Literature DB >> 33860363

Management of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano among gastrointestinal surgeons in the Netherlands.

L Dekker1,2, D D E Zimmerman3, R M Smeenk4, R Schouten5, I J M Han-Geurts6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano (FIA) can be challenging. Despite Dutch and international guidelines determining optimal therapy is still quite difficult. The aim of this study was to report current practices in the management of cryptoglandular FIA among gastrointestinal surgeons in the Netherlands.
METHODS: Dutch surgeons and residents who are treating FIA regularly were sent a survey invitation by email. The survey was available online from September 19 to December 1 2019. The questionnaire consisted of 28 questions concerning diagnostic and surgical techniques in the treatment of intersphincteric and transsphincteric FIA.
RESULTS: In total, 147 (43%) surgeons responded and completed the survey. Magnetic resonance imaging was the preferred diagnostic imaging modality (97%) followed by the endo-anal ultrasound (12%). In case of a high FIA, 86% used a non-cutting seton. Most respondents removed a seton between 6 weeks and 3 months (n = 84, 58%). Fistulotomy was the procedure of preference in low transsphincteric (86%) and low intersphincteric FIA (92%). Mucosal advancement flap (MAF) and ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), with 78% and 46%, respectively, were the procedures that were applied most often in high transsphincteric FIA. In high intersphincteric FIA 67% performed a MAF and 33% a fistulotomy. Thirty-three percent of all respondents stated that they habitually closed the internal fistula opening, half of them used a Z-plasty. For debridement of the fistula tract the preferred method was curettage (78%).
CONCLUSIONS: Dutch gastrointestinal surgeons use various techniques in the management of FIA. Novel promising techniques should be investigated adequately in sufficient large trials to increase consensus. A core outcome measurement and a prospective international database would help in comparing results. Until then, treatment should be adjusted to the individual patient, governed by fistula characteristics and patient choice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal fistula; Diagnostic; Fistula in ano; Perianal fistula; Surgical; Survey; Therapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33860363     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-021-02446-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  37 in total

1.  Anal fistula plug vs rectal advancement flap for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  H Lin; Z Jin; Y Zhu; M Diao; W Hu
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 2.  Rectal advancement flap for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular anal fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zutoia Balciscueta; Natalia Uribe; Izaskun Balciscueta; Juan Carlos Andreu-Ballester; Eduardo García-Granero
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Anorectal Abscess, Fistula-in-Ano, and Rectovaginal Fistula.

Authors:  Jon D Vogel; Eric K Johnson; Arden M Morris; Ian M Paquette; Theodore J Saclarides; Daniel L Feingold; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Classic articles in colon and rectal surgery. Hippocrates: on fistulae.

Authors:  M L Corman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1980 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Long-term outcome of low perianal fistulas treated by fistulotomy: a multicenter study.

Authors:  K W A Göttgens; P T J Janssen; J Heemskerk; F M H van Dielen; J L M Konsten; T Lettinga; A G M Hoofwijk; H J Belgers; L P S Stassen; S O Breukink
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Long-term outcomes in patients after ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract.

Authors:  Jens Osterkamp; Peter Gocht-Jensen; Kirsten Hougaard; Tyge Nordentoft
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.240

7.  Long-term outcome following mucosal advancement flap for high perianal fistulas and fistulotomy for low perianal fistulas: recurrent perianal fistulas: failure of treatment or recurrent patient disease?

Authors:  S J van der Hagen; C G Baeten; P B Soeters; W G van Gemert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Fistula-in-ano: when to cut, tie, plug, or sew.

Authors:  Robert Beaulieu; David Bonekamp; Corinne Sandone; Susan Gearhart
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Long-term functional outcome and risk factors for recurrence after surgical treatment for low and high perianal fistulas of cryptoglandular origin.

Authors:  Paul J van Koperen; Jan Wind; Willem A Bemelman; Roel Bakx; Johannes B Reitsma; J Frederik M Slors
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing fistulectomy versus fistulotomy for low anal fistula.

Authors:  Yansong Xu; Siyuang Liang; Weizhong Tang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-10-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Is the Goligher classification a valid tool in clinical practice and research for hemorrhoidal disease?

Authors:  L Dekker; I J M Han-Geurts; U Grossi; G Gallo; R Veldkamp
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.699

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.