Literature DB >> 33859462

Amputation Care Quality and Satisfaction With Prosthetic Limb Services: A Longitudinal Study of Veterans With Upper Limb Amputation.

Linda Resnik1, Matthew Borgia1, Sarah Ekerholm1, M Jason Highsmith1, Billie Jane Randolph1, Joseph Webster1, Melissa A Clark1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study sought to measure and identify factors associated with satisfaction with care among veterans. The metrics were colelcted for those receiving prosthetic limb care at the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and US Department of Defense (DoD) care settings and at community-based care providers.
METHODS: A longitudinal cohort of veterans with major upper limb amputation receiving any VA care from 2010 to 2015 were interviewed by phone twice, 1 year apart. Care satisfaction was measured by the Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey (OPUS) client satisfaction survey (CSS), and prosthesis satisfaction was measured by the OPUS client satisfaction with device (CSD), and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scale satisfaction scales. The Quality of Care index, developed for this study, assessed care quality. Bivariate analyses and multivariable linear regressions identified factors associated with CSS. Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney rank tests and Fisher exact tests compared CSS and Quality of Care items at follow-up for those with care within and outside of the VA and DoD.
RESULTS: The study included 808 baseline participants and 585 follow-up participants. Device satisfaction and receipt of amputation care in the prior year were associated with greater satisfaction with care quality. Persons with bilateral amputation were significantly less satisfied with wait times. Veterans who received amputation care in the VA or DoD had better, but not statistically different, mean (SD) CSS scores: 31.6 (22.6) vs 39.4 (16.9), when compared with those who received care outside the VA or DoD. Those with care inside the VA or DoD were also more likely to have a functional assessment in the prior year (33.7% vs 7.1%, P = .06), be contacted by providers (42.7% vs 18.8%, P = .07), and receive amputation care information (41.6% vs 0%, P =.002). No statistically significant differences in CSS, Quality of Care scores, or pain measures were observed between baseline and follow-up. In regression models, those with higher CSD scores and with prior year amputation care had higher satisfaction when compared to those who had not received care.
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with prosthetic limb care is associated with device satisfaction and receipt of care within the prior year. Veterans receiving amputation care within the VA or DoD received better care quality scores than those receiving prosthetic care outside of the VA or DoD. Satisfaction with care and quality of care were stable over the 12 months of this study. Findings from this study can serve as benchmarks for future work on care satisfaction and quality of amputation rehabilitative care.
Copyright © 2021 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33859462      PMCID: PMC8040957          DOI: 10.12788/fp.0096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fed Pract        ISSN: 1078-4497


  12 in total

1.  The Promise of Assistive Technology to Enhance Work Participation.

Authors:  Alan M Jette
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2017-07-01

2.  Guest editorial: Department of Veterans Affairs Amputations System of care:5 years of accomplishments and outcomes.

Authors:  Joseph B Webster; Cindy E Poorman; David X Cifu
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Department of Veterans Affairs Polytrauma Telerehabilitation: Twenty-First Century Care.

Authors:  Joel Scholten; Cindy Poorman; Lesli Culver; Joseph B Webster
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 1.784

4.  Factor structure of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb amputations.

Authors:  Deirdre M Desmond; Malcolm MacLachlan
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Comparison of satisfaction with current prosthetic care in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts with major traumatic limb loss.

Authors:  Gary M Berke; John Fergason; John R Milani; John Hattingh; Martin McDowell; Viet Nguyen; Gayle E Reiber
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2010

6.  Clinic Use at the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs Following Combat Related Amputations.

Authors:  Ted Melcer; Jay Walker; Vibha Bhatnagar; Erin Richard
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments.

Authors:  A W Heinemann; R K Bode; C O'Reilly
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Guideline compliance in chronic heart failure patients with multiple comorbid diseases: evaluation of an individualised multidisciplinary model of care.

Authors:  Tam H Ho; Gillian E Caughey; Sepehr Shakib
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A national study of Veterans with major upper limb amputation: Survey methods, participants, and summary findings.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; Sarah Ekerholm; Matthew Borgia; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of Veterans with upper limb amputation.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; Matthew Borgia; Allen W Heinemann; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.