Monika Kijewska1, Miłosz Siczek1, Miłosz Pawlicki1,2. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Wrocław, F. Joliot-Curie 14, 50383 Wrocław, Poland. 2. Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30387 Kraków, Poland.
Abstract
A macrocyclic motif composed of carbazole and pyridine subunits linked by a carbonyl bridge (C═O) forms a skeleton with a peripheral reactivity that leads to a pinacol-like coupling activated by BBr3, eventually entrapping a substantially elongated C-C bond. Slightly modified conditions lead to the efficient transformation of the C═O unit to a CH2 linker that, after exposure to air, gives a dimeric molecule with multiple bonds between two macrocyclic units, as documented in spectroscopy and X-ray analysis.
A macrocyclic motif composed of carbazole and pyridine subunits linked by a carbonyl bridge (C═O) forms a skeleton with a peripheral reactivity that leads to a pinacol-like coupling activated by BBr3, eventually entrapping a substantially elongated C-C bond. Slightly modified conditions lead to the efficient transformation of the C═O unit to a CH2 linker that, after exposure to air, gives a dimeric molecule with multiple bonds between two macrocyclic units, as documented in spectroscopy and X-ray analysis.
The precise design of novel
structural motifs with envisioned properties remains the central theme
of logic in chemistry. Such structures, apart from potential applications,
often provide platforms for the exploration and development of novel
concepts in fundamental aspects such chemical bonding or potential
reactivity. The formation of unsaturated macrocycles that keep local
conjugation opens a specific set of options for postsynthetic transformation[1] in addition to opening new frontiers of reactivity.
Pyridine-incorporated structures are reported as motifs where both
types of behavior have been observed to show global conjugation[2] or to keep local effects[3] and postsynthetic modifications.[4] The
coordination plays an important role in macrocycles, strongly modulating
the observed behavior, including the formation of dimeric motifs driven
by coordination[5] that can lead to μ-oxo-dimers.[6] The linking of two
monomeric macrocycles into covalently bound skeletons was realized
via a transition-metalcatalyst[7] or with
a standard condensation approach.[8] As reported
to date, the triheterocyclic/carbocyclic systems linked with carbon
bridges form a perfect environment for binding boron(III), which effectively
interacts with carbon[9] or nitrogen[10] but also stabilizes a global effect of antiaromatic
delocalization.[11] However, the triangular
shape of the macrocyclic environment that is predefined for binding
boron(III)can create different sets of donors very efficiently, utilizing
the electron deficiency of the central ion and leading to the intriguing
modulation of the final skeleton, while the global delocalization
is disturbed and the local influences are crucial.[1,4] Following
these observations, here we report the studies of the precisely designed
and synthesized macrocycle constructed of heterocyclic subunits linked
with a carbonyl (C=O) unit, showing two reactivities distinguished
as internal and peripheral.In our approach, we applied Suzuki–Miyaura coupling as a
versatile tool for the formation of π-extended molecules,[9−12] and it is also applicable for the synthesis of macrocycles.[13] Both required reagents 1 and 2 were obtained as previously described[14,15] and subjected to palladium-catalyzed coupling (Scheme , path a),
eventually giving macrocycle 3 in 20% yield. As documented
in the 1H NMR analysis (Figure A), 3 remains locally aromatic
according to the magneticcriterion,[18] with
a downfield-shifted line of H(3,20) at δ 8.18. The recorded
spectroscopic properties are consistent with rather negligible macrocyclic
delocalization compared with other structures of similar size[9−12] but also containing pyridine and carbazole.[16] The lack of macrocyclic delocalization is consistent with the presence
of the carbonyl linker documented in the 13C NMR (δ
187.1) that efficiently blocks the delocalization. The final structure
shows a strongly downfield-shifted internal proton of the NH group
(δ 18.48), proving the proximity of three nitrogencenters and
a strong hydrogen bond responsible for the significant deshielding
of hydrogen.[4,17] The presence of three nitrogen
donors in a confined macrocyclicconstruction similar to triphyrinscreates a perfect environment for small cations such as boron(III).[10,11] The reaction of 3 with boron(III) tribromide (BBr3) in the presence of triethyl amine (Et3N), applied
as a neutralizing medium, showed the internal variant
of reactivity (Scheme , path b). The LC-MS analysis of the reaction mixture
showed an m/z peak at 486.2330,
consistent with that of monomeric skeleton 4a with a
hydroxy axial ligand isolated in 28% yield. A deeper analysis of the
reaction mixture showed the presence of doubly charged motif at m/z 477.2288 (+2), eventually assigned
to μ-oxo-dimer 5 (Scheme ). The formation of oxygen-bridged
structures was reported for different cations including transition
metals[6a] and metalloids.[6b] As documented, the formation of 5 was observed
in the presence of Et3N, which activates the axial hydroxy
ligand at the boron(III)center. Importantly, 5 can be
also directly obtained from 4a (Scheme , path e) in 45% yield.
