Literature DB >> 33854956

Giant splenic cyst with expectant management in pregnancy: A case report and review of the literature.

Chiara Germano1, Lorenza Attamante1, Michela Chiadò Fiorio Tin1, Paolo Petruzzelli1, Bianca Masturzo1, Guido Menato1.   

Abstract

A 22-year-old primigravida was diagnosed with an 18-cm splenic cyst during routine third-trimester routine ultrasound examination. She was referred to a tertiary obstetric hospital and after multidisciplinary consultation, expectant management was decided on. Induction of labour was performed at term and she delivered vaginally with vacuum extractor application without complications. Percutaneous aspiration and sclerotherapy of the cyst was performed one week after delivery. She was hemodynamically stable throughout.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case report; Expectant management; Pregnancy; Splenic cyst

Year:  2021        PMID: 33854956      PMCID: PMC8024879          DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2021.e00305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health        ISSN: 2214-9112


Introduction

Splenic cysts are rare clinical findings, often diagnosed incidentally upon imaging conducted for other complaints. The diagnosis of a large splenic cyst during pregnancy is rare and management is not standardized. A small number of cases have been reported in literature and different managements have been proposed. However, there is no strong evidence to support the superiority of any single treatment. This case report documents the expectant management of a giant splenic cyst diagnosed in the third trimester. The patient had a vaginal delivery followed by postpartum sclerotherapy for the cyst.

Case Presentation

A 22-year-old primigravida, with no relevant clinical history except mild thrombocytopenia (96.000 platelets/ml) diagnosed during pregnancy, underwent a routine third-trimester ultrasound scan at 32 weeks. Foetal growth and anatomy were normal, with posterior placental location. During the examination, a large cyst (18 × 13 × 12 centimetres) was noted in the left hypochondrium between the spleen and the left pole of the liver (Fig. 1). The woman had no history of trauma and was asymptomatic. She was referred to a tertiary obstetric hospital for further assessment and an ultrasound examination there confirmed the presence of the giant cyst but its nature was still unclear. The following day, the patient was admitted as an emergency complaining of left hypochondrial pain. On admission, her vital signs were as follows: blood pressure 123/78 mmHg, heart rate 89 beats per minute and O2 saturation 100%. Serial measurements of vital signs were performed to exclude hemodynamic compromise due to the risk of cyst rupture and clinical stability was documented during hospitalization. Abdominal ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed. MRI (Fig. 2) showed the mass to be an intra-parenchymal splenic cyst with high T1 signal intensity, suggestive of a possible previous haemorrhagic event. Four differential diagnoses were considered: epidermoid cyst, parasitic cyst, cystic lymphangioma and vascular lesion. The patient was temporarily hospitalized in the general surgery department for investigation, then returned to the obstetrics department for foetal and maternal monitoring. Both remained clinically stable. An infectious origin of the cyst was excluded by serological test results, including a test for antibodies against Echinococcus.
Fig. 1

Ultrasound scan at 32 weeks of gestational age shows the cyst, 17,5 × 12,3 cm, located in the left hypochondrium.

Fig. 2

MRI at 32 weeks of gestational age confirmed the diagnosis of splenic cyst.

Ultrasound scan at 32 weeks of gestational age shows the cyst, 17,5 × 12,3 cm, located in the left hypochondrium. MRI at 32 weeks of gestational age confirmed the diagnosis of splenic cyst. A multidisciplinary team composed of obstetricians, general surgeons and anaesthetists discussed clinical management. Expectant management was decided on, with induction of labour at 37 weeks in an operating theatre so as to be ready for emergency laparotomy in case of cyst rupture. At 37 weeks and 4 days of gestation, a cervical ripening balloon was placed. It was removed after 12 h and, since the obstetric finding was still unfavourable (Bishop score < 6), according to the hospital protocols, vaginal dinoprostone was administered. Induction of labour was continued in the operating theatre with amniotomy and oxytocin infusion, with the constant presence of a team of anaesthetists, obstetricians and midwives. A general surgeon joined the team at the beginning of the second stage of labour. In order to limit the increase in intra-abdominal pressure during expulsive efforts, after determining the station and position of the foetal head with transabdominal sonography [1], a vacuum extractor was applied when the largest diameter of the foetal head reached the ischial spines. A healthy baby of 2990 g was delivered vaginally. Maternal condition remained stable and no clinical signs of cystic rupture were detected. The volume reduction of the uterus immediately after delivery allowed the palpation of the cyst to the umbilical transverse line. Five days after delivery, an upper abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan with contrast medium showed the lesion was unchanged. Fine-needle aspiration of a sample of the cystic liquid produced amorphous material and the culture test was negative. Due to clinical stability and the result of the cytological examination, a minimally invasive approach was decided on. Percutaneous aspiration and sclerotherapy of the cyst was performed under US/CT guidance: 1900 ml of blood-stained fluid was drained and 300 ml of alcohol was infused and aspirated using a French size 6 catheter. Twenty-four hours later, sclerotherapy was repeated. Before each procedure, contrast examination was performed to exclude abdominal leakage; at the end, tigecycline 80 mg was infused into the empty cyst cavity and the drainage was removed. The patient was discharged and her clinical condition remained stable over the following months.

