Literature DB >> 33855598

Assessing in-hospital morbidity after urethroplasty using the European Association of Urology Quality Criteria for standardized reporting.

Marco Bandini1,2,3, Guido Barbagli4,5, Riccardo Leni6, Giuseppe O Cirulli6, Giuseppe Basile6, Sofia Balò5, Francesco Montorsi6, Salvatore Sansalone7, Andrea Salonia6, Alberto Briganti6, Denis Butnaru8, Massimo Lazzeri9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To conduct a rigorous assessment of in-hospital morbidity after urethroplasty according with the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for complication reporting.
METHODS: We retrospectively (2015-2019) identified 469 consecutive patients receiving urethroplasty (e.g. bulbar urethroplasty with grafts, penile urethroplasty with/without grafts/flaps, Johanson, de novo or revision perineostomy, end-to-end anastomosis, meatoplasty and/or meatotomy) at our tertiary care institution. Complications were graded with Clavien-Dindo score and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Complications were classified in: bleeding no gastrointestinal, cardiac, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, infectious, neurological, oral, wound, miscellaneous, and pulmonary. Logistic regression tested for predictors of in-hospital complications and prolonged hospitalization (> 75th percentile). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression investigated the effect of complications on failure after urethroplasty.
RESULTS: Overall, 161 (34.3%) patients experienced at least one complication. Of those, 47 (10%) experienced two or more complications and 59 (12.6%) experienced at least one Clavien-Dindo ≥ II complication. Only two patients had Clavien-Dindo III complications. Infectious was the most frequent complication, and de novo or revision perineostomy was associated with the highest rate of complications. The occurrence of any complications, as well as complication with Clavien-Dindo ≥ II were associated with prolonged hospitalizations, but not with higher rates of post-urethroplasty failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Complications after urethroplasty were common events, but rarely with severe sequelae. Infectious were the most common complications and perineostomy was the type of urethroplasty with the highest rate of complications. The application of the EAU recommendations allowed the identifications of a higher number of complications after urethroplasty if compared with previous reports based on unsupervised chart review.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clavien; Complications; Dindo; EAU guidelines; Methodology; Urethroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33855598     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03692-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  26 in total

1.  Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations.

Authors:  Dionysios Mitropoulos; Walter Artibani; Markus Graefen; Mesut Remzi; Morgan Rouprêt; Michael Truss
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Development and content validation of the Urethroplasty Training and Assessment Tool (UTAT) for dorsal onlay buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty.

Authors:  Sara Jasionowska; Majed Shabbir; Oliver Brunckhorst; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Hussain Manzoor; Prokar Dasgupta; Paul Anderson; Guido Barbagli; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Validation of the Clavien-Dindo Grading System in Urology by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Ad Hoc Panel.

Authors:  Dionysios Mitropoulos; Walter Artibani; Chandra Shekhar Biyani; Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen; Morgan Rouprêt; Michael Truss
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-03-07

4.  Improving Estimates of Perioperative Morbidity After Radical Cystectomy Using the European Association of Urology Quality Criteria for Standardized Reporting and Introducing the Comprehensive Complication Index.

Authors:  Malte W Vetterlein; Jakob Klemm; Philipp Gild; Marlon Bradtke; Armin Soave; Roland Dahlem; Margit Fisch; Michael Rink
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Murray F Brennan; David P Jaques
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Repair of sphincter urethral strictures preserving urinary continence: surgical technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Guido Barbagli; Sanjay B Kulkarni; Pankaj M Joshi; Dmitriy Nikolavsky; Francesco Montorsi; Salvatore Sansalone; Carla Loreto; Massimo Lazzeri
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  The Impact of Implementation of the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel Recommendations on Reporting and Grading Complications on Perioperative Outcomes after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giorgio Gandaglia; Carlo Andrea Bravi; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Elio Mazzone; Nicola Fossati; Simone Scuderi; Daniele Robesti; Francesco Barletta; Luca Grillo; Steven Maclennan; James N'Dow; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Quality assessment of partial nephrectomy complications reporting using EAU standardised quality criteria.

Authors:  Dionysios Mitropoulos; Walter Artibani; Chandra Shekhar Biyani; Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen; Mesut Remzi; Morgan Rouprêt; Michael Truss
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Substitution Urethroplasty with Closure Versus Nonclosure of the Buccal Mucosa Graft Harvest Site: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a Detailed Analysis of Oral Pain and Morbidity.

Authors:  Armin Soave; Roland Dahlem; Hans O Pinnschmidt; Michael Rink; Jessica Langetepe; Oliver Engel; Luis A Kluth; Birte Loechelt; Philip Reiss; Sascha A Ahyai; Margit Fisch
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Patient-reported outcomes for typical single cheek harvesting vs atypical lingual, labial or bilateral cheeks harvesting: a single-center analysis of more than 800 patients.

Authors:  Guido Barbagli; Marco Bandini; Sofia Balò; Francesco Montorsi; Salvatore Sansalone; Mauro De Dominicis; Denis Butnaru; Massimo Lazzeri
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dorsal approach for double-face bulbar urethroplasty: ventral inlay plus dorsal onlay using Kulkarni one-side dissection.

Authors:  Cristina Ballesteros Ruiz; Marco Bandini; Pankaj M Joshi; Sandeep Bafna; Vipin Sharma; Shreeranga L Yatam; Shreyas Bhadranavar; Amey Patil; Sanjay B Kulkarni
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Graft Plus Fasciocutaneous Penile Flap for Nearly or Completely Obliterated Long Bulbar and Penobulbar Strictures.

Authors:  Pankaj M Joshi; Marco Bandini; Sandeep Bafna; Vipin Sharma; Amey Patil; Shreyas Bhadranavar; Christian Yepes; Guido Barbagli; Francesco Montorsi; Sanjay B Kulkarni
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-11-25

3.  Mucosal-sparing augmented non-transected anastomotic (MsANTA) urethroplasty: a step forward in ANTA urethroplasty.

Authors:  Pankaj Joshi; Marco Bandini; Sanjay B Kulkarni
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 5.969

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.