Literature DB >> 33856977

Prevalence of Self-Reported Intake of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Among US Adults in 50 States and the District of Columbia, 2010 and 2015.

Jennifer R Chevinsky1,2,3, Seung Hee Lee1, Heidi M Blanck1, Sohyun Park1.   

Abstract

Frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is associated with adverse health outcomes, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. We used combined data from the 2010 and 2015 National Health Interview Survey to examine the prevalence of SSB intake among US adults in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Approximately two-thirds of adults reported consuming SSBs at least daily, including more than 7 in 10 adults in Hawaii, Arkansas, Wyoming, South Dakota, Connecticut, and South Carolina, with significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics. Efforts to decrease SSB consumption could consider the sociodemographic and geographic differences in SSB intake when designing equitable interventions.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33856977      PMCID: PMC8051857          DOI: 10.5888/pcd18.200434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis        ISSN: 1545-1151            Impact factor:   2.830


What is already known about this topic?

Frequent intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) is associated with adverse health consequences. SSB intake differs by geographical region and sociodemographic characteristics.

What is added by this report?

We report SSB intake by state for all 50 states and the District of Columbia along with notable geographic and sociodemographic differences.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Efforts to decrease SSB intake could consider sociodemographic and geographic differences in SSB intake to inform design of interventions.

Objective

Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a leading source of added sugars in the US diet and are associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, kidney disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and tooth decay (1–4). SSBs, which are sweetened with various forms of added sugars, include regular soda, sweetened fruit drinks, sports/energy drinks, and sweetened coffee/tea drinks (5). Previous studies reported geographic differences in SSB intake (6–8). However, no study has reported SSB intake for every state. We assessed the prevalence of SSB intake among US adults by sociodemographic characteristics for all 50 states and the District of Columbia by using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data.

Methods

NHIS is a nationally representative, cross-sectional household survey conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) that uses in-person interviews. The Cancer Control Supplement (CCS), which contains dietary intake information, was administered both in 2010 and in 2015 and was approved by the NCHS Research Ethics Review Board. We used nationally weighted data from combined 2010 and 2015 NHIS CCS to examine the prevalence of consuming SSBs 1 or more times daily among 56,260 US adults aged 18 or older. Data were combined to increase the sample size and reduce the variability associated with state estimates. This study required the use of restricted NHIS files for state estimates and categorizing metropolitan status available through the NCHS Research Data Center. SSB intake was based on survey respondents’ answers to 4 questions asking about intake frequency over the past month of regular soda, sweetened fruit drinks, sports/energy drinks, and sweetened coffee/tea drinks (9,10). Sweetened fruit drinks and sweetened coffee/tea drinks included drinks that were presweetened in addition to drinks that were sweetened at home by adding sugar. Adults responded with intake frequency per day, week, or month for each beverage type. Weekly and monthly intake frequency for each type of beverage was converted to daily intake frequency by dividing by 7 or 30, respectively. To calculate frequency of total daily SSB intake, we summed responses from intake of regular soda, sweetened fruit drinks, sports/energy drinks, and sweetened coffee/tea drinks. SSB categories and frequency cutoff of once per day were used, consistent with previous studies (6,7). Differences in respondent characteristics were assessed by χ2 tests (P < .05). Prevalence estimates were calculated for SSB categories and by state for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Analyses were conducted with SAS-callable SUDAAN, version 9.0 (RTI) to account for a complex survey design and sampling weights.

