Literature DB >> 33855412

Correlation between the burden of family caregivers and health status of people with diabetes mellitus.

Niko Dima Kristianingrum1, Dian Azizah Ramadhani1, Yati Sri Hayati1, Setyoadi Setyoadi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Family caregivers play an important role in providing long-term care for people with diabetes mellitus because it is a chronic disease that requires critical attention. This increases the burden of family caregivers which affects the health status of people with this disease. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the correlation between the burden of family caregivers and the health status of people with diabetes mellitus.  Design and methods: This is an analytic observational study which was carried out in the work area ofpublic health centers in Malang City using a cross-sectional design approach. The subjects used were 327 people with diabetes mellitus and their families were selected using the cluster sampling technique. Data collection was carried out using demographic data instruments, Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) questionnaire to measure the burden of family caregivers and the SF 12 questionnaire to measure the health status of people with diabetes mellitus.
RESULTS: The results of the Spermank-Rank statistical test showed that there was a negative relationship between the burden of family caregivers and the health status of people with diabetes mellitus (p-value 0.000 and coefficient value of -0.333).
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that the lesser the burden on family caregivers, the better the health status of people with diabetes mellitus. Therefore, interventions are needed to reduce the burden of family caregiver and improve the health status of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33855412      PMCID: PMC8129740          DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Res        ISSN: 2279-9028


Introduction

Approximately 415 million people worldwide suffered from diabetes in 2015 and it later increased to 463 million in 2019. It was estimated that the number of people suffering from diabetes mellitus would increase to 578 million by 2030 and 700 million by 2045.[1] Furthermore, Indonesia was ranked sixth position for DM patients in the word with a total number of 10.3 million in 2017.[2] Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic degenerative and noncommunicable diseases caused by abnormal insulin secretion and characterized by high blood sugar levels in the body.[2] Being a chronic disease, diabetes requires long-term treatment and it's sufferers need some changes in their lifestyle, such as adjusting their diet intake, taking medications and exercising regularly. DM patients experience dependence on others because of their decreased mental and physical functions. Therefore, they need to get support from family members in order to carry out their activities that are useful in controlling their blood sugar levels.[3] The family can act as a family caregiver to help people with T2DM manage their diseases.[4] A Family caregiver is a family member that provides primary care or help to meet the needs of sick family members. It could be a relative, spouse, adult child, friend, or neighbors that has a personal relationship with the family. Furthermore, they are also individuals that provides various unpaid assistance to someone either suffering from a chronic or debilitated condition, or has limitations in their physical, mental, or cognitive functioning.[5] A family caregiver is someone that is responsible for providing physical, emotional, and financial supports to family members that are unable to take care of themselves due to illness, injury or disability.[6] Caregiving is not a new role in the family because people have always provided emotional, physical, and financial support to family members and others that they are close to. What has changed in the past three decades is the number of individuals that take on this role, the duration and intensity of the care provided, and the complexity of the care delivered.[6] The role or duty of family caregivers include assisting in personal care and mobility, performing caring tasks, performing household duties and solving financial problems. The number of tasks that family caregivers need to perform creates a feeling of burden for them, which is commonly referred to as the caregiver burden.[7] The high burden of family caregivers makes them susceptible to physical and mental health problems such as sleep difficulties, insomnia, pain, headaches, chest pain and depression.[8] It was stated in a research that 66.7% and 22.5% of family caregivers experience both an objective subjective family burdens when caring for DM patients. Most family members are heavily burdened in caring for DM sufferers due to difficulties in performing longterm home care. Excessive stress, duties and responsibilities experienced by caregivers have a negative impact on DM patients. This is because the stress experienced could be an obstacle in performing their roles as caregivers thereby having a negative impact on the health status of people with this disease.[9] The quality of people’s life could be used in determining their health status.[10] Furthermore, the Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is one of the most widely measured treatment outcomes to self-assess the effects of the management of chronic disease on health. It also used to monitor the physical, psychological and social aspects of personal health that is influenced by an individual expectations, beliefs, perceptions and experiences.[11] However, for chronic diabetes patients, a complete cure would not be achieved.[12] Clinical measures could be used to provide a good estimate of disease control, however the ultimate aim of managing diabetes is preventing the patient’s QOL from getting worse.[12] The health status of DM patients need to be measured, because it is the main goal in the treatment of chronic incurable diseases.[13] The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the burden of family caregivers and the health status of people with diabetes mellitus in Malang City.

