Laurel P Gibson1, Charleen J Gust2, Jarrod M Ellingson3, Sophie L YorkWilliams2, Cristina Sempio4, Jost Klawitter5, Angela D Bryan6, Kent E Hutchison6, L Cinnamon Bidwell6. 1. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO, 80309-0345, USA. Electronic address: laurel.gibson@colorado.edu. 2. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO, 80309-0345, USA. 3. Division of Substance Dependence, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E. 17th Place, Mail Stop F570, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12705 East Montview Blvd, Suite 200, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. 5. Division of Substance Dependence, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E. 17th Place, Mail Stop F570, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12705 East Montview Blvd, Suite 200, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. 6. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO, 80309-0345, USA; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, 344 UCB, Boulder, CO, 80309-0344, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An innovative naturalistic at-home administration procedure was used to investigate sex differences in subjective drug effects and verbal memory errors after ad libitum use of high potency state legal market Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrate. METHODS: Regular concentrate users were randomly assigned to ad libitum administration of one of two cannabis concentrate products (70 % or 90 % THC) that they purchased from a dispensary. 65 participants (N = 34 men, N = 31 women) were assessed in a mobile pharmacology lab before, immediately after, and 1 -h after ad libitum concentrate use. Plasma cannabinoids (THC, 11-OH-THC, CBD), subjective drug effects, and verbal memory errors were assessed at all three time points. RESULTS: Although men and women exhibited similar plasma 11-OH-THC levels across time (p = .10), sex differences were found in plasma THC and CBD after legal market concentrate use, with men displaying significantly higher levels of plasma THC and CBD immediately after cannabis concentrate use (plasma THC [ng/mL]: Mmen = 489.88, Mwomen = 135.08, p < .001; plasma CBD [ng/mL]: Mmen = 1.14, Mwomen = 0.53, p = .04). Despite this, sex differences in subjective effects and verbal memory errors did not emerge, although women reported a steeper decrease in drug liking after use (p = .04). CONCLUSION: These data provide the first look at sex differences after acute naturalistic cannabis concentrate use, and suggest much higher THC exposure in men versus women, but similar acute drug and impairment effects across the sexes. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms (e.g. tolerance, cannabinoid metabolism, smoking topography) behind these findings.
BACKGROUND: An innovative naturalistic at-home administration procedure was used to investigate sex differences in subjective drug effects and verbal memory errors after ad libitum use of high potency state legal market Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrate. METHODS: Regular concentrate users were randomly assigned to ad libitum administration of one of two cannabis concentrate products (70 % or 90 % THC) that they purchased from a dispensary. 65 participants (N = 34 men, N = 31 women) were assessed in a mobile pharmacology lab before, immediately after, and 1 -h after ad libitum concentrate use. Plasma cannabinoids (THC, 11-OH-THC, CBD), subjective drug effects, and verbal memory errors were assessed at all three time points. RESULTS: Although men and women exhibited similar plasma 11-OH-THC levels across time (p = .10), sex differences were found in plasma THC and CBD after legal market concentrate use, with men displaying significantly higher levels of plasma THC and CBD immediately after cannabis concentrate use (plasma THC [ng/mL]: Mmen = 489.88, Mwomen = 135.08, p < .001; plasma CBD [ng/mL]: Mmen = 1.14, Mwomen = 0.53, p = .04). Despite this, sex differences in subjective effects and verbal memory errors did not emerge, although women reported a steeper decrease in drug liking after use (p = .04). CONCLUSION: These data provide the first look at sex differences after acute naturalistic cannabis concentrate use, and suggest much higher THC exposure in men versus women, but similar acute drug and impairment effects across the sexes. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms (e.g. tolerance, cannabinoid metabolism, smoking topography) behind these findings.
Authors: Tory R Spindle; Edward J Cone; Nicolas J Schlienz; John M Mitchell; George E Bigelow; Ronald Flegel; Eugene Hayes; Ryan Vandrey Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Thomas Nadulski; Frank Sporkert; Martin Schnelle; Andreas M Stadelmann; Patrik Roser; Tom Schefter; Fritz Pragst Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Laurel P Gibson; Hollis C Karoly; Jarrod M Ellingson; Jost Klawitter; Cristina Sempio; Julia E Squeri; Angela D Bryan; L Cinnamon Bidwell; Kent E Hutchison Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 4.093
Authors: Thomas R Arkell; Richard C Kevin; Frederick Vinckenbosch; Nicholas Lintzeris; Eef Theunissen; Johannes G Ramaekers; Iain S McGregor Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 4.093