Literature DB >> 33857569

Clinical characterization of radiation-associated muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Sybil T Sha1, Edward Christopher Dee2, Matthew Mossanen3, Brandon A Mahal4, Cierra Zaslowe-Dude2, Trevor J Royce2, Michelle S Hirsch5, Guru Sonpavde6, Mark A Preston7, Paul L Nguyen2, Kent W Mouw2, Vinayak Muralidhar2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the presentation, patterns of care, and outcomes of radiation-associated muscle-invasive bladder cancer (RA-MIBC) compared to primary (non-radiation associated) MIBC. RA-MIBC has been suggested to represent a more aggressive disease variant and be more difficult to treat compared to primary (non-radiation associated) MIBC.
METHODS: We identified 60,090 patients diagnosed with MIBC between 1988-2015 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and stratified patients based on whether radiation had been administered to a prior pelvic primary cancer. We used Fine-Gray competing risks regression to compare adjusted bladder cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) for RA-MIBC compared to primary MIBC.
RESULTS: There were 1,093 patients with RA-MIBC and 58,997 patients with primary MIBC. RA-MIBCs were more likely to be T4 at diagnosis (21.0% vs 17.3%, P < .001), and less likely to be node-positive (10.3% vs 17.1%, P < .001). The rate of 5-year BCSM was significantly higher for patients with RA-MIBC vs primary MIBC (56.1% vs 35.3%, AHR 1.24, P < .001), even after stratification by other tumor, treatment and patient-specific factors.
CONCLUSION: RA-MIBCs tended to present with higher grade and T stage disease and were less likely to receive curative treatment. Even when accounting for stage, grade, and receipt of treatment, patients with RA-MIBC had worse survival compared to those with primary MIBC. These findings suggest that RA-MIBC present unique clinical challenges and may also represent a biologically more aggressive disease compared to primary MIBC. Future research is needed to better understand the biology of RA-MIBC and develop improved treatment approaches.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33857569     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  2 in total

1.  Secondary malignancy after radiotherapy: not always a secondary concern.

Authors:  Vishruth K Reddy; Neha Vapiwala
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Genomic Features of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Arising After Prostate Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew Mossanen; Filipe L F Carvalho; Vinayak Muralidhar; Mark A Preston; Brendan Reardon; Jake R Conway; Catherine Curran; Dory Freeman; Sybil Sha; Guru Sonpavde; Michelle Hirsch; Adam S Kibel; Eliezer M Van Allen; Kent W Mouw
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 24.267

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.