| Literature DB >> 33855237 |
Aldemar Reyes-Trujillo1, Martha C Daza-Torres1, Carlos A Galindez-Jamioy2, Esteban E Rosero-García3, Fernando Muñoz-Arboleda4, Efrain Solarte-Rodriguez2.
Abstract
Estimating nitrogen (N) concentration in situ is fundamental for managing the fertilization of the sugarcane crop. The purpose of this work was to develop estimation models that explain how N varies over time as a function of three spectral data transformations in two stages (plant cane and first ratoon) under variable rates of N application. A randomized complete-block experimental design was applied, with four levels of N fertilization: 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg N ha-1. Six sampling events were carried out during the rapid growth stage, where the canopy reflectance spectra with a hyperspectral sensor were measured, and tissue samples for N determination in plant cane and first ratoon were taken, from 60 days after emergence (DAE) and 60 days after harvest (DAH), respectively, until days 210 DAE and 210 DAH. To build the models, partial least squares regression analysis was used and was trained by three transformations of the spectral data: (i) average reflectance spectrum (R), (ii) multiple scatter correction and Savitzky-Golay filter MSC-SG) reflectance spectrum, and (iii) calculated vegetation indices (VIs).Entities:
Keywords: Nitrogen; PLS regression; Reflectance spectra; Sugarcane; Vegetation indices
Year: 2021 PMID: 33855237 PMCID: PMC8027782 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Location of the experiment: Experimental Station of the Agricultural Water and Soils Laboratory, Universidad del Valle.
Figure 2Total monthly mean rainfall and temperature during the two stages of the rapid growth stage of sugarcane variety CC 01–1940 in 2018–2019.
Calculated vegetation indices.
| Vegetation index | Vegetation index |
|---|---|
| (1) CIrededge = (750/710) - 1 | (16) CVI =(820∗668)/(560ˆ2) |
| (2) NDVI750/650= (750 - 650)/(750 + 650) | (17) CVIRE1 = (717∗668)/(560ˆ2) |
| (3) NDVIg = (750 - 550)/(750 + 550) | (18) CVIRE2 = (820∗717)/(560ˆ2) |
| (4) CIgreen = (820/550)-1 | (19) CIRE1 = 717/(668-1) |
| (5) CCCI = ((820 - 717)/(820 + 717))/((820 - 668)/(820 + 668)) | (20) CIRE2 = 820/(717-1) |
| (6) NDVI = (820 -668)/(820 + 668) | (21) CIG = 820/(560-1) |
| (7) NDVIRE = (717-668)/(717 + 668) | (22) CIGRE = 717/(560-1) |
| (8) NDERE = (820-717)/(820 + 717) | (23) NGRDI = (560-668)/(560 + 668) |
| (9) GNDVI = (820-560)/(820 + 560) | (24) ENDVI = ((820 + 560)-(2∗475))/((820 + 560)+(2∗475)) |
| (10) GNDRE = (717-560)/(717 + 560) | (25) ENDRE = ((717 + 560)-(2∗475))/((717 + 560)+(2∗475)) |
| (11) BNDVI=(820-475)/(820 + 475) | (26) NDRE = ((780-730)/(780 + 730)) |
| (12) BNDRE=(717-475)/(717 + 475) | (27) VOGRE = (740)/(720) |
| (13) EVI = 2.5∗(820-668)/(820 + 6∗668–7.5∗475 + 1) | (28) DVI = ((780-668) |
| (14) EVIRE1 = 2.5∗(717-668)/(717 + 6∗668–7.5∗475 + 1) | (29) MNDVI8=((755-730)/(755 + 730)) |
| (15) EVIRE2 = 2.5∗(820-717)/(820 + 6∗717–7.5∗475 + 1) |
(Adapted from: Henrich et al., 2012)
Note: The number in parentheses corresponds to the order assigned in the correlation and regression analysis.
Model performance according to R2 and RPD.
| Statistical methods | Model Performance | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Unacceptable | Acceptable | Good | |
| r2 | <0.50 | 0.50–0.75 | >0.75 |
| RPD | <1.40 | 1.40–2.00 | >2.00 |
RPD = (SD)/RMSE.
Figure 3Temporal dynamics of total canopy N content. (a) Plant cane. (b) First ratoon.
Figure 4Canopy reflectance spectra per treatment. (a) Plant cane. (b) First ratoon.
