Marzena Zając1, Paulina Pająk2, Gabriela Skowyra1. 1. Department of Animal Product Technology, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Cracow, Kraków, Poland. 2. Department of Food Analysis and Quality Assessment, Faculty of Food Technology, University of Agriculture in Cracow, Kraków, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bovine hide underlayer is used to manufacture collagen casings for sausage production. Edible collagen casings and natural ovine casing (as a reference) were chosen for analysis. The collagen casings (intended for: A - breakfast sausages, B - scalded sausages and C - dried sausages) were manufactured with the use of glyoxal as a cross-linking agent. The casings properties along with the quality of the sausages manufactured in those casings was analyzed. RESULTS: Casing A had a higher swelling capacity and water solubility, a* and b* color parameters, and wet elongation at break values, as well as a lower shrinking temperature. The remaining mechanical and water parameters were comparable to other collagen casings. The ovine casing contained more water, and was redder and less yellow compared to the collagen casings, whereas swelling, solubility and water vapor permeability were higher. The sausages in casing A were the softest and had the highest a* and b* color parameters. The results of the sensory analysis indicate that the sausages in casing B exhibited the highest quality on a three-point scale among the tested sausages and were also the most acceptable for judges. The ovine casing was graded as the hardest during cutting and also when in the mouth. CONCLUSION: By contrast to the producer's descriptions, the collagen casings were similar with respect to many properties. The differences between sausages in collagen casings were not so distinct as might be expected. Despite our expectations, the sausages in the natural casing were not rated as the best compared to sausages in collagen casings in the sensory analysis.
BACKGROUND:Bovine hide underlayer is used to manufacture collagen casings for sausage production. Edible collagen casings and natural ovine casing (as a reference) were chosen for analysis. The collagen casings (intended for: A - breakfast sausages, B - scalded sausages and C - dried sausages) were manufactured with the use of glyoxal as a cross-linking agent. The casings properties along with the quality of the sausages manufactured in those casings was analyzed. RESULTS: Casing A had a higher swelling capacity and water solubility, a* and b* color parameters, and wet elongation at break values, as well as a lower shrinking temperature. The remaining mechanical and water parameters were comparable to other collagen casings. The ovine casing contained more water, and was redder and less yellow compared to the collagen casings, whereas swelling, solubility and water vapor permeability were higher. The sausages in casing A were the softest and had the highest a* and b* color parameters. The results of the sensory analysis indicate that the sausages in casing B exhibited the highest quality on a three-point scale among the tested sausages and were also the most acceptable for judges. The ovine casing was graded as the hardest during cutting and also when in the mouth. CONCLUSION: By contrast to the producer's descriptions, the collagen casings were similar with respect to many properties. The differences between sausages in collagen casings were not so distinct as might be expected. Despite our expectations, the sausages in the natural casing were not rated as the best compared to sausages in collagen casings in the sensory analysis.