Results

Overall, 63.0% of US adults reported consuming SSBs 1 or more times daily in combined 2010 and 2015 NHIS CCS data (Table 1). US adults reported consuming the following 1 or more times daily, by beverage type: sweetened coffee/tea drinks, 39.5%; regular soda, 19.5%; fruit drinks, 5.7%; and sports/energy drinks, 5.5%. Among sociodemographic categories with significant differences overall, the prevalence of SSB intake was highest among adults aged 18 to 24 (65.0%) and 25 to 39 (65.4%), men (66.1%), Hispanic respondents (70.1%), people with less than a high school education (69.8%), people with an annual household income less than $35,000 (66.0%), people residing in nonmetropolitan areas (65.0%), and people residing in the Northeast census region (67.0%). The prevalence of SSB intake did not significantly differ by marital status.
Table 1

Prevalence of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Once Daily or More Among US Adults Aged 18 or Older (N = 56,260), National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement, 2010 and 2015a

CharacteristicNo. Respondents≥1 Time/d, Weighted % (95% CI)b
Overall 56,26063.0 (62.4–63.6)
Age, yb
18–245,35865.0 (63.3–66.7)
25–3915,02765.4 (64.4–66.3)
40–5919,14362.8 (61.8–63.7)
≥6016,73259.7 (58.6–60.8)
Sexb
Male25,14866.1 (65.3–67.0)
Female31,11260.0 (59.3–60.8)
Race/ethnicityb
White, non-Hispanic33,48861.4 (60.7–62.2)
Black, non-Hispanic8,23864.3 (63.0–65.7)
Hispanic9,98470.1 (68.7–71.4)
Other, non-Hispanic4,55060.5 (58.5–62.5)
Marital status
Married/domestic partnership28,07962.7 (61.9–63.4)
Not married28,18163.5 (62.7–64.3)
Educationb
<High school8,71269.8 (68.5–71.0)
High school/GED14,35867.3 (66.2–68.3)
Some college17,20062.8 (61.8–63.8)
College graduate15,99056.4 (55.4–57.4)
Annual household income, $b
<35,00023,66566.0 (65.2–66.9)
35,000–74,99917,06164.3 (63.3–65.3)
75,000–99,9995,74461.8 (60.1–63.4)
≥100,0009,79057.7 (56.4–59.0)
Metropolitan/nonmetropolitan statusb , c
Metropolitan46,62362.7 (62.0–63.3)
Nonmetropolitan9,63765.0 (63.2–66.7)
Census regionb , d
Northeast9,08467.0 (65.5–68.4)
Midwest12,10058.3 (57.0–59.7)
South20,07265.2 (64.2–66.1)
West15,00461.1 (59.9–62.2)

Data are for 50 states and the District of Columbia. The type of SSBs consumed was based on survey respondents’ answers to 4 questions: 1) “During the past month, how often did you drink regular soda or pop that contains sugar? Do not include diet soda.”; 2) “During the past month, how often did you drink sweetened fruit drinks, such as Kool-Aid, cranberry, and lemonade? Include fruit drinks you made at home and added sugar to.”; 3) “During the past month, how often did you drink sports and energy drinks such as Gatorade, Red Bull, and vitamin water?”; and 4) “During the past month, how often did you drink coffee or tea that had sugar or honey added to it? Include coffee and tea you sweetened yourself and presweetened tea and coffee drinks such as Arizona Iced Tea and Frappuccino. Do not include artificially sweetened coffee or diet tea.”

Significant difference in the prevalence of SSB intake once daily or more across levels of the characteristic at the P < .05 level based on χ2 test.

Based on National Center for Health Statistics Urban–Rural Classification Scheme for Counties (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm). Metropolitan includes large central metro, large fringe metro, medium metro, and small metro categories. Nonmetropolitan includes micropolitan and noncore categories.

US Census Bureau–defined regions: Northeast (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont); Midwest (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin); Southern (Alabama, Arkansas; Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia); and Western (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming).

