Literature DB >> 33857557

Selective aortic arch perfusion versus open cardiac massage in exsanguination cardiac arrest: A comparison of coronary pressure dynamics in swine.

Joseph Edwards1, Hossam Abdou1, Marta J Madurska1, Neerav Patel1, Michael J Richmond1, David Poliner1, Joseph M White2, Todd E Rasmussen2, Thomas M Scalea1, Jonathan J Morrison3.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the mean aortic-right atrial pressure (AoP-RAP) gradients and mean coronary perfusion pressures (CPPs) observed during open cardiac massage (OCM) versus those obtained with selective aortic arch perfusion (SAAP) in post-mortem hypovolemic swine.
METHODS: Post-mortum, male swine, utilized in prior studies of hemorrhage, were included in the study. Animals were bled ∼25-50% of circulating volume prior to death. Animals either underwent clamshell thoracotomy and OCM immediately after death was confirmed (n = 6) or underwent SAAP within 5-15 min of death (n = 6). Aortic root and right atrial pressures were recorded continuously during each method of resuscitation using solid state blood pressure catheters. Representative five beat samples were extracted; short, similarly timed segments of SAAP were also extracted. Mean AoP-RAP gradient and CPPs were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Mean AoP-RAP gradient and CPP were significantly higher in SAAP animals compared to OCM animals (mean ± SD; 29.1 ± 8.4 vs. 24.5 ± 5.0, p < 0.001; 28.9 ± 8.5 vs. 9.9 ± 6.0, p < 0.001). Mean CPP was not significantly different from mean AoP-RAP gradient in SAAP animals (p = 0.92); mean CPP was significantly lower than mean AoP-RAP gradient in OCM animals (p < 0.001). While 97% of SAAP segments had a CPP > 15 mmHg, only 17% of OCM segments had a CPP > 15 mmHg (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: SAAP appears to create a more favorable and efficient hemodynamic profile for obtaining ROSC when compared to OCM in this preclinical porcine study.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac massage; Coronary perfusion pressure; Internal massage; Open cardiac massage; SAAP; Selective aortic arch perfusion

Year:  2021        PMID: 33857557     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  1 in total

1.  Open chest selective aortic arch perfusion vs open cardiac massage as a means of perfusion during in exsanguination cardiac arrest: a comparison of coronary hemodynamics in swine.

Authors:  Joseph Edwards; Hossam Abdou; Neerav Patel; Eric Lang; Michael J Richmond; Todd E Rasmussen; Thomas M Scalea; Jonathan J Morrison
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.693

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.