Literature DB >> 33855198

Early initiation of sodium-glucose linked transporter inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and associated metabolic and electrolyte outcomes in diabetic kidney transplant recipients.

Chelsey Chenxi Song1, Andrew Brown1, Ryan Winstead1, Idris Yakubu1, Moses Demehin1, Dhiren Kumar1, Gaurav Gupta1.   

Abstract

There is a paucity of data on the use of SGLT2 inhibitors on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. There may be concern in initiating these agents, especially within the first year post-transplant when renal function is more labile and immunosuppression more intense, due to a presumed high risk of urinary infections and acute kidney injury. This is a retrospective study on 50 kidney transplant recipients, half of whom were started on therapy within the first year of transplant. Over a follow-up period of 6 months, overall patients had a statistically significant improvement in weight by -2.95 kg [SD 3.54, P = <.0001 (CI: 3.53, 1.50)] as well as hypomagnesemia 0.13 [SD 1.73, P = .0004 (CI: 0.06, 0.20)]. Overall insulin usage declined by -3.7 units [SD 22.8, P = .17]. 14% of patients had at least one urinary tract infection although this rate is not different (~20%) than that reported historically in this high-risk population.
© 2020 The Authors. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33855198      PMCID: PMC8029504          DOI: 10.1002/edm2.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 2398-9238


Post‐transplant diabetes (PTDM) is commonly associated with increased morbidity and mortality in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients. Electrolyte instability such as hypomagnesemia has been associated with increased risk in the development of new‐onset PTDM, worsening cardiovascular outcomes and insulin resistance post‐KT. , , The use of sodium‐glucose linked transporter inhibitors (SGLT‐2i) in nontransplant diabetic patients has demonstrated reduced cardiovascular mortality, delayed chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and correction of hypomagnesemia. , Currently, there are data on the use of SGLT‐2i in KT recipients within the first year post‐transplant when renal function may be lower and immunosuppression more intense. These factors may increase the vulnerability of KT recipients to SGLT‐2i‐associated adverse events such urinary tract infections (UTIs), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and prerenal acute kidney injury (AKI). However, early initiation of SGLT‐2i within the first year post‐KT may provide significant benefits not only in glycemic control and metabolic side effects, but also in long‐term hypomagnesemia associated with chronic calcineurin inhibitor utilization. Proper management of these complications early on post‐transplant is needed to curb the progression to chronic disease and deleterious graft outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the metabolic, electrolyte and safety outcomes of early SGLT‐2i utilization in KT recipients. This was a single centre, retrospective, institutional review board approved study conducted in adult KT recipients who met our SGLT‐2i initiation criteria. Patients were eligible if they had type II diabetes (pre‐existing type 2 diabetes or PTDM); absence of AKI ≤30 days prior to initiation of therapy; freedom from any UTIs 6 months prior to therapy initiation; and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 mL/min at the time of initiation. Primary outcomes were changes in weight, insulin dosage, haemoglobin A1C (HgbA1C), magnesium concentration and safety outcomes including treated UTIs, DKA, amputations and hospitalizations due to AKI. The choice of SGLT‐2i was chosen based on patient's individual insurance coverage. Selected outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Of the 62 patients evaluated, 50 met inclusion criteria. Thirty‐nine (78%) received deceased donor KT, and thirty‐three (66%) were males. The median time to drug initiation was 319 days (IQR 112, 696) from transplant, twenty (40%) of whom were started within 200 days post‐transplant. The mean eGFR at the time of initiation was 66.7 ± 20.6 mL/min with 7 (14%) patients initiating therapy with an eGFR between 30 and 45 mL/min. There were no changes in renal function 3 and 6 months post‐therapy. Forty‐three (86%) patients received empagliflozin, 6 (12%) canagliflozin and 1 (2%) dapagliflozin. A significant improvement in weight by −2.95 kg [(SD 3.54, P = <.0001 (CI: 3.53, 1.50)] and increase in magnesium concentration by 0.13 [(SD 1.73, P = .0004 (CI: 0.06, 0.20)] were seen within a mean follow‐up of 101 days (Figure 1). Overall insulin requirements also decreased by −3.7 units, however not statistically significant (SD: 22.8 P = .17). None of the patients experienced DKA, amputations or AKI episodes. Seven (14%) developed UTIs on average 69.4 days after drug initiation. Therapy was discontinued in 9 patients: 5 (10%) due to UTIs, 1 (2%) developed a genital yeast infection, 1 (2%) due to native disease recurrence, 1 (2%) due to resolution of PTDM and 1 (2%) due to physician preference.
Table 1

