Literature DB >> 33857492

The Impact of Center Volume on Outcomes in Lung Transplantation.

Zhizhou Yang1, Melanie P Subramanian1, Yan Yan2, Bryan F Meyers1, Benjamin D Kozower1, G Alexander Patterson1, Ruben G Nava1, Ramsey R Hachem3, Chad A Witt3, Michael K Pasque1, Derek E Byers3, Hrishikesh S Kulkarni3, Daniel Kreisel1, Akinobu Itoh1, Varun Puri4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies in lung transplantation have shown variable association between hospital volume and clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify the pattern of effect of hospital volume on individual patient survival after lung transplantation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis using the United Network for Organ Sharing national thoracic organ transplantation database. Adult patients who underwent lung transplantation between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. The association between mean annual center volume and 1-year overall survival was examined using restricted cubic splines in a random effects multivariable Cox model. The volume threshold for optimal 1-year overall survival was subsequently approximated by the maximum likelihood approach using segmented linear splines in the same model.
RESULTS: The study included 10,007 patients at 71 transplant centers. Median annual center volume was 22 cases (interquartile range, 10.6 to 38). A center volume threshold was identified at 33 cases per year (95% confidence interval, 28 to 37). Higher center volume, to 33 cases per year, was associated with better 1-year survival (hazard ratio 0.989, 95% confidence interval, 0.980 to 0.999 every additional case). Further increase in center volume above 33 cases per year showed no additional benefit (hazard ratio 1.000, 95% confidence interval, 0.996 to 1.003 every additional case). Twenty-three centers (32.4%) reached the volume threshold of 33 cases per year.
CONCLUSIONS: One-year survival after lung transplantation improved with increasing center volume to as many as 33 cases per year. Low volume centers below the 33 cases per year threshold had large variations in their outcomes and had a higher risk of performing poorly, although many of them maintained good performance.
Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33857492      PMCID: PMC8505551          DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.03.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  24 in total

1.  Medicare program; hospital conditions of participation: requirements for approval and re-approval of transplant centers to perform organ transplants. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2007-03-30

2.  Estimating regression models with unknown break-points.

Authors:  Vito M R Muggeo
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Temporal trends in lung transplant center volume and outcomes in the United States.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Kyla M Bennett; Robert D Davis; Shu S Lin; Elizabeth T Tracy; Paul C Kuo; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Lung transplantation and beyond: continued challenges in the wake of significant progress.

Authors:  Norihisa Shigemura
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Regionalization and Outcomes of Lung Cancer Surgery in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Anna M Bendzsak; Nancy N Baxter; Gail E Darling; Peter C Austin; David R Urbach
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-fifth adult lung and heart-lung transplant report-2018; Focus theme: Multiorgan Transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel C Chambers; Wida S Cherikh; Samuel B Goldfarb; Don Hayes; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Alice E Toll; Kiran K Khush; Bronwyn J Levvey; Bruno Meiser; Joseph W Rossano; Josef Stehlik
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 10.247

7.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.

Authors:  H S Luft; J P Bunker; A C Enthoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Simulated Regionalization of Heart and Lung Transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  J T Magruder; A S Shah; T C Crawford; J C Grimm; B Kim; J B Orens; E L Bush; R S Higgins; C A Merlo
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Regionalization of Lung Cancer Surgery Improves Outcomes in an Integrated Health Care System.

Authors:  Sora Ely; Sheng-Fang Jiang; Ashish R Patel; Simon K Ashiku; Jeffrey B Velotta
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Regionalization of thoracic surgery improves short-term cancer esophagectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Sora Ely; Amy Alabaster; Simon K Ashiku; Ashish Patel; Jeffrey B Velotta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.895

View more
  1 in total

1.  Could global surgery overcome a decline in surgical cases?

Authors:  Robert B Laverty; Rahul M Jindal
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.