Literature DB >> 33860407

Machine learning applied to a Cardiac Surgery Recovery Unit and to a Coronary Care Unit for mortality prediction.

Beatriz Nistal-Nuño1.   

Abstract

Most established severity-of-illness systems used for prediction of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality were developed targeted at the general ICU population, based on logistic regression (LR). To date, no dynamic predictive tool for ICU mortality has been developed targeted at the Cardiac Surgery Recovery Unit (CSRU) and Coronary Care Unit (CCU) using machine learning (ML). CSRU and CCU adult patients from the MIMIC-III critical care database were studied. The ML methods developed extract ICU data during a 5-h window and demographic features to produce mortality predictions and were compared to six established severity-of-illness systems and LR. In a secondary experiment, additional procedure/surgery and ICU features were added to the models. The ML models developed were the Tree Ensemble (TE), Random Forest, XGBoost Tree Ensemble (XGB), Naive Bayes (NB), and Bayesian network. The discrimination, calibration and accuracy statistics were assessed. The AUROC values were superior for the ML models reaching 0.926 and 0.924 for the XGB, and 0.904 and 0.908 for the TE for ICU mortality prediction in the primary and secondary experiments respectively. Among the conventional systems, the serial SOFA obtained the highest AUROC (0.8405). The Brier score was better for the ML models except the NB over the conventional systems. The accuracy statistics less sensitive to unbalanced cohorts were higher for all the ML models. In conclusion, the predictive power of XGB was excellent, substantially outperforming the conventional systems and LR. The ML models developed in this work offer promising results that could benefit CSRU and CCU.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac Surgery Recovery Unit; Coronary Care Unit; Decision-support systems; Machine learning; Mortality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33860407     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00703-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   1.977


  23 in total

1.  The CAHP (Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis) score: a tool for risk stratification after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Carole Maupain; Wulfran Bougouin; Lionel Lamhaut; Nicolas Deye; Jean-Luc Diehl; Guillaume Geri; Marie-Cécile Perier; Frankie Beganton; Eloi Marijon; Xavier Jouven; Alain Cariou; Florence Dumas
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Predicting survival with good neurological recovery at hospital admission after successful resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the OHCA score.

Authors:  Christophe Adrie; Alain Cariou; Bruno Mourvillier; Ivan Laurent; Hala Dabbane; Fatima Hantala; Abdel Rhaoui; Marie Thuong; Mehran Monchi
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Performance of clinical risk scores to predict mortality and neurological outcome in cardiac arrest patients.

Authors:  Cyril Isenschmid; Tanja Luescher; Roshaani Rasiah; Jeanice Kalt; Theresa Tondorf; Martina Gamp; Christoph Becker; Kai Tisljar; Raoul Sutter; Philipp Schuetz; Seraina Hochstrasser; Kerstin Metzger; Stephan Marsch; Sabina Hunziker
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  A new severity of illness scale using a subset of Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation data elements shows comparable predictive accuracy.

Authors:  Alistair E W Johnson; Andrew A Kramer; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Effectiveness of SAPS III to predict hospital mortality for post-cardiac arrest patients.

Authors:  Magali Bisbal; Elisabeth Jouve; Laurent Papazian; Sophie de Bourmont; Gilles Perrin; Beatrice Eon; Marc Gainnier
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients.

Authors:  F L Ferreira; D P Bota; A Bross; C Mélot; J L Vincent
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients.

Authors:  J R Le Gall; P Loirat; A Alperovitch; P Glaser; C Granthil; D Mathieu; P Mercier; R Thomas; D Villers
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Determinants of the calibration of SAPS II and SAPS 3 mortality scores in intensive care: a European multicenter study.

Authors:  Antoine Poncet; Thomas V Perneger; Paolo Merlani; Maurizia Capuzzo; Christophe Combescure
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Additive Effect on Survival of Anaesthetic Cardiac Protection and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Cardiac Surgery: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Alberto Zangrillo; Mario Musu; Teresa Greco; Ambra Licia Di Prima; Andrea Matteazzi; Valentina Testa; Pasquale Nardelli; Daniela Febres; Fabrizio Monaco; Maria Grazia Calabrò; Jun Ma; Gabriele Finco; Giovanni Landoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Simplified Acute Physiology Score III Is Superior to the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II in Predicting Surgical and ICU Mortality in the "Oldest Old".

Authors:  Aftab Haq; Sachin Patil; Alexis Lanteri Parcells; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res       Date:  2014-02-17
View more
  2 in total

1.  Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Long-Term Mortality in Patients After Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Chi Peng; Zhiyuan Zhang; Kejia Shen; Yufeng Zhang; Jian Xiao; Wang Xi; Pei Wang; Jin Rao; Zhichao Jin; Zhinong Wang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-03

2.  Hypotension Prediction Index with non-invasive continuous arterial pressure waveforms (ClearSight): clinical performance in Gynaecologic Oncologic Surgery.

Authors:  Luciano Frassanito; Pietro Paolo Giuri; Francesco Vassalli; Alessandra Piersanti; Alessia Longo; Bruno Antonio Zanfini; Stefano Catarci; Anna Fagotti; Giovanni Scambia; Gaetano Draisci
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 1.977

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.