Results

N = 50 P‐value
Mean Age (SD)57.03 (13.14)
Male, n (%)33 (66)
DDKT, n (%)39 (78)
Concomitant diabetic therapy, n(%)
Metformin32 (64)
GLP‐15 (10)
DPP‐412 (24)
Sulfonylurea1 (2)
Insulin42 (84)
Diabetes Type
Pre‐existing Type 2 Diabetes40 (80)
PTDM10 (20)
Immunosuppression Regimen, n(%)
Tacrolimus45 (90)
Mycophenolate mofetil47 (94)
Prednisone49 (98)
Time from Transplant to Drug initiation (Median, IQR)319.5 d (122, 696)
Started within 200 d n (%)20 (40)
Started within 365 d n (%)30 (60)
eGFR at Drug Initiation (Mean, SD)66.7 mL/min
30‐45 mL/min n(%)7 (14)
Change in eGFR (Median, IQR) postinitiation
3 mo (IQR)−1 mL/min (−7.5, 7) P = .8831
6 mo (IQR)1 mL/min (−8,16) P = .1478
Change in HgbA1C (Mean, SD)−0.53% (1.79) P = .1189
Treated UTI (%)7 (14)
Change in Insulin Requirement (Mean, SD)−3.7 units (22.8) P = .17

Abbreviations: DDKT, deceased donor kidney transplant; DPP‐4, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73m2); GLP‐1, glucagon‐like peptide‐1; HgbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; UTI, urinary tract infection.

Excluding patients already on magnesium repletion therapy.

Figure 1

Changes in magnesium and patient weight

Results Abbreviations: DDKT, deceased donor kidney transplant; DPP‐4, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73m2); GLP‐1, glucagon‐like peptide‐1; HgbA1c, haemoglobin A1c; IQR, interquartile range; SD, standard deviation; UTI, urinary tract infection. Excluding patients already on magnesium repletion therapy. Changes in magnesium and patient weight Despite the nonsignificant short‐term impact on diabetic management, our study illustrates that SGLT‐2i can be used safely in the management of PTDM within KT recipients. Thereby increasing the oral antidiabetic treatment arsenal, as diet and oral medications have shown to be superior in obtaining glycemic control as compared to subcutaneous insulin among KT patients. The small but statistically significant increment in magnesium concentrations might also provide benefit in KT recipients who experience chronic hypomagnesemia and decrease the progression of cardiovascular related outcomes. , , , Our incidence of adverse events particularly UTIs was comparable or even lower than those previously reported. , , Some limitations to our study include the single‐centre retrospective study design where results cannot be truly interpreted for causality and data collection was at the mercy of clinic visit documentations. Future randomized research is needed to further validate the results. Overall, the addition of SGLT‐2i in select KT patients could provide benefit to common metabolic complications and electrolyte abnormalities such as weight gain and chronic hypomagnesaemia from prolonged immunosuppression exposure.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Dr Gaurav Gupta has served on the Scientific Advisory Board of Relypsa. The rest of the authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

Chelsey Chenxi Song, PharmD, participated in research design, participated in the writing of the paper, and participated in the performance of the research. Andrew Brown, PharmD, Idris Yakubu, PharmD, and Moses Demehin, PharmD, participated in data collection. Ryan Winstead, PharmD, participated in data collection and participated in data analysis. Dhiren Kumar, MD, participated in research design. Gaurav Gupta, MD, participated in research design and participated in writing and editing of the paper.
  10 in total

1.  Effects of oral magnesium supplementation on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled trials.

Authors:  Y Song; K He; E B Levitan; J E Manson; S Liu
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.359

2.  Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and the Risk for Severe Urinary Tract Infections: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chintan V Dave; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Dae Kim; Michael Fralick; Angela Tong; Elisabetta Patorno
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Glucose control is associated with patient survival in diabetic patients after renal transplantation.

