| Literature DB >> 33855236 |
K Fabrice Kapiamba1,2, Merveille Kimpiab3.
Abstract
Iron ore froth flotation has recently been used to obtain pure minerals due to the depletion of high-grade deposits. Amine collectors have often been used in cationic reverse iron ore flotation to achieve the separation with quartz impurities. The main problem associated with these collectors is related to the control of frothing properties and the high cost of amine reagents. In this paper, we report the benefits of partial replacement of amine collectors with a frother in reverse cationic flotation of hematite. Surface tension and batch flotation experimental results indicated for the first time that replacing Flotigam EDA, an etheramine collector by more than 10% improved the flotation performance in both grade and recovery of hematite. It was also noted mild hematite entrainments for lower frother dosages whilst reagents cost estimation indicated profitability per ton of iron recovered. At higher frother dosage however, higher quartz recoveries were observed as a result of entrainment which led to satisfactory results in terms of iron grade in the sink, but results showed higher costs of reagents than when collector was used alone. From observed results, it was concluded that partially replacing amine collector by a frother does improve the performance of the flotation globally regardless of pronounced entrainment that was mainly due the mineralogy of the ore with notable amounts of locked particles in the lower sizes. Finally, it would be useful to investigate these findings with alternative reagents and on minerals with different mineralogical properties.Entities:
Keywords: Collector; Entrainment; Frother; Hematite; Iron ore flotation; Reverse cationic flotation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33855236 PMCID: PMC8027778 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06559
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Chemical analysis showing weight percentages of the feed per size class.
| Size (μm) | SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | MnO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | SO3 | Cr2O3 | NiO | H2O- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -25 | 15,04 | 0,17 | 3,52 | 77,19 | 0,06 | 0,33 | 0,56 | 0,62 | 0,19 | 0,03 | 0,08 | 0,04 | 0,13 |
| +25 to-38 | 14,44 | 0,14 | 1,92 | 80,75 | 0,08 | 0,20 | 0,58 | 0,33 | 0,14 | 0,02 | 0,11 | 0,06 | 0,02 |
| +38 to-53 | 17,01 | 0,13 | 2,08 | 78,48 | 0,07 | 0,17 | 0,57 | 0,36 | 0,14 | 0,02 | 0,10 | 0,05 | 0,06 |
| +53 to-75 | 17,27 | 0,12 | 2,05 | 77,81 | 0,07 | 0,14 | 0,59 | 0,37 | 0,12 | - | 0,07 | 0,04 | 0,04 |
| +75 to -150 | 18,56 | 0,12 | 2,16 | 76,29 | 0,08 | 0,12 | 0,57 | 0,38 | 0,12 | 0,01 | 0,12 | 0,03 | 0,04 |
| +150 to -212 | 18,02 | 0,12 | 2,26 | 77,86 | 0,07 | 0,11 | 0,59 | 0,40 | 0,11 | - | 0,11 | 0,03 | 0,00 |
| +212 | 17,88 | 0,12 | 2,29 | 76,76 | 0,11 | 0,09 | 0,58 | 0,39 | 0,11 | - | 0,08 | 0,04 | 0,07 |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of bench flotation procedure.
Figure 2Surface tension vs collector EDA concentration.
Figure 3Surface tension vs collector concentration.
Figure 4Quartz recovery and grade.1
Figure 5The recovery rate of quartz using several frother dosage replacement.
Figure 6Fe and water recoveries for <25 um particles.
Figure 7Water vs Fe recoveries.
Figure 8Qemscan image of iron ore and mineralogical characterization
Figure 9Cost implications of frother assisted hematite flotation.