Data are for 50 states and the District of Columbia. The type of SSBs consumed was based on survey respondents’ answers to 4 questions: 1) “During the past month, how often did you drink regular soda or pop that contains sugar? Do not include diet soda.”; 2) “During the past month, how often did you drink sweetened fruit drinks, such as Kool-Aid, cranberry, and lemonade? Include fruit drinks you made at home and added sugar to.”; 3) “During the past month, how often did you drink sports and energy drinks such as Gatorade, Red Bull, and vitamin water?”; and 4) “During the past month, how often did you drink coffee or tea that had sugar or honey added to it? Include coffee and tea you sweetened yourself and presweetened tea and coffee drinks such as Arizona Iced Tea and Frappuccino. Do not include artificially sweetened coffee or diet tea.” Significant difference in the prevalence of SSB intake once daily or more across levels of the characteristic at the P < .05 level based on χ2 test. Based on National Center for Health Statistics Urban–Rural Classification Scheme for Counties (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm). Metropolitan includes large central metro, large fringe metro, medium metro, and small metro categories. Nonmetropolitan includes micropolitan and noncore categories. US Census Bureau–defined regions: Northeast (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont); Midwest (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Wisconsin); Southern (Alabama, Arkansas; Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia); and Western (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, Wyoming). By state, SSB intake of 1 or more times daily ranged from 44.5% in Alaska to 76.4% in Hawaii. These 6 states had a prevalence of daily SSB intake of 70.0% or more: Hawaii (76.4%), Arkansas (74.2%), Wyoming (73.2%), South Dakota (72.5%), Connecticut (72.2%), and South Carolina (70.2%). Only 1 state, Alaska (44.5%), had a daily intake prevalence below 50.0% (Table 2). Most states had a daily intake prevalence between 50.0% and 70.0% (Figure).
Table 2

Prevalence by State of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Once Daily or More Among US Adults Aged 18 or Older, National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement, 2010 and 2015

StateNo. RespondentsWeighted % (95% CI)a
Nation overall56,26063.0 (62.4–63.6)
Alabama81365.0 (60.2–69.6)
Alaska46944.5 (40.3–48.8)
Arizona89864.5 (59.6–69.1)
Arkansas60274.2 (70.2–77.8)
California6,62862.7 (61.0–64.3)
Colorado88259.4 (55.0–63.6)
Connecticut65272.2 (67.8–76.3)
Delaware46368.0 (60.5–74.6)
District of Columbia56364.8 (57.5–71.4)
Florida3,18467.2 (65.2–69.2)
Georgia1,54868.1 (65.1–70.9)
Hawaii51676.4 (73.9–78.7)
Idaho53158.8 (55.0–62.5)
Illinois1,94662.7 (59.5–65.8)
Indiana1,03465.7 (61.0–70.2)
Iowa75250.5 (44.3–56.7)
Kansas81554.9 (51.5–58.3)
Kentucky89367.2 (62.0–72.0)
Louisiana78768.7 (65.2–71.9)
Maine63865.5 (63.6–67.3)
Maryland83065.4 (61.3–69.3)
Massachusetts85866.8 (62.7–70.7)
Michigan1,43759.0 (55.1–62.8)
Minnesota98550.4 (46.2–54.7)
Mississippi67464.5 (61.8–67.0)
Missouri87159.1 (55.4–62.7)
Montana46764.9 (63.4–66.3)
Nebraska61458.0 (54.6–61.3)
Nevada76063.8 (58.4–68.8)
New Hampshire52669.7 (66.9–72.3)
New Jersey1,22069.5 (65.6–73.2)
New Mexico72868.5 (65.8–71.1)
New York2,70165.6 (63.1–68.1)
North Carolina1,51162.7 (59.0–66.2)
North Dakota50659.2 (53.8–64.5)
Ohio1,71657.2 (54.1–60.3)
Oklahoma66966.0 (59.1–72.3)
Oregon70851.5 (48.6–54.4)
Pennsylvania1,72765.9 (62.6–69.0)
Rhode Island39065.7 (58.1–72.6)
South Carolina73970.2 (64.6–75.4)
South Dakota51572.5 (69.0–75.7)
Tennessee90966.4 (61.2–71.2)
Texas4,22762.5 (60.3–64.6)
Utah73453.6 (49.1–58.1)
Vermont37267.3 (64.6–69.8)
Virginia1,09759.6 (56.1–63.0)
Washington1,18555.0 (51.9–58.0)
West Virginia56359.4 (55.8–62.9)
Wisconsin90950.4 (46.6–54.2)
Wyoming49873.2 (67.7–78.0)