Authors:  Franz Wiesbauer; Georg Heinze; Heinz Regele; Walter H Hörl; Gerit H Schernthaner; Christoph Schwarz; Alexander Kainz; Reinhard Kramar; Rainer Oberbauer
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  The effect of magnesium supplements on early post-transplantation glucose metabolism: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven Van Laecke; Evi Vanessa Nagler; Youri Taes; Wim Van Biesen; Patrick Peeters; Raymond Vanholder
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.782

5.  The relation between hypomagnesaemia and vascular stiffness in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Steven Van Laecke; Céline Maréchal; Francis Verbeke; Patrick Peeters; Wim Van Biesen; Olivier Devuyst; Michel Jadoul; Raymond Vanholder
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Efficacy and Safety of Empagliflozin in Renal Transplant Recipients With Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Thea Anine Strøm Halden; Kine Eide Kvitne; Karsten Midtvedt; Laavanyaah Rajakumar; Ida Robertsen; Jan Brox; Jens Bollerslev; Anders Hartmann; Anders Åsberg; Trond Jenssen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Elevated serum magnesium associated with SGLT2 inhibitor use in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Huilin Tang; Xi Zhang; Jingjing Zhang; Yufeng Li; Liana C Del Gobbo; Suodi Zhai; Yiqing Song
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Christoph Wanner; Silvio E Inzucchi; John M Lachin; David Fitchett; Maximilian von Eynatten; Michaela Mattheus; Odd Erik Johansen; Hans J Woerle; Uli C Broedl; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Empagliflozin in posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: A prospective, interventional pilot study on glucose metabolism, fluid volume, and patient safety.

Authors:  Elisabeth Schwaiger; Lukas Burghart; Lorenzo Signorini; Robin Ristl; Chantal Kopecky; Andrea Tura; Giovanni Pacini; Thomas Wrba; Marlies Antlanger; Sabine Schmaldienst; Johannes Werzowa; Marcus D Säemann; Manfred Hecking
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  SGLT2 Inhibitors for Treatment of Refractory Hypomagnesemia: A Case Report of 3 Patients.

Authors:  Evan C Ray; Cary R Boyd-Shiwarski; Pengfei Liu; Danica Novacic; David Cassiman
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2020-04-18
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  New Therapeutic Horizons in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Role of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Marc Evans; Angharad R Morgan; Martin B Whyte; Wasim Hanif; Stephen C Bain; Philip A Kalra; Sarah Davies; Umesh Dashora; Zaheer Yousef; Dipesh C Patel; W David Strain
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Diabetes in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Maria P Martinez Cantarin
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.620

3.  Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Kidney Transplantation: What Are We Waiting For?

Authors:  Niralee Patel; Judy Hindi; Samira S Farouk
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-04-22

4.  Comparative Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on Serum Electrolyte Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jingjing Zhang; Yonghong Huan; Mark Leibensperger; Bojung Seo; Yiqing Song
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2022-01-19

5.  Safety and Efficacy of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Kidney Transplant Recipients With Pretransplant Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective, Single-center, Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis of 85 Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Yu Hisadome; Takanori Mei; Hiroshi Noguchi; Toshiaki Ohkuma; Yu Sato; Keizo Kaku; Yasuhiro Okabe; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 6.  Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in kidney transplant recipients: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Aditi Ujjawal; Brittany Schreiber; Ashish Verma
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.435

7.  Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Management of Refractory Hypomagnesemia Without Overt Urinary Magnesium Wasting: A Report of 2 Cases.

Authors:  Chintan V Shah; T Scott Robbins; Matthew A Sparks
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2022-08-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.