Design and Methods

This is a quantitative study that made use of observational analytic methods using a cross-sectional design. The population were 1787 diabetes mellitus patients and their family caregivers. The cluster random sampling method was used in collecting data from 327 people with diabetes mellitus and their family caregiver in all of the Public Health Centers in Malang City. The family caregiver inclusion criteria were those that live in the same houses with diabetes mellitus patients, more than 17 years old, could read and write, and understands the Indonesian language. Furthermore, the inclusion criteria for people with diabetes mellitus were those that could read and write, understands the Indonesian language, lives in the same houses with family caregivers, and registered at the public health center as those undergoing outpatient care. Data was collected from January to March 2020 using demographic data instruments, Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) questionnaires to measure the burden of family caregivers and the SF 12 questionnaire to measure the health status of DM patients. This study got ethical approval from the Health Ethic Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya with ethical clearance number 06/EC/KEPK/01/2020. The participants were given an informed consent before participating in this study.

Results and discussions

The results showed that the demographic characteristics of family caregivers were mostly less than 45 years (48.3%), had high school education (48.6%), self-employed/private occupation (57.5%), and relationships with DM sufferers that are children (47.1%). It was found that patients with diabetes mellitus based on the demographic characteristics in this study were mostly 45-65 years old (63.3%), females (80.4%), had elementary level education (51.7%), and not working (68.8%). The demographic characteristics of DM clients are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.

Characteristics of family caregivers and people with diabetes mellitus.

Demographic characteristicsFamily caregiversPeople with diabetes mellitus
n%n%
Age
    <45 years old15848.3%72.1%
    45-65 years old12337.6%20763.3%
    >65 years old4614.1%11334.6%
Gender
    Male16851.4%6419.6%
    Female15948.6%26380.4%
Last education
    No school10.3%20.6%
    Elementary school7121.7%16951.7%
    Middle school5416.5%7623.2%
    Senior high school15948.6%6519,9%
    Undergraduate or postgraduate4212.8%154.6%
Occupation
    Not employed12036.7%22568.8%
    Labor92.8%30.9%
    Farmers10.3%00%
    Civil servants72,1%30.9%
    Army / police20.6%10.3%
    Others18857.5%9529.1%
Relationship
    Husband and wife15346.8%
    Child15447.1%
    Son in law30.9%
    Sister61.8%
    Niece10.3%
    Grandchild92.8%
    Mother10.3%
The burdens of family caregivers were mostly in the little-no burden category (91.4%), and none of the respondent experienced any burden in the heavy category. Each domain of the burden of family caregivers showed that the physical burden and family relationships with patients with a value of 97.2% were placed in the low category. Furthermore, the economic burden had a low value of 99.4%. All the respondents were placed in the low category in the social burden domain, and 99.7% in the emotional burden domain (Table 2).
Table 2.

Domain of family caregiver burden.

DomainLowHigh
n%n%
Objective burden
    Physical31897.2%92.8%
    Economy32599.4%20.6%
    Social327100%0%
    Relationship with patients31897.2%92.8%
Subjective burden
    Emotional32699.7%10.3%
Characteristics of family caregivers and people with diabetes mellitus. The health status of people with DM were mostly in the good health status category (90.8%). Each domain of health status, on the physical dimensions consisting of physical function and role, body pain and general health perception mostly had values in the good category of the physical function domain (94.8%) (Table 3). Furthermore, the not good category of physical dimensions had the highest value in the domain of public health perception. The mental dimensions consist of emotional roles, vitality, mental wellbeing and social functions and had values in the good category of the mental welfare domain (98.8%), while the not good category of the mental dimension had the highest value in the vitality domain (29.7%).
Table 3.

Domain of health status of people with diabetes mellitus.

