Literature DB >> 33854736

A comprehensive digital approach to enhance smiles using an intraoral optical scanner and advanced 3-D sculpting software.

Paul Zhivago1, Ilser Turkyilmaz1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D printing; Digital impression; Esthetics; Smile design; Veneer

Year:  2020        PMID: 33854736      PMCID: PMC8025131          DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Sci        ISSN: 1991-7902            Impact factor:   2.080


× No keyword cloud information.
Intraoral optical scanners (IOS) eliminate the necessity for traditional impressions by enabling the acquisition of digital impressions. Recent studies have demonstrated that high trueness and precision can be attained by digital impressions., Until recently, the only output generated by IOS for digital impressions was the STL (Standard Tessellation Language) file format. Now, some IOS provide alternative file formats such as OBJ (OBJect) and PLY (PoLYgon). OBJ and PLY file formats enable a more accurate model than the traditional STL file format. These newer formats encode 3-D (3-Dimensional) models via tessellation with polygonal facets, and additionally capture information about color and surface texture, allowing for extremely accurate, multicolor 3-D printing. Smile design can be performed digitally and allows a patient to have heightened awareness of the anticipated treatment outcomes, prior to initiation of a treatment plan., Some digital smile design software programs are time-consuming and difficult to incorporate into a clinical workflow. However, the software program (Zbrush, Pixologic, Los Angeles, CA, USA) used in this report is one of the most advanced digital sculpting and painting programs, providing an intuitive workflow. This software allows several actions (i.e., pushing, pulling) by using millions of polygons simultaneously, and it is traditionally used by professional artists and computer graphics designers in the film and videogame industries. This clinical report describes a comprehensive technique using an intraoral optical scanner, advanced 3-D digital sculpting software program, and a 3-D printer to rehabilitate an unpleasant smile. The chief complaint of our 55-year-old patient was “I don't like my front teeth” and she requested a more esthetic smile. After various treatment options were discussed with the patient, she elected to proceed with the fabrication of porcelain veneers on the ten maxillary teeth. Our digital workflow began with extraoral digital photographs (frontal facial view with full lip retraction, exaggerated smile, and teeth in maximum intercuspal position). An intraoral optical scanner (Medit i500, Medit Corp., Seoul, South Korea) was utilized to acquire the digital impressions of both arches (Fig. 1A). Then the extraoral digital photographs and digital impressions, in OBJ file format, were superimposed with the 3-dimensional sculpting software program, and the designs of the proposed restorations were completed (Fig. 1B).
Figure 1

Digital scan of the teeth before (A), and after the digital design of proposed restorations (B). Digital file of both arches before 3-D printing (C). The maxillary resin cast with new smile design was fabricated with a 3-D printer (D). Intra-oral views of the patient before (E) and after (F) the treatment.

Digital scan of the teeth before (A), and after the digital design of proposed restorations (B). Digital file of both arches before 3-D printing (C). The maxillary resin cast with new smile design was fabricated with a 3-D printer (D). Intra-oral views of the patient before (E) and after (F) the treatment. Mandibular and maxillary resin cast with the new smile design were fabricated using a 3-D printer (Sprintray Pro 3D Printer, Sprintray, Los Angeles, CA, USA) (Fig. 1C and D). A silicone matrix was created from an impression of the maxillary resin cast, and the temporary crowns were fabricated (Luxatemp, DMG America, Ridgefield Park, NJ, USA). The temporary crowns were inserted intraorally, and esthetics, phonetics, and occlusion were confirmed. Tooth preparations were completed by using temporary crowns as a guide. After gingival retraction was performed, the final impression was made using vinyl polysiloxane impression material (Aquasil, Dentsply, York, PA, USA) and the definitive cast was poured. The veneer restorations were fabricated in lithium disilicate glass-ceramic in the laboratory (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Amherst, NY, USA). Each tooth surface and veneer was prepared (i.e., etching, bonding) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and then all veneers were permanently cemented (Variolink Esthetic, Ivoclar Vivadent, Amherst, NY, USA) (Fig. 1E and F). An occlusal guard for the patient was manufactured from the 3-D digital scan. The patient did not have any problems during the one year follow-up. The outcomes of this report indicate that the advanced treatment modality presented here may be a viable option to predictably restore unpleasant smiles.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review.

Authors:  Pekka Ahlholm; Kirsi Sipilä; Pekka Vallittu; Minna Jakonen; Ulla Kotiranta
Journal:  J Prosthodont       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Direct 3D printing of silicone facial prostheses: A preliminary experience in digital workflow.

Authors:  Alexey Unkovskiy; Sebastian Spintzyk; Joern Brom; Fabian Huettig; Constanze Keutel
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Fully digital workflow, integrating dental scan, smile design and CAD-CAM: case report.

Authors:  Miguel Stanley; Ana Gomes Paz; Inês Miguel; Christian Coachman
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method.

Authors:  Zsolt Nagy; Botond Simon; Anthony Mennito; Zachary Evans; Walter Renne; János Vág
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Transforming smiles using an intraoral scanner and face scan application on smartphone.

Authors:  Hilal Ciftci Asutay; Ilser Turkyilmaz; Merve Benli; Jacqueline L Martinez
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.719

2.  Analysis of the relationship between the surface topography of prepared tooth surfaces and data quality of digital impressions from an intraoral scanner.

Authors:  Neset Volkan Asar; Sarah Yun; Shelby Schwartz; Ilser Turkyilmaz
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 2.080

3.  Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 5-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated with CAD/CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.

Authors:  Irem Gokce Uluc; Mustafa Baris Guncu; Guliz Aktas; Ilser Turkyilmaz
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.080

4.  Swirl marks on the internal surface of restorations during mill simulation: A pathway to catastrophic failures.

Authors:  Ilser Turkyilmaz; Gregory Neil Wilkins
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.080

5.  Relationship between the data quality of digital scans from intraoral scanners and surface topography of prepared teeth.

Authors:  Ilser Turkyilmaz; Gregory Neil Wilkins; Merve Benli
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 2.080

6.  Correlation between the data quality of digital impressions and surface topography of prepared teeth.

Authors:  Ilser Turkyilmaz; Sarah Yun; Gregory Neil Wilkins; Merve Benli
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.080

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.