| Literature DB >> 33855409 |
Kuswantoro Rusca Putra1, Tutut Andayani1, Evi Harwiati Ningrum1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Caring is the major focus of nursing practice, and their behavior has an impact on the quality of patient care, and it is very important that they are satisfied while working. The strong relationship between job satisfaction and nurses caring behavior is well established, and therefore the managers can be encouraged to provide better conditions for nurses' satisfaction. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between job satisfaction and the caring behavior of nurses in the Military Hospital. DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey with a self-assessment questionnaire was carried out from August to December 2019. Participants were 121 nurses working in a military hospital Malang, Indonesia. The data was collected using the Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS) and Caring Behavior Inventory (CBI-24). The data were analyzed using rank Spearman and multiple linear regression.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33855409 PMCID: PMC8129760 DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Public Health Res ISSN: 2279-9028
Characteristics of respondents based on gender, age, education and experience (n=121).
| Characteristics of respondents | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Female | 32 | 26.4% |
| Male | 89 | 73.6% |
| Age | ||
| 20-30 | 53 | 43.8% |
| 31-40 | 50 | 41.3% |
| >40 | 18 | 14.9% |
| Education | ||
| Diploma | 92 | 76% |
| Bachelor | 29 | 24% |
| Experiences (year) | ||
| ≤5 | 48 | 39.7% |
| >5 | 73 | 60.3% |
Distribution of variables job satisfaction (salary, promotion, fringe benefits, contingent rewards, supervision, operation procedure, co-worker, nature of work, communication) and caring behavior (n=121).
| Variables | Mean | Median | Min-Max | SD | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job satisfaction (total) | 4.01 | 3.88 | 3.17-4.83 | 0.45 | 3.93-4.09 |
| Salary | 3.77 | 3.75 | 2.00-5.25 | 0.73 | 3.64-3.90 |
| Promotion | 3.73 | 3.75 | 2.25-5.00 | 0.56 | 3.63-3.83 |
| Fringe benefits | 3.63 | 3.50 | 2.00-4.75 | 0.52 | 3.53-3.72 |
| Contingent rewards | 3.83 | 3.75 | 2.50-5.00 | 0.66 | 3.71-3.95 |
| Supervision | 4.34 | 4.25 | 2.50-6.00 | 0.77 | 4.20-4.48 |
| Operation procedure | 3.16 | 3.25 | 2.00-5.00 | 0.52 | 3.06-3.25 |
| Co-worker | 4.76 | 5.00 | 3.50-5.75 | 0.67 | 4.64-4.88 |
| Nature of work | 4.87 | 4.75 | 3.50-5.75 | 0.53 | 4.77-4.96 |
| Communication | 4.03 | 3.75 | 1.50-6.00 | 0.97 | 3.85-4.20 |
| Caring behavior | 5.16 | 5.08 | 4.21-5.75 | 0.39 | 4.21-5.75 |
SD, standard deviation; Min, minimal; Max, maximal; CI, confidence interval.
Analysis of the relationship between variables total score job satisfaction (salary, promotion, fringe benefits, contingent rewards, supervision, operation procedure, co-worker, nature of work, communication) and caring behavior variables (n=121).
| Variable | Correlation coefficient | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Job satisfaction (total) | 0.26 | 0.003 |
| Salary | 0.02 | 0.824 |
| Promotion | -0.12 | 0.185 |
| Fringe benefits | -0.01 | 0.871 |
| Contingent rewards | 0.21 | 0.019 |
| Supervision | 0.34 | 0.000 |
| Operation procedure | 0.02 | 0.826 |
| Co-worker | 0.24 | 0.006 |
| Nature of work | 0.35 | 0.000 |
| Communication | 0.25 | 0.000 |
Multiple linear regression analysis.
| Independent variable | B | p-value | Adjusted R square | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 4.930 | 0.201 | ||
| Salary | -.184 | -2.281 | 0.024 | |
| Promotion | -.037 | -.517 | 0.606 | |
| Fringe benefits | .013 | .143 | 0.887 | |
| Contingent rewards | -.159 | -2.107 | 0.037 | |
| Supervision | .196 | 2.322 | 0.022 | |
| Operation procedure | -.101 | -1.333 | 0.185 | |
| Co-worker | -.071 | -1.032 | 0.304 | |
| Nature of work | .135 | 1.616 | 0.109 | |
| Communication | .190 | 3.028 | 0.003 |