The insertion of B(III) does not change the local character of aromaticity
observed in 4a, as documented by 1H NMR (Figure B). The presence
of a carbonyl unit in both derivatives 4a and 5 was proved by the 13Cchemical shifts observed at δ
177.0 and δ 176.1, respectively. 4 showed a specific
pattern of pyridine resonances with a significantly downfield-shifted
line of H(3,20) (δ 9.54 (4a)), whereas 5 relocated the pyridine resonances H(3,20) up-field to δ 9.16
(Figure S39).
Scheme 1
Synthetic Approach
Conditions: (a) 1 (1
equiv), 2 (1 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (0.1
equiv), K2CO3 (3 equiv), KF (4 equiv),
toluene/DMF, 110 °C, 72 h. (b) BBr3 (10 equiv), Et3N (13 equiv), toluene, reflux, Ar, 2 h. (c) BBr3 (10 equiv), toluene, reflux, Ar, 2 h. (d) BBr3 (10 equiv), o-dichlorobenzene, reflux, Ar, 2 h. (e) Zn(Hg), CDCl3, Ar, 24 h (incubation 12 h, 60°C). (f) O2, 24 h.
Figure 1
1H NMR spectra of 3 (A,
chloroform-d), 4a (B, acetone-d6), and 6 (C, acetone-d6)
(600 MHz, 300 K).
Synthetic Approach
Conditions: (a) 1 (1
equiv), 2 (1 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (0.1
equiv), K2CO3 (3 equiv), KF (4 equiv),
toluene/DMF, 110 °C, 72 h. (b) BBr3 (10 equiv), Et3N (13 equiv), toluene, reflux, Ar, 2 h. (c) BBr3 (10 equiv), toluene, reflux, Ar, 2 h. (d) BBr3 (10 equiv), o-dichlorobenzene, reflux, Ar, 2 h. (e) Zn(Hg), CDCl3, Ar, 24 h (incubation 12 h, 60°C). (f) O2, 24 h.1H NMR spectra of 3 (A,
chloroform-d), 4a (B, acetone-d6), and 6 (C, acetone-d6)
(600 MHz, 300 K).While dissolved in acetone-d6, both
positively charged boron(III) complexes 4 and 5 efficiently accommodate one molecule of acetone via an enolation
of acetone that acts as a nucleophile toward the carbonyl unit, forming
an sp3-hybridized carbon and showing peripheral reactivity.
The 13C NMR spectra showed the formation of a tetrahedral
carbon for the conversion of 4a (δ 75.9 4-Ac), whereas the reaction of 5 gave
two types of carbons (δ 176.1 and δ 75.4), proving the
accommodation of one molecule of acetone in 5-Ac (Figure ). The significant difference in both positions (Figure S46) is consistent with keeping the sp2carbonyl
in one subunit and changing the hybridization to sp3 in
the second one.
Figure 2
Acetone adducts of 4-Ac and 5-Ac.
