Literature DB >> 33859381

Sensory feedback for limb prostheses in amputees.

Stanisa Raspopovic1, Giacomo Valle2, Francesco Maria Petrini2.   

Abstract

Commercial prosthetic devices currently do not provide natural sensory information on the interaction with objects or movements. The subsequent disadvantages include unphysiological walking with a prosthetic leg and difficulty in controlling the force exerted with a prosthetic hand, thus creating health issues. Restoring natural sensory feedback from the prosthesis to amputees is an unmet clinical need. An optimal device should be able to elicit natural sensations of touch or proprioception, by delivering the complex signals to the nervous system that would be produced by skin, muscles and joints receptors. This Review covers the various neurotechnological approaches that have been proposed for the development of the optimal sensory feedback restoration device for arm and leg amputees.

Year:  2021        PMID: 33859381     DOI: 10.1038/s41563-021-00966-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Mater        ISSN: 1476-1122            Impact factor:   43.841


  11 in total

Review 1.  Artificial referred sensation in upper and lower limb prosthesis users: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Gonzalez; Alex Bismuth; Christina Lee; Cynthia A Chestek; Deanna H Gates
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  In vivo closed-loop control of a locust's leg using nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Francisco Zurita; Fulvia Del Duca; Tetsuhiko Teshima; Lukas Hiendlmeier; Michael Gebhardt; Harald Luksch; Bernhard Wolfrum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Spatio-temporal feature extraction in sensory electroneurographic signals.

Authors:  C Silveira; R N Khushaba; E Brunton; K Nazarpour
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.019

4.  EEG Features of Evoked Tactile Sensation: Two Cases Study.

Authors:  Changyu Qin; Wenyuan Liang; Dian Xie; Sheng Bi; Chih-Hong Chou
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 5.  Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human-Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics.

Authors:  Wenzheng Heng; Samuel Solomon; Wei Gao
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 32.086

6.  Preliminary Evaluation of the Effect of Mechanotactile Feedback Location on Myoelectric Prosthesis Performance Using a Sensorized Prosthetic Hand.

Authors:  Eric D Wells; Ahmed W Shehata; Michael R Dawson; Jason P Carey; Jacqueline S Hebert
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  The Use of the Velocity Selective Recording Technique to Reveal the Excitation Properties of the Ulnar Nerve in Pigs.

Authors:  Felipe Rettore Andreis; Benjamin Metcalfe; Taha Al Muhammadee Janjua; Winnie Jensen; Suzan Meijs; Thomas Gomes Nørgaard Dos Santos Nielsen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Biorealistic Control of Hand Prosthesis Augments Functional Performance of Individuals With Amputation.

Authors:  Qi Luo; Chuanxin M Niu; Chih-Hong Chou; Wenyuan Liang; Xiaoqian Deng; Manzhao Hao; Ning Lan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Multisensory stimulation decreases phantom limb distortions and is optimally integrated.

Authors:  Gaia Risso; Greta Preatoni; Giacomo Valle; Michele Marazzi; Noëlle Moana Bracher; Stanisa Raspopovic
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-21

10.  Cognitive benefits of using non-invasive compared to implantable neural feedback.

Authors:  Lauren Chee; Giacomo Valle; Greta Preatoni; Chiara Basla; Michele Marazzi; Stanisa Raspopovic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.