Literature DB >> 33856962

Source apportionment of PM2.5 at IMPROVE monitoring sites within and outside of marine vessel fuel sulfur emissions control areas.

Robert A Kotchenruther1.   

Abstract

Fuel sulfur emissions control areas have been established in a few marine coastal regions to reduce environmental impacts from combustion of high sulfur residual fuel oil (RFO). For example, in August of 2012, the U.S. began enforcing fuel sulfur limits on certain large commercial marine vessels up to 200 nautical miles (nm) of its coasts as part of a North American Emissions Control Area (NA-ECA), and in January of 2014, the U.S. began enforcing fuel sulfur limits on these vessels within up to 50 nm of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands as part of the U.S. Caribbean Sea ECA (USCAR-ECA). This work evaluates ECA effectiveness at reducing PM2.5 from combustion of RFO by using both spatial analysis, comparing PM2.5 source apportionment at IMPROVE monitoring sites largely impacted by air from either inside or outside of an ECA, along with temporal analysis, comparing RFO combustion impacts pre and post ECA enforcement at sites largely impacted by air from inside an ECA. Source apportionment was performed using Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) on chemically speciated PM2.5 data from 2009 to 2018. Results for 7 coastal U.S. IMPROVE sites influenced by marine air masses within the NA-ECA showed an annual mean reduction of PM2.5 from RFO combustion of 79.0% (range, 60.2% to 91.5%) when comparing impacts from the pre-ECA (RFO average 2.7% S) period of 2009-2011 to the ECA 0.1% fuel S period of 2015-2018. In contrast, the Virgin Islands, Big Bend, and Baengnyeong Island South Korea IMPROVE sites were impacted by RFO combustion and were largely or wholly influenced by air masses from outside of an emissions control area. These sites saw a statistically significant 14.0% increase, a 21.0% decrease, or no statistically significant change, respectively, when comparing time periods pre and post ECA enforcement.Implications: This study performs source apportionment on PM2.5 monitoring data to identify 10 sites impacted by residual fuel oil combustion, mainly from marine vessel fuel use. The paper then evaluates the effects of enforcement of marine vessel fuel sulfur emissions control areas at reducing ambient impacts of this source on PM2.5. This study uses both temporal analysis of the source apportionment results, comparing source impacts before and after enforcement of marine vessel fuel sulfur emissions control areas, and spatial analysis, comparing source impacts between sites largely impacted or not impacted by airmasses originating inside of marine vessel fuel sulfur emissions control areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33856962      PMCID: PMC8437104          DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1917463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.636


  9 in total

1.  Mitigating the health impacts of pollution from oceangoing shipping: an assessment of low-sulfur fuel mandates.

Authors:  J J Winebrake; J J Corbett; E H Green; A Lauer; V Eyring
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  U.S. national PM2.5 Chemical Speciation Monitoring Networks-CSN and IMPROVE: description of networks.

Authors:  Paul A Solomon; Dennis Crumpler; James B Flanagan; R K M Jayanty; Ed E Rickman; Charles E McDade
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Methods for estimating uncertainty in PMF solutions: examples with ambient air and water quality data and guidance on reporting PMF results.

Authors:  Steven G Brown; Shelly Eberly; Pentti Paatero; Gary A Norris
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Microscopic characterization of individual particles from multicomponent ship exhaust.

Authors:  Olga Popovicheva; Elena Kireeva; Natalia Persiantseva; Mikhail Timofeev; Henrike Bladt; Natalia P Ivleva; Reinhard Niessner; Jana Moldanová
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2012-10-23

5.  Lichen-based critical loads for atmospheric nitrogen deposition in Western Oregon and Washington Forests, USA.

Authors:  Linda H Geiser; Sarah E Jovan; Doug A Glavich; Matthew K Porter
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 8.071

6.  Benefits of two mitigation strategies for container vessels: cleaner engines and cleaner fuels.

Authors:  M Yusuf Khan; Michael Giordano; James Gutierrez; William A Welch; A Asa-Awuku; J Wayne Miller; David R Cocker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Chronic exposure to fine particles and mortality: an extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study from 1974 to 2009.

Authors:  Johanna Lepeule; Francine Laden; Douglas Dockery; Joel Schwartz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Epidemiological time series studies of PM2.5 and daily mortality and hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R W Atkinson; S Kang; H R Anderson; I C Mills; H A Walton
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs.

Authors:  Mikhail Sofiev; James J Winebrake; Lasse Johansson; Edward W Carr; Marje Prank; Joana Soares; Julius Vira; Rostislav Kouznetsov; Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen; James J Corbett
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 14.919

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.