Literature Review

Splenic cysts affect approximately 0.07% of the general population [2]. In the literature, of 800 cases, only 13 were described in pregnancy [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]] (Table 1). Usually, they are clinically asymptomatic, except for 30% of patients who experience pain in left hypochondrium, nausea and weight loss, hypertension due to renal artery compression, thrombocytopenia and anaemia [9].
Table 1

Management of splenic cyst during pregnancy: review of the literature.

AuthorTypeDimension (CM)GA (weeks)ManagementOutcomes
Elit, 1989Epidermoid CaOncological Surgery
Bar-Hozar, 1998Epidermoid cyst34Splenectomy LPT at term
Mendez-Arzac, 2002Hydatid cystSplenectomy II trimester
Ceglowska, 2003Infective cystTTP and splenectomy
Can, 2003Hydatid cyst25Exeresis at 25w
Rotas, 2007Epidermoid cyst179Percutaneous drainage at 14w and 16w, sepsis, Antibiotic therapy, Fenestration LPS and omentopexy at 17wSpontaneous delivery at 38w without complications
Montasser, 20102024Percutaneous drainage, infection, Antibiotic therapy, anaemia and trasfusionSpontaneous delivery at 40w. Percutaneous aspiration 6w after delivery, spontaneous resolution after 1 year
Hamm,2012Epidermoid cyst1427Expectant management till 33w, intracystic haemorrhage without rupture, Emergency C-Section and splenectomyNo complications
Hamm, 2012Epidermoid cyst920Percutaneous aspiration and drainage at 34w, recurrence and drainage at 38wC-section at 40w for dystocia. Alcohlization 2 days post-partum. Recurrence a 2 months post-partum.
Farouzesh, 2013Epidermoid cyst2015Splenectomy at 17wNo complications
Varban, 2013Multilocular epidermoid cyst1118Vaccination (Meningo, Pneumo and Haemophilus) and LPS SplenectomySpontaneous delivery at term
Lederrey, 20161310Expectant managementSpontaneous delivery at term. Splenectomy 6 months after delivery.
Kapp, 2016Epithelial cyst158LPS exeresis of cystNo complications

Legend: LPT: laparotomy, LPS: laparoscopy, TTP: therapeutic termination of pregnancy.

Management of splenic cyst during pregnancy: review of the literature. Legend: LPT: laparotomy, LPS: laparoscopy, TTP: therapeutic termination of pregnancy. Splenic cysts can be classified as parasitic and non-parasitic, according to the cause, or as primary and secondary, according to the presence or absence of an epithelial lining [10]. Primary cysts are classified as parasitic, congenital and neoplastic types. The parasitic type is most commonly caused by Echinococcus granulosus larvae and rupture of the cyst may result in anaphylactic shock. Congenital cysts occur mainly in children and young adults and can be epidermoid, dermoid or endodermoid, depending on the tissue of origin. [9] Neoplastic cysts are divided in dermoid type and endodermoid type (hemangiomas and lymphangiomas). Secondary cysts are the most common; they are pseudocysts without epithelial wall, and 75% are post-traumatic while 25% are caused by mononucleosis, tuberculosis or malaria [10,11]. First-level imaging consists of ultrasound, which can show the lesion as solid or fluid-filled, unilocular or multilocular, with or without calcifications or vascularization. Second-level imaging is by MRI, which has greater sensitivity and specificity than ultrasound, to provide the exact location of the cyst and help to plan the operative approach. When cancer is suspected, cytological examination through fine-needle aspiration is generally contraindicated because of the high risk of leakage of malignant cells during procedure. The main complication of splenic cysts is rupture. In pregnancy, this happens in 4.5% of cases, mostly in the third trimester, with a high perinatal mortality rate (about 70%) [12]. Rupture of the cyst can lead to hemoperitoneum, peritonitis, sepsis and anaphylactic shock (in the case of parasitic cysts) [10,11]. Regarding treatment, the literature shows that the main criteria are dimensions of the cyst, gestational age, patient condition and level of available hospital care [4]. For small asymptomatic cysts (<5 cm), the literature supports a conservative approach with monthly ultrasound [10] because of frequent spontaneous resolution of the cyst. Larger symptomatic cysts (more than 5 cm) should be managed surgically, in the second trimester, as they are more likely to result in complications in the third trimester. Two main strategies are described in the literature: percutaneous drainage and surgery. Percutaneous drainage under ultrasound guidance can replace or precede surgery; it is effective in 80% of cases and can also be combined with sclerotherapy with alcohol [13,14]. However, some authors do not recommend this approach because of the risk of infection and recurrence [10]. Laparoscopic surgery can be performed during the second trimester. Surgical approaches include fenestration with omentopexy, which has minimal risk of bleeding [10], and marsupialization [6]. Partial splenectomy for a cyst located at the poles of the spleen preserves the immune function of the organ [5,8], while total splenectomy represents the gold standard for posterior or hilum cysts, for big or suspicious formations and in the case of rupture [[4], [5], [6]]. At present, the literature is sparse and there are no official guidelines on the management of this rare condition [7] and whether vaginal delivery should be preferred if there are no obstetric indications. Table 1 shows details of 13 cases reported in the literature, with characteristics of the cysts, gestational age at diagnosis, treatments and outcomes.