Acetone adducts of 4-Ac and 5-Ac.The X-ray analysis performed for 3 confirmed stericconfinements resulting in the proximity of three nitrogen donors (Figure A), and the distances
observed within the coordination cavity are consistent with a strong
N–H···N hydrogen bond responsible for the substantial
downfield shift of H(23) in the 1H NMR spectrum.[4,17] Crystal structures confirmed the presence of carbonyl units in 3 and 4a (Figure A,B; C(1)–O(1) bond lengths 1.223(3) and 1.217(6)
Å, respectively) and the tetrahedral geometry of C1 in 4a-Ac (Figure C). The boron(III) environment in 4a and 4a-Ac showed the pyramidal organization of
donors with characteristic bond lengths (Figure ) and a hydroxyl group as an axial ligand.
The crystal structure of 5-Ac (see the Supporting Information) showed the presence of
both types of subunits, confirming the formation of another C–C
bond (Figure S105).
Figure 3
Molecular structures
of 3 (A, thermal ellipsoids present
30% probability), 4a (B, thermal ellipsoids present 50%
probability), and 4-Ac (C, thermal ellipsoids
present 50% probability). Counter ions, solvents, and hydrogen atoms
are removed for clarity.
Molecular structures
of 3 (A, thermal ellipsoids present
30% probability), 4a (B, thermal ellipsoids present 50%
probability), and 4-Ac (C, thermal ellipsoids
present 50% probability). Counter ions, solvents, and hydrogen atoms
are removed for clarity.The reactivity at the
carbonyl unit observed in 4 and 5 consistently
suggested the potential toward the formation
of new carbon–carbon bonds, opening a path for the peripheral reactivity (Scheme ). Carbonyl units are effective substrates
for reactions like pinacolcoupling, which consists of a reduction
step crucial for the formation of a C–C bond and requiring
the employment of transition metals.[7,20] The reaction
of 3 with boron(III) tribromide (BBr3, excess) without triethyl amine (Scheme , path c) gave a product
that showed a doubly charged peak at m/z = 469.2311 as a major component accompanied by a substantially smaller
amount of 4a and a second doubly charged structure with
an m/z peak at 470.2381 (Figure S80).The isotopic patterns recorded
for both doubly charged fractions
were consistent with the presence of two boron(III)cations. The NMR
analysis with substantially different patterns of resonances in the 1H spectrum compared with 4a with noticeably upfield-relocated
pyridine lines (Figure C) and the presence of an sp3carbon (13C δ
84.5, Figure S56) connected to a heteroatom
allowed us to suggest the expected structure for the major fraction
to be 6 (Scheme ) stabilizing a pinacol motif. The second dimeric structure,
eventually identified as 8 (Scheme ), showed a substantially different spectroscopic
pattern consistent with a double bond linking two macrocyclic subunits.
The X-ray analysis of 6 (Figure A) confirmed the conclusions derived from
spectroscopic data. An sp3-hybridized carbon in a pinacol-like
motif that coordinates to boron(III)centers (Figure A) was observed. The boron(III) environment
(B–N(22) (1.573(6) Å), B–N(23) (1.432(6) Å)
and B–N(24) 1.569(6) Å) was comparable to that for 4a and also that for other B(III)–N interactions. Both
macrocyclic subunits are linked via two B–O–Cconnections
that keep two sp3-hybridized C(1) atoms in an orientation
that forms a C–C bond with a length of 1.659(6) Å, which
is noticeably longer than regular sp3–sp3 interaction.[19] The Wiberg index calculated
for the elongated C–C bond (0.8416) confirmed the decreased
bond order, consistent with the observed length. The crystal structure
of 8 (Figure B) confirmed the presence of a significantly shorter C–C
bond (1.354(4) and 1.344(4) Å for two independent molecules in
a crystal cell) characteristic of a double interaction. Both dimeric
structures were stable and could be kept in solution for several weeks
while protected from the air. Unprotected from the air, the sample
of 6 in methanol(methanol-d4) or the mixture of acetonitrile/water quantitatively converted to 4b(4c) or 4a, respectively (Figures S89 and S90), which can explain the presence
of 4a in the reaction mixture. Under the same conditions, 8 remained intact.
Figure 4
Crystal structures of 6 (A) and 8 (B)
(thermal ellipsoids at 30% probability). Counter ions, solvents, and
hydrogen atoms are removed for clarity.