DomainLowHigh
n%n%
Physical dimension
    Physical function31094.8%175.2%
    Physical role27985.3%4814.7%
    Body pain29690.5%319.5%
    General perception18255.7%14543.3%
Mental dimension
    Emotional role30192%268%
    Vitality23070.3%9729.7%
    Mental wellness32398.8%41.2%
    Social function32198.2%61.8
Table 4 showed the majority of family caregivers in the no-little burden category and people with DM that had good health status (85.3%). Furthermore, 6.1% of family caregivers were in the no-little burden category in conjunction with people suffering from DM that had poor health status. The Spearman-Rank test results found a correlation between the burden of caregivers and the health status of people with diabetes mellitus (p=0.000). Based on the results of the statistical tests, a coefficient value -0.333 was obtained which means that the lesser the burden on family caregivers, the better the health status of people with diabetes mellitus and vice versa with moderate correlation (Table 5).
Table 4.

Cross-tabulation of the burden of family caregivers and the health status of diabetes mellitus patients.

Cross-tabulationHealth status of people with diabetes mellitus
GoodNot good
n%n%
Family caregiver burdenNo-little burden27985.3 %206.1%
Mild to moderate burden185.5%103.1%
Table 5.

Correlation analysis between the burden of family caregivers and the health status of diabetes mellitus patients.