The type of SSBs consumed was based on survey respondents’ answers to 4 questions: 1) “During the past month, how often did you drink regular soda or pop that contains sugar? Do not include diet soda.”; 2) “During the past month, how often did you drink sweetened fruit drinks, such as Kool-Aid, cranberry, and lemonade? Include fruit drinks you made at home and added sugar to.”; 3) “During the past month, how often did you drink sports and energy drinks such as Gatorade, Red Bull, and vitamin water?”; and 4) “During the past month, how often did you drink coffee or tea that had sugar or honey added to it? Include coffee and tea you sweetened yourself and presweetened tea and coffee drinks such as Arizona Iced Tea and Frappuccino. Do not include artificially sweetened coffee or diet tea.”

Figure

Prevalence of self-reported sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake once daily or more among US adults by state, National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement (NHIS CCS), 2010 and 2015. SSBs include regular soda, sweetened fruit drinks, sports/energy drinks, and sweetened coffee/tea drinks. This map shows combined 2010 and 2015 data from the NHIS CCS (9,10).

The type of SSBs consumed was based on survey respondents’ answers to 4 questions: 1) “During the past month, how often did you drink regular soda or pop that contains sugar? Do not include diet soda.”; 2) “During the past month, how often did you drink sweetened fruit drinks, such as Kool-Aid, cranberry, and lemonade? Include fruit drinks you made at home and added sugar to.”; 3) “During the past month, how often did you drink sports and energy drinks such as Gatorade, Red Bull, and vitamin water?”; and 4) “During the past month, how often did you drink coffee or tea that had sugar or honey added to it? Include coffee and tea you sweetened yourself and presweetened tea and coffee drinks such as Arizona Iced Tea and Frappuccino. Do not include artificially sweetened coffee or diet tea.” Prevalence of self-reported sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake once daily or more among US adults by state, National Health Interview Survey Cancer Control Supplement (NHIS CCS), 2010 and 2015. SSBs include regular soda, sweetened fruit drinks, sports/energy drinks, and sweetened coffee/tea drinks. This map shows combined 2010 and 2015 data from the NHIS CCS (9,10).

Discussion

Daily SSB intake is common among US adults and is particularly high in some states and among some populations. The prevalence in our study was higher than in the 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey (8). This discrepancy may be explained by differences in the types of SSBs assessed, modes of survey administration, methods of collecting dietary intake data, and representativeness. Previous NHIS, NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey), and BRFSS data also showed that SSB consumption is higher among young adults, men, adults in nonmetropolitan counties, and people with low levels of education (6–8,11). The prevalence of SSB consumption in previous studies was high in the Northeast (7) and in southern states (6), consistent with our study’s findings. The high northeastern prevalence may be due to high consumption of sweetened coffee or tea drinks (7). Data from the 2017 BRFSS survey (8) for 12 states, and data from the 2013 BRFSS survey (6) for 23 states also revealed state-specific differences in SSB intake. Reasons for state differences may reflect demographic differences. States and communities may also differ in SSB marketing (12), pricing, and access to alternatives. Our study has several limitations, including self-reported information, assessment of intake frequency without volume or amount of SSBs, age of the data, and combination of data. Declines in SSB intake have occurred over time (13). Combining data may mask changes in prevalence in the study period. Regardless, ours is the first study to our knowledge to examine SSB intake frequency for all 50 states and the District of Columbia by using a nationally representative sample of US adults. Our findings highlight that prevalence of daily SSB intake remains high among US adults, with sociodemographic and geographic differences. Efforts to decrease SSB intake could consider the higher intake prevalence in sociodemographic and geographic subpopulations to aid design and targeting of equitable interventions.
StatePrevalence %
Alabama65.0
Alaska44.5
Arizona64.5
Arkansas74.2
California62.7
Colorado59.4
Connecticut72.2
Delaware68.0
District of Columbia64.8
Florida67.2
Georgia68.1
Hawaii76.4
Idaho58.8
Illinois62.7
Indiana65.7
Iowa50.5
Kansas54.9
Kentucky67.2
Louisiana68.7
Maine65.5
Maryland65.4
Massachusetts66.8
Michigan59.0
Minnesota50.4
Mississippi64.5
Missouri59.1
Montana64.9
Nebraska58.0
Nevada63.8
New Hampshire69.7
New Jersey69.5
New Mexico68.5
New York65.6
North Carolina62.7
North Dakota59.2
Ohio57.2
Oklahoma66.0
Oregon51.5
Pennsylvania65.9
Rhode Island65.7
South Carolina70.2
South Dakota72.5
Tennessee66.4
Texas62.5
Utah53.6
Vermont67.3
Virginia59.6
Washington55.0
West Virginia59.4
Wisconsin50.4
Wyoming73.2
  10 in total

