Literature DB >> 33861551

Association of Sedation, Coma, and In-Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019-Related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Karuna Wongtangman1, Peter Santer, Luca J Wachtendorf, Omid Azimaraghi, Elias Baedorf Kassis, Bijan Teja, Kadhiresan R Murugappan, Shahla Siddiqui, Matthias Eikermann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, sedatives and opioids are commonly administered which may lead to increased vulnerability to neurologic dysfunction. We tested the hypothesis that patients with coronavirus disease 2019-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome are at higher risk of in-hospital mortality due to prolonged coma compared with other patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome matched for disease severity.
DESIGN: Propensity-matched cohort study.
SETTING: Seven ICUs in an academic hospital network, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA). PATIENTS: All mechanically ventilated coronavirus disease 2019 patients between March and May 2020 were identified and matched with patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome of other etiology.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using clinical data obtained from a hospital registry, we matched 114 coronavirus disease 2019 patients to 228 noncoronavirus disease 2019-related acute respiratory distress syndrome patients based on baseline disease severity. Coma was identified using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale less than or equal to -3. Multivariable logistic regression and mediation analyses were used to assess the percentage of comatose days, sedative medications used, and the association between coronavirus disease 2019 and in-hospital mortality. In-hospital mortality (48.3% vs 31.6%, adjusted odds ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.34-3.44; p = 0.002), the percentage of comatose days (66.0% ± 31.3% vs 36.0% ± 36.9%, adjusted difference, 29.35; 95% CI, 21.45-37.24; p < 0.001), and the hypnotic agent dose (51.3% vs 17.1% of maximum hypnotic agent dose given in the cohort; p < 0.001) were higher among patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Brain imaging did not show a higher frequency of structural brain lesions in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (6.1% vs 7.0%; p = 0.76). Hypnotic agent dose was associated with coma (adjusted coefficient, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.78; p < 0.001) and mediated (p = 0.001) coma. Coma was associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 5.84; 95% CI, 3.58-9.58; p < 0.001) and mediated 59% of in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with matched patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome of other etiology, patients with coronavirus disease 2019 received higher doses of hypnotics, which was associated with prolonged coma and higher mortality.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33861551     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  14 in total

Review 1.  Early spontaneous breathing for acute respiratory distress syndrome in individuals with COVID-19.

Authors:  Friedrich Hohmann; Lisa Wedekind; Felicitas Grundeis; Steffen Dickel; Johannes Frank; Martin Golinski; Mirko Griesel; Clemens Grimm; Cindy Herchenhahn; Andre Kramer; Maria-Inti Metzendorf; Onnen Moerer; Nancy Olbrich; Volker Thieme; Astrid Vieler; Falk Fichtner; Jacob Burns; Sven Laudi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-06-29

Review 2.  Monitoring of sedation in mechanically ventilated patients using remote technology.

Authors:  Dusan Hanidziar; Michael Brandon Westover
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Electroencephalogram-Based Evaluation of Impaired Sedation in Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19 ARDS.

Authors:  Armin Niklas Flinspach; Sebastian Zinn; Kai Zacharowski; Ümniye Balaban; Eva Herrmann; Elisabeth Hannah Adam
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Sedation Practices in the PICU: An Unexpected Casualty of COVID-19.

Authors:  Katherine Pumphrey; Alisha Bouzaher; Barbara-Jo Achuff; Chani Traube
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 5.  COVID-19 Critical Illness: A Data-Driven Review.

Authors:  Jennifer C Ginestra; Oscar J L Mitchell; George L Anesi; Jason D Christie
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 16.048

6.  Reasons for the Overuse of Sedatives and Deep Sedation for Mechanically Ventilated Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients.

Authors:  Zhongxiang Xiao; Leping Zhao
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 9.296

7.  The authors reply.

Authors:  Karuna Wongtangman; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 9.296

8.  Associated Factors of High Sedative Requirements within Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19 ARDS.

Authors:  Armin N Flinspach; Hendrik Booke; Kai Zacharowski; Ümniye Balaban; Eva Herrmann; Elisabeth H Adam
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  A Dual-Center Cohort Study on The Association Between Early Deep Sedation and Clinical Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: the COVID-SED Study.

Authors:  Robert J Stephens; Erin M Evans; Michael J Pajor; Ryan D Pappal; Haley M Egan; Max Wei; Hunter Hayes; Jason A Morris; Nicholas Becker; Brian W Roberts; Marin H Kollef; Nicholas M Mohr; Brian M Fuller
Journal:  Res Sq       Date:  2022-03-01

10.  Early Clinical and Electrophysiological Brain Dysfunction Is Associated With ICU Outcomes in COVID-19 Critically Ill Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Prospective Bicentric Observational Study.

Authors:  Sarah Benghanem; Alain Cariou; Jean-Luc Diehl; Angela Marchi; Julien Charpentier; Jean-Loup Augy; Caroline Hauw-Berlemont; Martine Gavaret; Frédéric Pène; Jean-Paul Mira; Tarek Sharshar; Bertrand Hermann
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 9.296

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.