Lars G Hvid1, Dylan L Harwood2, Simon F Eskildsen3, Ulrik Dalgas2. 1. Exercise Biology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. lhvid@ph.au.dk. 2. Exercise Biology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 3. Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the intriguing potential of physical exercise being able to preserve or even restore brain volume (grey matter volume in particular)-a tissue essential for both cognitive and physical function-no reviews have so far synthesized the existing knowledge from randomized controlled trials investigating exercise-induced changes of the brain's grey matter volume in populations at risk of neurodegeneration. Our objective was to critically review the existing evidence regarding this topic. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases primo April 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of aerobic training, resistance training or concurrent training on brain grey volume changes (by MRI) in adult clinical or healthy elderly populations. RESULTS: A total of 20 articles (from 19 RCTs) evaluating 3-12 months of aerobic, resistance, or concurrent training were identified and included, involving a total of 1662 participants (populations: healthy older adults, older adults with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease, adults with schizophrenia or multiple sclerosis or major depression). While few studies indicated a positive effect-although modest-of physical exercise on certain regions of brain grey matter volume, the majority of study findings were neutral (i.e., no effects/small effect sizes) and quite divergent across populations. Meta-analyses showed that different exercise modalities failed to elicit any substantial effects on whole brain grey volume and hippocampus volume, although with rather large confidence interval width (i.e., variability). CONCLUSION: Altogether, the current evidence on the effects of physical exercise on whole/regional grey matter brain volume appear sparse and inconclusive, and does not support that physical exercise is as potent as previously proposed when it comes to affecting brain grey matter volume.
BACKGROUND: Despite the intriguing potential of physical exercise being able to preserve or even restore brain volume (grey matter volume in particular)-a tissue essential for both cognitive and physical function-no reviews have so far synthesized the existing knowledge from randomized controlled trials investigating exercise-induced changes of the brain's grey matter volume in populations at risk of neurodegeneration. Our objective was to critically review the existing evidence regarding this topic. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases primo April 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of aerobic training, resistance training or concurrent training on brain grey volume changes (by MRI) in adult clinical or healthy elderly populations. RESULTS: A total of 20 articles (from 19 RCTs) evaluating 3-12 months of aerobic, resistance, or concurrent training were identified and included, involving a total of 1662 participants (populations: healthy older adults, older adults with mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease, adults with schizophrenia or multiple sclerosis or major depression). While few studies indicated a positive effect-although modest-of physical exercise on certain regions of brain grey matter volume, the majority of study findings were neutral (i.e., no effects/small effect sizes) and quite divergent across populations. Meta-analyses showed that different exercise modalities failed to elicit any substantial effects on whole brain grey volume and hippocampus volume, although with rather large confidence interval width (i.e., variability). CONCLUSION: Altogether, the current evidence on the effects of physical exercise on whole/regional grey matter brain volume appear sparse and inconclusive, and does not support that physical exercise is as potent as previously proposed when it comes to affecting brain grey matter volume.
Authors: C R Jack; R C Petersen; Y Xu; P C O'Brien; G E Smith; R J Ivnik; B F Boeve; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-08-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Neeltje E M van Haren; Hugo G Schnack; Wiepke Cahn; Martijn P van den Heuvel; Claude Lepage; Louis Collins; Alan C Evans; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; René S Kahn Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-09
Authors: L J Seidman; D Yurgelun-Todd; W S Kremen; B T Woods; J M Goldstein; S V Faraone; M T Tsuang Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 1994-02-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Lorenzo Pini; Michela Pievani; Martina Bocchetta; Daniele Altomare; Paolo Bosco; Enrica Cavedo; Samantha Galluzzi; Moira Marizzoni; Giovanni B Frisoni Journal: Ageing Res Rev Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 10.895
Authors: Arman Eshaghi; Ferran Prados; Wallace J Brownlee; Daniel R Altmann; Carmen Tur; M Jorge Cardoso; Floriana De Angelis; Steven H van de Pavert; Niamh Cawley; Nicola De Stefano; M Laura Stromillo; Marco Battaglini; Serena Ruggieri; Claudio Gasperini; Massimo Filippi; Maria A Rocca; Alex Rovira; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Hugo Vrenken; Cyra E Leurs; Joep Killestein; Lukas Pirpamer; Christian Enzinger; Sebastien Ourselin; Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott; Declan Chard; Alan J Thompson; Daniel C Alexander; Frederik Barkhof; Olga Ciccarelli Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Fabienne A U Fox; Kersten Diers; Hweeling Lee; Andreas Mayr; Martin Reuter; Monique M B Breteler; N Ahmad Aziz Journal: Neurology Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 11.800