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-09

Review 2.  Genosensors as an alternative diagnostic sensing approaches for specific detection of virus species: A review of common techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Abouzar Babaei; Amir Pouremamali; Nastaran Rafiee; Hessamaddin Sohrabi; Ahad Mokhtarzadeh; Miguel de la Guardia
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 14.908

3.  Electrochemical immunosensors using electrodeposited gold nanostructures for detecting the S proteins from SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Laís Canniatti Brazaca; Amanda Hikari Imamura; Nathalia Oezau Gomes; Mariana Bortholazzi Almeida; Desirée Tamara Scheidt; Paulo A Raymundo-Pereira; Osvaldo N Oliveira; Bruno Campos Janegitz; Sergio Antonio Spinola Machado; Emanuel Carrilho
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Electrochemical Detection of a Few Copies of Unamplified SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acids by a Self-Actuated Molecular System.

Authors:  Daizong Ji; Mingquan Guo; Yungen Wu; Wentao Liu; Shi Luo; Xuejun Wang; Hua Kang; Yiheng Chen; Changhao Dai; Derong Kong; Hongwenjie Ma; Yunqi Liu; Dacheng Wei
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 16.383

5.  New conductive filament ready-to-use for 3D-printing electrochemical (bio)sensors: Towards the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Jéssica Santos Stefano; Luiz Ricardo Guterres E Silva; Raquel Gomes Rocha; Laís Canniatti Brazaca; Eduardo Mathias Richter; Rodrigo Alejandro Abarza Muñoz; Bruno Campos Janegitz
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 6.911

Review 6.  Recent trends and advancements in electrochemiluminescence biosensors for human virus detection.

Authors:  Ebtesam Sobhanie; Foad Salehnia; Guobao Xu; Yalda Hamidipanah; Shayesteh Arshian; Ali Firoozbakhtian; Morteza Hosseini; Mohammad Reza Ganjali; Saima Hanif
Journal:  Trends Analyt Chem       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 14.908

7.  Electrochemical Biosensor for SARS-CoV-2 cDNA Detection Using AuPs-Modified 3D-Printed Graphene Electrodes.

Authors:  Luiz R G Silva; Jéssica S Stefano; Luiz O Orzari; Laís C Brazaca; Emanuel Carrilho; Luiz H Marcolino-Junior; Marcio F Bergamini; Rodrigo A A Munoz; Bruno C Janegitz
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.