Variablep-valueCorrelation coefficientInterpretation
Family caregiver burden-health status0.000-0.333Moderate correlation
The results showed that 91.4% of family caregivers were in the no-little burden category. Furthermore, the burden of family caregivers is influenced by several factors such as age, sex, education level and job.[5] The family caregivers in this study were mostly less than 45 years old of which at that age they still have a strong physic and are capable of regulating their emotions in order for them to perform their duties well. The majority of respondents were males with low burdens because men have an aggressive nature and tend to be rational compared to women. This supported by study in Nigerian that caregivers of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus experience burden and psychological distress associated with caregiving, especially female caregivers and those taking care of those taking care of patients with complications.[14] In addition, the level of education also affects the burden of caregivers. This is because it determines their workload when caring for sick family member. Caregivers who were less educated and caring for patients with more recent illness appeared relatively vulnerable. [15] Domain of family caregiver burden. Domain of health status of people with diabetes mellitus. Cross-tabulation of the burden of family caregivers and the health status of diabetes mellitus patients. Correlation analysis between the burden of family caregivers and the health status of diabetes mellitus patients. The burden of caregivers is divided into two, namely objective and subjective. The objective load consists of physical, economic, social burdens, and family relationship with the patient. While the subjective consists of only emotional burden.[16,17] Physical burden seen from the caregiver’s health becomes disrupted when caring for family member with DM. Furthermore, 97.2% of the family caregivers had a physical burden in low category. This is because 48.3% of family caregivers that are less than 45 years still carry out daily activities independently. Economic burden is defined as financial problems faced by family caregivers when caring for people with DM. 99.4% of family caregivers experienced economic burdens in the low category because 57.5% of them work as private entrepreneurs. Social burden is defined as the issue on whether family caregivers do not have time to interact with friends or neighbors such as attending social gathering or other activities. All the family caregivers had low social burden when caring for family member with DM and were still actively participating in social activities or going out with friends. This is because their family members suffering from DM had no complications and did not require excessive supervision. Family relationships with members suffering from DM is mainly based on whether they are able or unable to provide better care for them. Family plays a major role in the management of diabetes. Family members can actively support and care for patients with diabetes.[18] Their supportive behaviors are perceived by their family members diagnosed with T1DM, but there has been no optimal association with disease control. However, the involvement of the family can aid in decreasing possible complications of the disease by intervening in critical situations.[19] Furthermore, 44.3% of family caregiver stated that they are able to provide better care for family members with DM and also stated that it is an obligation whenever their family members need more help.[4] Emotional burden is defined as the problems faced by family caregivers when caring for family members with DM and they include stress, anger, and fear. Furthermore, 99.7% of the family caregivers experienced emotional burden in the low category, and 68.6% had feelings of fear for the future of family member with DM, because it is an incurable disease and has various complications when not properly controlled. This result is different from several journals which stated that 34.1% and 31.8% of family members with DM that were placed in the low category experienced both subjective and objective burdens.[20] The results of the journal research obtained from the analysis of the family burden of patients with type 2 DM stated that 66.7% experienced objective burdens in the heavy category, while 70.6% experienced subjective burdens in the moderate category.[21] Recent studies have shown that most people with DM have good health status. However, some factors that may affect their health status include sex, age, education, length of suffering, and occupation. Aging makes it difficult to control blood sugar levels because of the decline in the function of body organs. Female DM patients are more common than men because women experience menopause, therefore the estrogen and progesterone hormones make the cells respond to insulin. The health status of people with DM could be improved depending on their high level of education.[22] In addition, suffering from DM for a long period of time could also affect the health status and anxiety levels of an individual.[23] Apart from these factors, the health status of people with DM could also be seen from their blood sugar levels. Therefore, patients need to maintain their blood sugar levels, especially when is within the normal score (<200 mg/dL) in order to avoid complications. The health status of an individual consists of physical and mental dimensions. The physical dimensions consist of physical functions and roles, body pain, general health perception, while the mental dimensions consist of emotional roles, vitality, mental wellbeing and social functions. The physical function is seen when performing light activities such as leisure walking and climbing stairs whether it is limited or not; 94.8% of people with DM had physical functions in the good category. Furthermore, the physical roles are seen when carrying out a work that could either be completed on time or not, and 85.3% of people with DM had physical functions in the good category. Body pains are usually felt when carrying out daily activities, and 90.5% of people with DM that had body pains were in the good category. General health perception is seen from current situations, and 55.7% of people with DM with this function were placed in the good category.[24] Mental dimensions consist of emotional roles, vitality, mental well-being and social functions. The emotional roles are seen from feelings of anxiety, sadness or distress influence activity, and 92% of people with DM that had emotional roles were placed in the good category. Vitality is seen from whether DM sufferers feel that they have a lot of energy. Furthermore, 70.3% of DM sufferers that had vitality were placed in the good category. Mental well-being is seen from whether DM sufferers either feel calm or hopeless, and 98.8% that had mental well-being were placed in the good category. Social functions are seen from activities such as visiting friends and neighbors, and 98.2% of people with DM had social functions in the good categories. Majority of the family caregiver did not have values in no-little burden category, while health status of people with DM were placed in the good category. The results showed that there was a negative relationship between the burdens of family caregivers and the health status of people with DM. This means that the lesser the burden on family caregivers, the better the health status of people with diabetes mellitus. It also proves that the role of caregivers does not fully affect the health status of DM sufferers. The health status of people with DM is seen from their blood sugar levels, and when its above the normal level or >200 mg/dL it is regarded not favorable. With proper management of DM, blood sugar levels could be controlled by its sufferers and this include maintaining dietary patterns, performing regular physical activities, searching for information about DM and diligently controlling their blood sugar levels and taking medication regularly.[25] The results on physical dimensions had sub-components including 43.4% physical function, 93.3% physical role, 36.7% body pain and 60% general health perception, and they all had unfavorable categories. The physical role had the highest score in the unfavorable category on the physical dimension. Furthermore, 56.7% of the DM patients with ages greater than 65 years could not finish their work on time because they have entered the elderly phase. This phase is characterized by a decrease in physical health which results in DM sufferers becoming tired easily and not completing their work on time. Mental dimensions have sub-components which include 66.7% emotional role, 43.3% vitality, 13.3% mental well-being, and 20% social function. Emotional role had the highest score in the unfavorable category whereby the feeling of anxiety/sadness made the DM sufferers not to complete their work. This is because 56.7% of them were above 65 years old and have entered the elderly phase where they experience changes physically, and psychologically. Adherence to consuming drugs is one of the efforts to control blood glucose level or complications that may result. The success of treating DM apart from using medical procedures such as drug administration is also influenced by diet and exercise patterns to maintain physical fitness. These results are in line with other researches. Furthermore, 41.5% of people with DM have normal blood sugar levels that is greater than 160 mg/dL with adherence to taking medications.[24] In the elderly phase there is a decrease in muscle tone, resulting in the elderly easily fatigued, therefore it is necessary to utilize program activities. Furthermore, chronic disease control program at the health center consists of joint exercise, counseling and blood sugar control which is very necessary for people with DM. This is in line with other research whereby 50.9% of DM patients diligently carried out exercises and had normal blood sugar levels <160 mg/dL16. Regular exercise is very good in regulating blood glucose level, losing weight and also increase HDL cholesterol levels.[20] Diabetes exercise should be carried out by DM patients, because it improves all organs of the human body. Families that render care to their relations suffering from DM stated that they do not feel burdened when carrying out their duties as caregivers because they consider caring for one another as a family task. Families remain active in their social activities with other communities such as social gatherings and treating DM sufferers does not affect this. The burden felt by each caregiver is different because it is influenced by their various perceptions. Furthermore, playing the role of a family caregiver could have a positive or negative impact. Positive influences that arise include being able to improve relationships with sufferers, increasing sense of responsibility, and sharing love and support with them. These results are in line with other studies that found that being a caregiver also increases their personal development and self-esteem. The burden of a family caregiver increases the susceptibility of physical and mental health problems such as sleep difficulties, insomnia, pain, headaches, chest pain and depression.[5] Caregiver stress was negatively associated with physical and mental health. Physical health was positively associated with family/community connectedness and mental health was positively associated with both family support and connectedness.[26] The number of tasks and responsibilities, pressure and stress experienced by caregivers in caring for people with DM would have a negative impact on the patients, because stress experienced can be an obstacle in performing the role of a family caregiver and will have an impact on the health status of DM sufferers.[8]

