Literature DB >> 33855165

Control of S phase duration: a replication capacity model with E2F transcription at its heart.

Cosetta Bertoli1, Robertus A M de Bruin1,2.   

Abstract

DNA replication capacity, the maximal amount of DNA a cell can synthesize at any given time during S phase, is controlled by E2F-dependent transcription. Controlling replication capacity limits the replication rate and provides a robust mechanism to keep replication fork speed within an optimal range whilst ensuring timely completion of genome duplication.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA replication; DNA replication capacity; E2F-dependent transcription; S phase; genome stability

Year:  2021        PMID: 33855165      PMCID: PMC8018357          DOI: 10.1080/23723556.2020.1839294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol        ISSN: 2372-3556


Introduction

Accurate genome duplication is essential for life. During the cell cycle, a number of regulatory mechanisms ensure that the genome is duplicated completely, accurately, and only once per cell cycle during the synthesis phase (S phase) before it is segregated during mitosis to produce two genetically identical daughter cells. Upon S phase entry DNA replication is initiated, known as firing, from discrete location in the genome, termed replication origins. Replication proteins bind to origins in a highly regulated manner, which is known as licensing. Firing allows for replication to be initiated from replication origins forming so-called replication bubbles, where two replication forks emanating from an origin proceed in opposite directions. The number of origins that are licensed is much higher than the actual number of origins that fire, leaving the majority of origins in an inactive, dormant state.[1] This allows for plasticity during the DNA replication process; if a replication fork stalls, another dormant origin nearby becomes active and replication can be completed. In addition, not all active origin fire at the beginning of S phase but follow a spatial and temporal firing program with early, mid, and late firing origins. This program is linked to the three-dimensional organization of the genome that is in turn linked to the structure and function of chromatin. This ensures that only a limited number of the active replication origins fire at a certain time during S phase.[1]

Replication capacity determines the length of S phase

The total amount of DNA being synthesized at a given time during S phase is determined by the number of active replication forks and the speed at which these travel. This is the DNA synthesis rate, which determines the time it takes to duplicate the entire genome and thereby S phase duration. Empiric observations suggest that a reduction in the firing of origins is compensated for by an increase in replication fork speed and vice versa.[2-4] This inverse relationship between the amount of firing and the speed of replication forks supports the idea that there is a limited amount of DNA a cell can synthesis per unit time. In our recently published work,[5] where we explore this concept, we propose a replication capacity model, whereby cells have an intrinsic mechanism to limit the amount of DNA they can synthetize at any given time throughout S phase. We argue that a mechanism that limits the amount of DNA synthesis ensures timely completion of genome duplication independently of fluctuations in the number of active replication forks. This would ensure that replication fork speed is maintained within a safe range, preventing replication forks from traveling too slowly or too quickly (Figure 1a), which has been linked to the generation of genomic instability.[6]
Figure 1.

Molecular mechanism through which replication capacity regulates DNA replication rate and S phase length via E2F transcription

Molecular mechanism through which replication capacity regulates DNA replication rate and S phase length via E2F transcription

E2F transcription determines replication capacity

Our work suggests that E2F-dependent transcription lies at the basis of the mechanism that controls replication capacity during S phase. Activation of E2F-dependent transcription drives the transition between Gap1 (G1) phase and S phase and is central to cell cycle entry. It is regulated by a family of transcription factors (E2F transcription factors 1–8) and their co-regulators, the pocket proteins, whose most prominent member is the protein Retinoblastoma 1, RB1. E2F-dependent genes encode for proteins required for cell cycle progression and DNA replication and repair.[7] Activation of E2F-dependent transcription in G1 is followed by its inactivation during S phase, giving rise to a wave of G1/S transcription, with target gene expression peaking at different times during the G1 and S phases.[8] Our work shows that preventing inactivation of E2F-dependent transcription during S phase, via depletion of the repressor E2F6, increases the amount of DNA cells can synthesis per unit time during S phase, thus shortening the S phase length. Conversely, overexpressing E2F6, by reducing E2F-dependent transcription, decreases DNA synthesis rates (Figure 1b, C). We propose that E2F-dependent transcription controls replication capacity by controlling the gene expression levels of replication factors required for DNA replication. Our findings extend the central role of E2F-dependent transcription in controlling S phase. Our work establishes that in addition to driving S phase entry it also determines the S phase duration, which is in addition to its critical role in the cellular response to replication stress for maintenance of genome stability.[9] Together these findings support a general role for E2F transcription in the S phase control and homeostasis, showing an overarching role for this transcriptional network in the mechanisms controlling genome duplication both in unperturbed conditions and under stress.

Importance for genomic stability and cancer

The concept that replication fork speed must be maintained within an optimal range is already well supported by the finding that significantly slowing down or speeding up replication forks increases fork stalling, and potentially collapse, with implications for genome stability.[6] A mechanism that provides a framework within which replication dynamics can fluctuate, by indirectly controlling replication fork progression to stay within an optimal range, is an important homeostatic mechanism for S phase. Our data show that increasing the speed of replication forks, by increasing replication capacity, causes cell cycle arrest and generates a certain level of DNA damage in subsequent cell cycles. It is not clear what causes the DNA damage, but it is possible that some under-replicated DNA or other unresolved structures are detected during mitosis and subsequently recognized by the checkpoint in the following G1. E2F-dependent transcription is often deregulated in cancer, as a consequence of oncogene activation, causing unscheduled S phase entry.[10] Our data suggest that besides shortening the G1 phase, deregulated E2F-dependent transcription is also likely to affect the replication capacity of cancer cells. Further research is required to establish if this provides a buffer to prevent oncogene-induced replication stress or contributes to the accumulation of genomic instability.
  8 in total

1.  Dynamics of DNA replication in mammalian somatic cells: nucleotide pool modulates origin choice and interorigin spacing.

Authors:  Mauro Anglana; Françoise Apiou; Aaron Bensimon; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Eukaryotic chromosome DNA replication: where, when, and how?

Authors:  Hisao Masai; Seiji Matsumoto; Zhiying You; Naoko Yoshizawa-Sugata; Masako Oda
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 3.  The E2F transcriptional network: old acquaintances with new faces.

Authors:  Desssislava K Dimova; Nicholas J Dyson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Replication fork velocities at adjacent replication origins are coordinately modified during DNA replication in human cells.

Authors:  Chiara Conti; Barbara Saccà; John Herrick; Claude Lalou; Yves Pommier; Aaron Bensimon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Stem cells: Multiple routes to pluripotency.

Authors:  Kim Baumann
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  Regulation of replication fork speed: Mechanisms and impact on genomic stability.

Authors:  Joanna Maria Merchut-Maya; Jiri Bartek; Apolinar Maya-Mendoza
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-08

7.  Sustained E2F-Dependent Transcription Is a Key Mechanism to Prevent Replication-Stress-Induced DNA Damage.

Authors:  Cosetta Bertoli; Anna E Herlihy; Betheney R Pennycook; Janos Kriston-Vizi; Robertus A M de Bruin
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 8.  The broken cycle: E2F dysfunction in cancer.

Authors:  Lindsey N Kent; Gustavo Leone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 60.716

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.