Aaron M Tryhus1, Phillip M Epperly1, April T Davenport1, Lindsey K Galbo1, Paul W Czoty2. 1. Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States. 2. Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, United States. Electronic address: pczoty@wakehealth.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although most individuals with cocaine use disorder also abuse alcohol, little is known about the behavioral and pharmacological mechanisms that promote co-abuse. For example, it is unclear whether prior experience with alcohol renders individuals more sensitive to cocaine when it is subsequently experienced. METHODS: This study examined the effects of chronic ethanol consumption on subsequent cocaine reinforcement in rhesus monkeys. Six monkeys consumed 2.0 g/kg ethanol in a binge-drinking paradigm and 6 monkeys drank a non-alcoholic solution 5 days per week. After 9 months, each monkey's sensitivity to acquiring cocaine self-administration was determined. Monkeys performed an operant response resulting in food pellet delivery under a fixed-ratio 30 schedule of reinforcement. Saline, then ascending doses of cocaine, were substituted for food pellets until a cocaine dose was reached at which the number of cocaine injections delivered differed significantly from saline injections delivered. Following acquisition, a complete cocaine dose-effect curve was generated to determine whether ethanol consumption altered the reinforcing potency of cocaine determined by calculating the ED50 of the ascending limb of each subject's curve. RESULTS: Although individual variability was observed, the cocaine dose which initially served as a reinforcer did not differ between ethanol-drinking and control groups and, within the ethanol-drinking group, was not related to the amount of ethanol consumed. Moreover, the reinforcing potency of cocaine did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Taken together, the data suggest that a history of binge-like alcohol consumption does not affect sensitivity to cocaine when it is subsequently first experienced.
BACKGROUND: Although most individuals with cocaine use disorder also abuse alcohol, little is known about the behavioral and pharmacological mechanisms that promote co-abuse. For example, it is unclear whether prior experience with alcohol renders individuals more sensitive to cocaine when it is subsequently experienced. METHODS: This study examined the effects of chronic ethanol consumption on subsequent cocaine reinforcement in rhesus monkeys. Six monkeys consumed 2.0 g/kg ethanol in a binge-drinking paradigm and 6 monkeys drank a non-alcoholic solution 5 days per week. After 9 months, each monkey's sensitivity to acquiring cocaine self-administration was determined. Monkeys performed an operant response resulting in food pellet delivery under a fixed-ratio 30 schedule of reinforcement. Saline, then ascending doses of cocaine, were substituted for food pellets until a cocaine dose was reached at which the number of cocaine injections delivered differed significantly from saline injections delivered. Following acquisition, a complete cocaine dose-effect curve was generated to determine whether ethanol consumption altered the reinforcing potency of cocaine determined by calculating the ED50 of the ascending limb of each subject's curve. RESULTS: Although individual variability was observed, the cocaine dose which initially served as a reinforcer did not differ between ethanol-drinking and control groups and, within the ethanol-drinking group, was not related to the amount of ethanol consumed. Moreover, the reinforcing potency of cocaine did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Taken together, the data suggest that a history of binge-like alcohol consumption does not affect sensitivity to cocaine when it is subsequently first experienced.
Authors: Felicity M Say; Aaron M Tryhus; Phillip M Epperly; Susan H Nader; Kiran K Solingapuram Sai; Brianna E George; Haley A Kirse; Paul W Czoty Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 4.093