Conclusions

It was concluded that a negative and moderate correlation exist between the burden of family caregivers and the health status of people with DM that means the lesser the burden on family caregivers, the better the health status of people with diabetes mellitus. Therefore, interventions are needed to reduce the burden of family caregiver and improve the health status of patients with diabetes mellitus.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Family and caregiver needs over the course of the cancer trajectory.

Authors:  Barbara A Given; Charles W Given; Paula R Sherwood
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2012-01-04

2.  Caregiver burden of terminally-ill adults in the home setting.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.857

3.  Caregiving Stress Among American Indians With Type 2 Diabetes: The Importance of Awareness of Connectedness and Family Support.

Authors:  Ashleigh Coser; Kelley J Sittner; Melissa L Walls; Tina Handeland
Journal:  J Fam Nurs       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.818

4.  Diabetes mellitus patients' family caregivers' subjective quality of life.

Authors:  Abdel W Awadalla; Jude U Ohaeri; Shafika A Al-Awadi; Adel M Tawfiq
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 5.  Family interventions to improve diabetes outcomes for adults.

Authors:  Arshiya A Baig; Amanda Benitez; Michael T Quinn; Deborah L Burnet
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Family Caregiving for Older Adults.

Authors:  Richard Schulz; Scott R Beach; Sara J Czaja; Lynn M Martire; Joan K Monin
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Assessing health status in informal schizophrenia caregivers compared with health status in non-caregivers and caregivers of other conditions.

Authors:  Shaloo Gupta; Gina Isherwood; Kevin Jones; Kristel Van Impe
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 8.  Quality of Life in Chronic Disease Patients.

Authors:  Kalliopi Megari
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2013-09-23

9.  Family Support and Its Association with Glycemic Control in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Adwa M AlHaidar; Norah A AlShehri; Munira A AlHussaini
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.011

10.  Burden of Care and Psychological Distress in Primary Caregivers of Patients with Type -2 Diabetes Mellitus in A Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.

Authors:  Adebusola Jane Ogunmodede; Olatunji Abiodun; Alfred Bamiso Makanjuola; John Kola Olarinoye; James Ayodele Ogunmodede; Olubunmi Ideraoluwa Buhari
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2019-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of Type II Diabetes Patients' Caregivers' Burnout Level: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Yousef E Alsaedi; Asim A Almalki; Rakan D Alqurashi; Rami S Altwairqi; Daifallah M Almalki; Khalid M Alshehri; Abdullah A Alamri; Khaled A Alswat
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.168

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.