Minako Azuma1, Yoshihito Kadota2, Misayo Matsuyama3, Hiroshi Moritake3, Toshinori Hirai4. 1. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan. minako_azuma@med.miyazaki-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan. 4. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the usefulness of fat-suppressed three-dimensional T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (FS 3D T1W-VISTA) imaging for the evaluation of the ectopic posterior pituitary gland (EPPG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 9 patients with EPPG due to causes other than tumor. All underwent sagittal two-dimensional (2D) T1W-, FS 3D T1W-VISTA- (VISTA), and 3D T2W-driven equilibrium radiofrequency reset pulse (DRIVE) imaging. Two radiologists independently reviewed the 2D T1W- and VISTA images for their image quality and for visualization of the EPPG and of pituitary stalk transection. DRIVE findings were used as the reference standard for pituitary stalk transection. Interobserver and intermodality agreements were evaluated with the kappa (κ) coefficient. The mean grade assigned to the 2D T1W- and the VISTA imaging technique for visualization of the EPPG was assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement for visualization of the EPPG on 2D T1W- and VISTA images was excellent (κ = 0.82 and κ = 1.00, respectively). The mean grade for EPPG visualization was significantly higher for VISTA- than 2D T1W images (p = 0.0039). CONCLUSION: FS 3D T1W-VISTA imaging is useful for the evaluation of EPPG. Conventional MRI yields insufficient information for the evaluation of the ectopic posterior pituitary gland (EPPG). The visualization of the EPPG was significantly higher for fat-suppressed three-dimensional T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (FS 3D T1W-VISTA) than 2D T1W images. FS 3D T1W-VISTA imaging is useful for the evaluation of the EPPG.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the usefulness of fat-suppressed three-dimensional T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (FS 3D T1W-VISTA) imaging for the evaluation of the ectopic posterior pituitary gland (EPPG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 9 patients with EPPG due to causes other than tumor. All underwent sagittal two-dimensional (2D) T1W-, FS 3D T1W-VISTA- (VISTA), and 3D T2W-driven equilibrium radiofrequency reset pulse (DRIVE) imaging. Two radiologists independently reviewed the 2D T1W- and VISTA images for their image quality and for visualization of the EPPG and of pituitary stalk transection. DRIVE findings were used as the reference standard for pituitary stalk transection. Interobserver and intermodality agreements were evaluated with the kappa (κ) coefficient. The mean grade assigned to the 2D T1W- and the VISTA imaging technique for visualization of the EPPG was assessed by the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement for visualization of the EPPG on 2D T1W- and VISTA images was excellent (κ = 0.82 and κ = 1.00, respectively). The mean grade for EPPG visualization was significantly higher for VISTA- than 2D T1W images (p = 0.0039). CONCLUSION: FS 3D T1W-VISTA imaging is useful for the evaluation of EPPG. Conventional MRI yields insufficient information for the evaluation of the ectopic posterior pituitary gland (EPPG). The visualization of the EPPG was significantly higher for fat-suppressed three-dimensional T1-weighted volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (FS 3D T1W-VISTA) than 2D T1W images. FS 3D T1W-VISTA imaging is useful for the evaluation of the EPPG.
Authors: L P Mark; V M Haughton; L E Hendrix; D L Daniels; A L Williams; L F Czervionke; R J Asleson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1991 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: P D Molyneux; N Tubridy; G J Parker; G J Barker; D G MacManus; P S Tofts; I F Moseley; D H Miller Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 3.825