Literature DB >> 33860379

Mapping PedsQL™ Generic Core Scales to EQ-5D-3L utility scores in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients.

Asrul Akmal Shafie1,2, Irwinder Kaur Chhabra3,4, Jacqueline Hui Yi Wong3,5, Noor Syahireen Mohammed3,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a mapping algorithm for generating EQ-5D-3L utility scores from the PedsQL Generic Core Scales (PedsQL GCS) in patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT).
METHODS: The algorithm was developed using data from 345 TDT patients. Spearman's rank correlation was used to evaluate the conceptual overlap between the instruments. Model specifications were chosen using a stepwise regression. Both direct and response mapping methods were attempted. Six mapping estimation methods ordinary least squares (OLS), a log-transformed response using OLS, generalized linear model (GLM), two-part model (TPM), Tobit and multinomial logistic regression (MLOGIT) were tested to determine the root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Other criterion used were accuracy of the predicted utility score, proportions of absolute differences that was less than 0.03 and intraclass correlation coefficient. An in-sample, leave-one-out cross validation was conducted to test the generalizability of each model.
RESULTS: The best performing model was specified with three out of the four PedsQL GCS scales-the physical, emotional and social functioning score. The best performing estimation method for direct mapping was a GLM with a RMSE of 0.1273 and MAE of 0.1016, while the best estimation method for response mapping was the MLOGIT with a RMSE of 0.1597 and MAE of 0.0826.
CONCLUSION: The mapping algorithm developed using the GLM would facilitate the calculation of utility scores to inform economic evaluations for TDT patients when EQ-5D data is not available. However, caution should be exercised when using this algorithm in patients who have poor quality of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EQ-5D-3L; Mapping algorithm; PedsQL; Quality of life; Thalassemia; Utility scores

Year:  2021        PMID: 33860379     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01287-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  9 in total

Review 1.  A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures.

Authors:  John E Brazier; Yaling Yang; Aki Tsuchiya; Donna Louise Rowen
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2009-07-08

2.  Probabilistic mapping of descriptive health status responses onto health state utilities using Bayesian networks: an empirical analysis converting SF-12 into EQ-5D utility index in a national US sample.

Authors:  Quang A Le; Jason N Doctor
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.

Authors:  Terry K Koo; Mae Y Li
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-03-31

Review 4.  Changing patterns of thalassemia worldwide.

Authors:  Elliott P Vichinsky
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  The PedsQL: measurement model for the pediatric quality of life inventory.

Authors:  J W Varni; M Seid; C A Rode
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Addressing ceiling effects in health status measures: a comparison of techniques applied to measures for people with HIV disease.

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Constantine Frangakis; Mark J Atkinson; Richard J Willke; Walter L Leite; W Bruce Vogel; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  A paradigm shift on beta-thalassaemia treatment: How will we manage this old disease with new therapies?

Authors:  Maria Domenica Cappellini; John B Porter; Vip Viprakasit; Ali T Taher
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 8.250

8.  Intraclass correlation - A discussion and demonstration of basic features.

Authors:  David Liljequist; Britt Elfving; Kirsti Skavberg Roaldsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.