Case Discussion

In this case, we elected for expectant management since the diagnosis was made in the third trimester, a time during which surgical intervention would have been more harmful. As an alternative, we could have performed percutaneous drainage; however, the patient was stable and the risk of spontaneous rupture is slight. There was concern that percutaneous drainage could have been complicated by sepsis, major bleeding, recurrence and preterm labour; thus, after discussion and agreement with the patient, we opted for expectant management and induction of labour. The hospital was equipped with 8 delivery rooms and 3 operating theatres, which meant that labour could be readily managed in an operating theatre and that extra staff were available if necessary. The decision to perform vacuum extraction was taken when the largest diameter of the foetal head reached the plane of the ischial spines (leading point of the skull at +1/+2) to reduce expulsive efforts.

Conclusions

This is the second case described in the literature on the expectant management of a large splenic cyst with vaginal delivery at term performed without complications. Since the risk of spontaneous rupture is low, we believe that a pregnant woman diagnosed with a splenic cyst should be given the chance of vaginal delivery. The patient should be referred to a tertiary hospital as it can provide a safe setting for labour with a multidisciplinary team ready to perform emergency caesarean section and splenectomy in the event of cystic rupture.
  13 in total

1.  Epidermoid cyst of the spleen.

Authors:  R A Cowles; A M Yahanda
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Pregnancy complicated with a giant splenic cyst: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael Rotas; Richard Ossowski; Gordon Lutchman; Michael Levgur
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Splenic Epidermoid Cyst during Pregnancy; Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Majid Forouzesh; Laleh Ghanbarzadegan; Masoomeh Rahimi; Leila Ghahramani
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2013-10

4.  When the spleen meets the fetus.

Authors:  Jérôme Lederrey; Markus Schäfer; Maud de Rham; David Baud
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-02-23

5.  Posttraumatic splenic cysts and partial splenectomy: report of a case.

Authors:  S M Balzan; C E Riedner; L M Santos; M C Pazzinatto; P R Fontes
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Randomised Italian Sonography for occiput POSition Trial Ante vacuum (R.I.S.POS.T.A.).

Authors:  T Ghi; A Dall'Asta; B Masturzo; B Tassis; M Martinelli; N Volpe; F Prefumo; G Rizzo; G Pilu; L Cariello; L Sabbioni; A M Morselli-Labate; T Todros; T Frusca
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 7.  Image-guided percutaneous splenic interventions.

Authors:  Ajay K Singh; Sridhar Shankar; Debra A Gervais; Peter F Hahn; Peter R Mueller
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Management of a large splenic cyst in pregnancy--a case report.

Authors:  Wojciech Dabrowski; Katarzyna Luterek; Andrzej Szczepanik; Beata Niedźwiedzka; Mirosław Wielgós
Journal:  Ginekol Pol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Splenic cyst during pregnancy.

Authors:  Oliver Varban
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-13

10.  Splenic cysts: Analysis of 16 cases.

Authors:  Hamed Golmohammadzadeh; Ghodratollah Maddah; Yavar Shams Hojjati; Abbas Abdollahi; Hossein Shabahang
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.