Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek1, Fatma Mohamed Sherif2. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt. Electronic address: arazek@mans.edu.eg. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.
Abstract
PURPOSE: to assess diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); an emerging technique for differentiation between pyogenic and tuberculous spondylitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was carried out on 33 patients with infective spondylitis performing conventional MRI and DTI. The mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) of the affected vertebral body were calculated by two readers. RESULTS: The MD of pyogenic spondylitis of both readers (1.48 ± 0.09 and 1.47 ± 0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s) were significantly higher values (P = 0.001) than tuberculous spondylitis (1.11 ± 0.15 and 1.18 ± 0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s). The FA of pyogenic spondylitis of both readers (0.18 ± 0.09 and 0.20 ± 0.08) were significantly lower values (P = 0.001) than tuberculous spondylitis (0.30 ± 0.05 and 0.32 ± 0.03). There was a strong inter-reader agreement between both readers using MD (K = 0.963) and FA (K = 0.858). The thresholds MD and FA used for differentiating pyogenic and tuberculous spondylitis of both readers were 1.37 and 1.33 × 10-3 mm2/s and 0.21 and 0.25 with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.927 and 0.831 respectively. Combined MD and FA revealed increased AUC to 0.97 and 0.98 of both readers respectively. CONCLUSION: DTI with its parameters can be considered a noninvasive beneficial quantitative method that can help in differentiation between pyogenic and tuberculous spondylitis.
PURPOSE: to assess diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); an emerging technique for differentiation between pyogenic and tuberculous spondylitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was carried out on 33 patients with infective spondylitis performing conventional MRI and DTI. The mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) of the affected vertebral body were calculated by two readers. RESULTS: The MD of pyogenic spondylitis of both readers (1.48 ± 0.09 and 1.47 ± 0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s) were significantly higher values (P = 0.001) than tuberculous spondylitis (1.11 ± 0.15 and 1.18 ± 0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s). The FA of pyogenic spondylitis of both readers (0.18 ± 0.09 and 0.20 ± 0.08) were significantly lower values (P = 0.001) than tuberculous spondylitis (0.30 ± 0.05 and 0.32 ± 0.03). There was a strong inter-reader agreement between both readers using MD (K = 0.963) and FA (K = 0.858). The thresholds MD and FA used for differentiating pyogenic and tuberculous spondylitis of both readers were 1.37 and 1.33 × 10-3 mm2/s and 0.21 and 0.25 with the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.927 and 0.831 respectively. Combined MD and FA revealed increased AUC to 0.97 and 0.98 of both readers respectively. CONCLUSION: DTI with its parameters can be considered a noninvasive beneficial quantitative method that can help in differentiation between pyogenic and tuberculous spondylitis.