| Literature DB >> 33854932 |
Zahra Mardanshahi1, Maryam Tayebi2, Sajad Shafiee3, Maryam Barzin4, Misagh Shafizad3, Reza Alizadeh-Navaei5, Abdolmajid Gholinataj6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) especially at the subacute stage is still a challenging issue using the conventional imaging modalities. Here we evaluated the role of double inversion recovery (DIR) sequence of MRI compared with the conventional gradient-recalled echo (GRE)-T2*-W and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) sequences in the diagnosis of subacute SAH.Entities:
Keywords: Double inversion recovery; MRI; Magnetic resonance imaging; Subarachnoid hemorrhage
Year: 2020 PMID: 33854932 PMCID: PMC7735974 DOI: 10.37796/2211-8039.1058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicine (Taipei) ISSN: 2211-8020
Number of haemorrhagic areas (SI abnormality) detected in the various regions of subarachnoid space by different MR sequences after readers’ consensus.
| Fronta-parietal | Temporal- occipital | Interhemispheric fissure | Sylvian cistern | Perimesencephalic cistern | Posterior fossa cistern | Total | Fronta-parietal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T2*-W only | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| SWI only | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| DIR only | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 17 |
| T2*-W and SWI | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| T2*-W and DIR | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| SWI and DIR | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| T2*-W, SWI and DIR | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Total | 16 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 58 |
Inter-observer agreement for all applied MR sequences between 2 neuroradiologists based on various anatomical areas.
| T2* -W (95% CI) | SWI (95% CI) | DIR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frontal-parietal | 1.000 (1-1) | 0.447 (0.030 –0.731) | 0.882 (0.733-0.951) |
| Temporal- Occipital | 0.679 (0.360 –0.856) | 0.551 (0.168 -0.790) | 0.716 (0.420-0.874) |
| Interhemispheric fissure | 0.716 (0.421 –0.874) | 1.000 (1-1) | 1.000 (1-1) |
| Sylvian cistern | 0.542 (0.155 –0.785) | 0.798 (0.566-0.913) | 0.816 (0.599-0.921) |
| Perimesencephalic cistern | 0.783 (0.538 –0.906) | 0.783 (0.538 –0.906) | 1.000 (1-1) |
| Posterior fossa cistern | 0.447 (0.030 –0.732) | 1.000 (1-1) | 0.882 (0.733-0.951) |
Fig. 1Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage in a 44-year-old woman. MR images were performed 18 days after injury. Using T2*-W (A, arrows) and SWI (B, arrows) images, detection of SAH is a challenging issue due to its adjacency to main veins in the base of the skull and the similarity of signal intensity between these veins and haemorrhage may lead to misdiagnosis of SAH in this region of brain. In DIR image (C, arrows), SAH is demonstrated as marked several hyper-intense regions in the left Sylvian cistern. Note that detecting SAH in this area is one the priorities of DIR sequence to T2* and SWI.
Fig. 2SAH in temporooccipital subarachnoid space in a 32-year-old man who done MRI 17 days after traumatic injury. In axial T2* (A) and SWI (B) images, no signal abnormality is detected because of the destructive susceptibility artifact from air-tissue interfaces in the temporal lobes. Conversely, distinguished signal intensity in DIR (C, arrow) image is observed.
Fig. 3Fronto-parietal SAH in a 21-year-old man with traumatic brain injury. Haemorrhagic regions in T2*-W (A, arrow) is less visible than SWI (B, arrow), whereas DIR (C, arrow) showed SAH as a significant hyper-intense location in the right parietal sulcus.
Number of patients with at least 1 SAH area found for different MR sequences after an agreement between readers.
| T2*-W | SWI | DIR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frontal-parietal | 8 | 6 | 12 |
| Temporal- Occipital | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| Interhemispheric fissure | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Sylvian cistern | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Perimesencephalic cistern | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Posterior fossa cistern | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Total number of patients | 15 | 17 | 20 |