Literature DB >> 33866489

Leveraging Motivational Interviewing to Coach Teachers in the Implementation of Preventive Evidence-Based Practices: A Sequential Analysis of the Motivational Interviewing Process.

Elise T Pas1, Lindsay Borden2, Keith Herman3, Catherine P Bradshaw4.   

Abstract

Though emerging research supports the effectiveness of school-based coaching models utilizing motivational interviewing (MI), an examination of the specific drivers behind these effects is notably lacking in the prevention field. This study leveraged sequential analysis to examine how teachers' verbalization of change talk (i.e., language in support of change) and sustain talk (i.e., language in support of maintaining the status quo) was influenced by coaches' use of MI-consistent (i.e., collaborative language supportive of change) and MI-inconsistent (e.g., confrontational, directive) language, respectively. We also examined whether teacher and coach factors were related to coach-teacher language dynamics. Data were collected from 87 teachers in 16 elementary and middle schools randomized in a trial to the Double Check preventive intervention (see Bradshaw et al., 2018). Audio-recorded coaching feedback sessions were coded using an adapted version of the Motivational Interviewing Sequential Code for Observing Process Exchanges (MI-SCOPE). Sequential analyses indicated that MI-consistent and change talk were significantly more likely than chance to occur consecutively. Teachers' sustain talk was also more likely to occur sequentially with coach use of MI-consistent language and teacher change talk; the latter suggests teacher ambivalence. Coaches rarely used MI-inconsistent language, and its occurrence was only associated with more MI-inconsistent language. Regression analyses indicated that teacher age, efficacy, burnout, classroom organization, and some design features (i.e., cohort, coach, coach-teacher racial match) were associated with different coach-teacher language dynamics. This novel school-based study illustrates how coaching MI evoked teacher change talk related to use of evidence-based programs.
© 2021. Society for Prevention Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33866489     DOI: 10.1007/s11121-021-01238-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Sci        ISSN: 1389-4986


  17 in total

1.  Client commitment language during motivational interviewing predicts drug use outcomes.

Authors:  Paul C Amrhein; William R Miller; Carolina E Yahne; Michael Palmer; Laura Fulcher
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2003-10

2.  Chasing change talk: the clinician's role in evoking client language about change.

Authors:  Lisa H Glynn; Theresa B Moyers
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2010-04-24

3.  Understanding and Measuring Coach-Teacher Alliance: A Glimpse Inside the 'Black Box'.

Authors:  Stacy R Johnson; Elise T Pas; Catherine P Bradshaw
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2016-05

4.  The Impact of Therapists' Responses to Resistance to Change: A Sequential Analysis of Therapist Client Interactions in Motivational Interviewing.

Authors:  L Drage; C Masterson; G Tober; T Farragher; B M Bewick
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.826

5.  A sequential analysis of motivational interviewing technical skills and client responses.

Authors:  M Barton Laws; Molly Magill; Nadine R Mastroleo; Kristi E Gamarel; Chanelle J Howe; Justin Walthers; Peter M Monti; Timothy Souza; Ira B Wilson; Gary S Rose; Christopher W Kahler
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2018-06-19

6.  Within-session communication patterns predict alcohol treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Jon M Houck; Theresa B Moyers
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Importance and feasibility of an adapted set of implementation strategies in schools.

Authors:  Aaron R Lyon; Clayton R Cook; Jill Locke; Chayna Davis; Byron J Powell; Thomas J Waltz
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2019-08-06

8.  "Old dogs" and new skills: how clinician characteristics relate to motivational interviewing skills before, during, and after training.

Authors:  Kenneth M Carpenter; Wendy Y Cheng; Jennifer L Smith; Adam C Brooks; Paul C Amrhein; R Morgan Wain; Edward V Nunes
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-05-07

9.  Which Individual Therapist Behaviors Elicit Client Change Talk and Sustain Talk in Motivational Interviewing?

Authors:  Timothy R Apodaca; Kristina M Jackson; Brian Borsari; Molly Magill; Richard Longabaugh; Nadine R Mastroleo; Nancy P Barnett
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2015-09-21

Review 10.  Mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing: a review and preliminary evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Timothy R Apodaca; Richard Longabaugh
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  1 in total

1.  Taking a Motivational Interviewing Approach to Prevention Science: Progress and Extensions.

Authors:  Daniel S Shaw; Melvin N Wilson
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2021-06-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.