1.  Prevalence of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Among Adults--23 States and the District of Columbia, 2013.

Authors:  Sohyun Park; Fang Xu; Machell Town; Heidi M Blanck
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 17.586

2.  What foods are US supermarkets promoting? A content analysis of supermarket sales circulars.

Authors:  Jennifer Martin-Biggers; Meredith Yorkin; Carena Aljallad; Caroline Ciecierski; Ivbaria Akhabue; Jessica McKinley; Katherine Hernandez; Courtney Yablonsky; Rachel Jackson; Virginia Quick; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Trends in Beverage Consumption Among Children and Adults, 2003-2014.

Authors:  Sara N Bleich; Kelsey A Vercammen; Jonathan Wyatt Koma; Zhonghe Li
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.002

4.  Sugar-sweetened Beverage Consumption Among U.S. Adults, 2011-2014.

Authors:  Asher Rosinger; Kirsten Herrick; Jaime Gahche; Sohyun Park
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2017-01

Review 5.  Fructose and Cardiometabolic Health: What the Evidence From Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Tells Us.

Authors:  Vasanti S Malik; Frank B Hu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  Vasanti S Malik; Barry M Popkin; George A Bray; Jean-Pierre Després; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Sugar-sweetened beverages and dental caries in adults: a 4-year prospective study.

Authors:  Eduardo Bernabé; Miira M Vehkalahti; Aubrey Sheiham; Arpo Aromaa; Anna L Suominen
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Regional Differences in Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake among US Adults.

Authors:  Sohyun Park; Lisa C McGuire; Deborah A Galuska
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.910

9.  Sugar-sweetened soda consumption, hyperuricemia, and kidney disease.

Authors:  Andrew S Bomback; Vimal K Derebail; David A Shoham; Cheryl A Anderson; Lyn M Steffen; Wayne D Rosamond; Abhijit V Kshirsagar
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Among Adults, by Residence in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Counties in 12 States and the District of Columbia, 2017.

Authors:  Omoye Imoisili; Sohyun Park; Elizabeth A Lundeen; Liping Pan; Terry O'Toole; Karen R Siegel; Heidi M Blanck
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.830

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Large State Variation in Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Purchases: What We Learn from the Beverage Industry Data.

Authors:  Tatiana Andreyeva
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 2.  How have media campaigns been used to promote and discourage healthy and unhealthy beverages in the United States? A systematic scoping review to inform future research to reduce sugary beverage health risks.

Authors:  Vivica I Kraak; Katherine Consavage Stanley; Paige B Harrigan; Mi Zhou
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 10.867

3.  Reported Changes in Eating Habits Related to Less Healthy Foods and Beverages during the COVID-19 Pandemic among US Adults.

Authors:  Sohyun Park; Seung Hee Lee; Amy L Yaroch; Heidi M Blanck
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.