Crystal structures of 6 (A) and 8 (B)
(thermal ellipsoids at 30% probability). Counter ions, solvents, and
hydrogen atoms are removed for clarity.The UV–vis properties consistently support the limited global
delocalization, showing a negligible change when comparing all derivatives
(Figure S99). The NH dynamic substantially
affects the emission[21] that is not observed
for 3 but is detectable for boron(III) complexes (Figure S103) and recorded at λ = 506 (4a), 510 (6), and 511 nm (8).The plausible mechanism leading to 6 involves the
dimerization of monomers 3 activated by BBr3, leading to a tetracationic skeleton (Scheme ), followed by a reductive C–C bond
formation. The applied conditions do not introduce any obvious source
of electrons; however, Br– was reported as an electron-transfer
medium acting as a reducing agent in multicharged skeletons.[23a] Thus an excess of bromide anions plays a crucial
role in dimerization, and the observed behavior shows the influence
of the introduction of positive charges to the system followed by
the electron transfer that reflects some analogy to the proton-coupled
electron transfer (PCET).[23]
Scheme 2
Potential
Mechanism in Two Variants for the Reductive Coupling of
Carbonyls Activated with BBr3
tBu is not
present for clarity.
Potential
Mechanism in Two Variants for the Reductive Coupling of
Carbonyls Activated with BBr3
tBu is not
present for clarity.While looking at 6 and 8, it can be concluded
that both dimeric structures can be interconverted by a redox process.
Nevertheless, all reduction attempts to convert 6 to 8 were met with failure, suggesting a separate path. Because
we did not observe the formation of 8 under the first
conditions (with Et3N), we decided to modify the synthetic
approach leading to 6 by extending the reaction time
to 12 h of reflux in toluene. This gave 6 as a dominating
component, accompanied by 4a and 8. The
LC-MS analysis showed an additional monocationiccompound at an m/z signal of 472.2553 that vanishes after
exposure to air with a simultaneous increase in the amount of 4a and 8 (Figure S95), suggesting a correlation between these species. By using a highly
boiling solvent (o-dichlorobenzene) for the same
process (Scheme ,
path d), we observed the formation of 472.2553 as
a single product that was eventually assigned to the reduced skeleton 7 (Scheme ) containing a −CH2– bridge instead of a
carbonyl unit (Figures S96 and S97). As
reported by Newkome and coworkers, a −CH2–
group flanked by two pyridines is highly reactive and leads to dimerization,[16d,22] similar to our observations where 7 converts to 8 (Scheme , path f). A potential approach to reduce the carbonyl
unit to form 7 can be presented with similarities to
the classicClemmensen reduction (Scheme S2) with the involvement of Br– as an electron-transfer
agent. Both reductive processes leading to 6 and 7 should have similar origins, as both derivatives were observed
under similar conditions. Thus while looking at the optimized conditions,
we can say that depending on the presence of triethyl amine, the predominant
formation of monomeric (with Et3N) or dimeric (without
Et3N) boron(III) complexescan be observed. In addition,
the different reaction temperatures can be applied to form either 6 or 8 (via 7).In conclusion,
a rationally obtained macrocycle armed with peripherally
located carbonyl functionality undergoes a BBr3-activated
conversion that, depending on the applied conditions, gives monomeric
or dimericboron(III) complexes. The dimerization gives a pinacol-like
coupling of two subunits with the stabilization of the elongated C–C
bond, as documented in the X-ray analysis. With slightly modified
conditions, two macrocycles form a double bond that bridges both subunits.
The presented approach, with the possibility of controlling the type
of reactivity, shows that the precise design of the skeleton opens
the potential for controlled conversion to highly appreciated motifs
linking π-extended systems into more complex structures. Further
experiments toward this reactivity are under way in our lab.
Authors: Peter R Schreiner; Lesya V Chernish; Pavel A Gunchenko; Evgeniya Yu Tikhonchuk; Heike Hausmann; Michael Serafin; Sabine Schlecht; Jeremy E P Dahl; Robert M K Carlson; Andrey A Fokin Journal: Nature Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Hemant Gopee; Xiangfei Kong; Zhiqun He; Isabelle Chambrier; David L Hughes; Graham J Tizzard; Simon J Coles; Andrew N Cammidge Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 4.354