Figure 5Temporal variability and correlation curve between Nc and reflectance spectra transformations. (a, b, c) Plant cane (d, e, f) First ratoon.
Performance of the PLS models between hyperspectral and Nc data in plant cane.
| R | MSC-SG | IV | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAE | ONC | RMSEcv | Y-r2 | RMSEr (%) | RPD | ONC | RMSEcv | Y-r2 | RMSEr (%) | RPD | ONC | RMSEcv | Y-r2 | RMSEr (%) | RPD |
| 60 | 8 | 0,40 | 0,98 | 3,80 | 6,65 | 7 | 0,39 | 0,99 | 2,67 | 9,50 | 12 | 0,36 | 0,97 | 4,52 | 5,57 |
| 90 | 5 | 0,87 | 0,85 | 7,98 | 2,67 | 4 | 1,19 | 0,63 | 12,56 | 1,69 | 9 | 1,22 | 0,81 | 9,03 | 2,35 |
| 120 | 7 | 2,02 | 0,92 | 4,49 | 3,68 | 7 | 1,89 | 0,94 | 3,86 | 4,29 | 3 | 2,16 | 0,18 | 14,66 | 1,13 |
| 150 | 4 | 3,20 | 0,55 | 11,27 | 1,53 | 4 | 3,40 | 0,55 | 11,22 | 1,53 | 2 | 4,61 | 0,19 | 15,07 | 1,14 |
| 180 | 4 | 2,84 | 0,74 | 6,83 | 2,02 | 4 | 2,92 | 0,73 | 7,03 | 1,96 | 1 | 3,82 | 0,15 | 12,35 | 1,11 |
| 210 | 1 | 7,82 | 0,23 | 36,51 | 1,17 | 1 | 8,77 | 0,06 | 40,42 | 1,06 | 1 | 9,72 | 0,06 | 40,44 | 1,06 |
DAE: days after emergence. ONC: optimal number of components. RMSE: root mean square error. cv: cross-validation. r2: variance explained. RPD: residual prediction deviation.
Performance of the PLS models between hyperspectral and Nc data in first ratoon.
| R | MSC-SG | IV | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAH | ONC | RMSEcv | Y-r2 | RMSEr (%) | RPD | ONC | RMSEcv | Y-r2 | RMSEr (%) | RPD | ONC | RMSEcv | Y-r2 | RMSEr (%) | RPD |
| 60 | 7 | 0,35 | 0,96 | 4,35 | 5,32 | 6 | 0,34 | 0,97 | 3,79 | 6,11 | 1 | 0,38 | 0,23 | 19,80 | 1,17 |
| 90 | 7 | 0,72 | 0,98 | 1,16 | 9,55 | 7 | 0,71 | 0,99 | 0,99 | 11,20 | 2 | 1,12 | 0,35 | 8,66 | 1,28 |
| 120 | 2 | 2,43 | 0,24 | 8,54 | 1,18 | 1 | 2,28 | 0,29 | 8,29 | 1,21 | 2 | 2,47 | 0,08 | 9,43 | 1,07 |
| 150 | 4 | 3,41 | 0,24 | 9,79 | 1,17 | 2 | 3,35 | 0,11 | 10,56 | 1,09 | 6 | 2,89 | 0,72 | 5,94 | 1,93 |
| 180 | 7 | 4,00 | 0,81 | 5,75 | 2,38 | 6 | 3,36 | 0,75 | 6,63 | 2,07 | 12 | 3,53 | 0,94 | 3,38 | 4,06 |
| 210 | 4 | 1,83 | 0,46 | 5,66 | 1,39 | 1 | 2,06 | 0,05 | 7,51 | 1,05 | 9 | 1,94 | 0,80 | 3,42 | 2,32 |
DAH: days after harvest. ONC: optimal number of components. RMSE: root mean square error. cv: cross-validation. r2: variance explained. RPD: residual prediction deviation.
Figure 6Regression coefficients for each wavelength of the best-performing PLS models. Method R for (a) plant cane and (b) first ratoon. Method MSC-SG for (c) plant cane and (d) first ratoon.
Figure 7VIP for each wavelength of the best-performing PLS models. Method R for (a) plant cane and (b) first ratoon. Method MSC-SG for (c) plant cane and (d) first ratoon.