| Literature DB >> 33854716 |
Qiu-Chi Ran1,2, Sheng-Rong Long3, Yan Ye4, Chen Xie1, Zhuo-Lin XuXiao1, Yu-Song Liu1, Hong-Xia Pang5, Diwas Sunchuri1, Nai-Chia Teng6,7, Zhu-Ling Guo1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/Entities:
Keywords: HNSCC; Immune scores; TCGA; Tumor microenvironment
Year: 2020 PMID: 33854716 PMCID: PMC8025193 DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.09.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Sci ISSN: 1991-7902 Impact factor: 2.080
Figure 1Immune scores and stromal scores are associated with HNSCC grades and their overall survival. A) Distribution of immune scores of HNSCC grades. Boxplot shows that there is significant association between HNSCC grades and the level of immune scores (p < 0.05). B) Distribution of stromal scores of HNSCC grades. Box-plot shows that there is not significant association between HNSCC grades and the level of stromal scores (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Immune scores and stromal scores are associated with HNSCC overall survival. A) HNSCC cases were divided into two groups based on their immune scores: the top half of cases with higher immune scores and the bottom half of cases with lower immune scores. As shown in the Kaplan–Meier survival curve, median survival of the low score group is shorter than high score group, as indicated by the log-rank test, p value is 0.107. B) HNSCC cases were divided into two groups based on their stromal scores: the top half of 209 cases and the bottom half of 208 cases. The median survival of the low score group is shorter than the high score group, however, it is not statistically different as indicated by the log-rank test p value is 0.814.
Figure 3Comparison of gene expression profile with immune scores and stromal scores in HNSCC. Heatmaps were drawn based on the average linkage method and Pearson distance measurement method. Genes with higher expression are shown in red, lower expression are shown in blue, genes with same expression level are in white. A) Heatmap of the DEGs of immune scores of top half (high score) vs. bottom half (low score). p < 0.05, fold change >1.5). B) Heatmap of the DEGs of stromal scores of top half (high score) vs. bottom half (low score). p < 0.05, fold change >1.5). Venn diagrams showing the number of commonly upregulated C) or downregulated D) DEGs in stromal and immune score groups.
Figure 4A: Top 10 BP, CC, MF terms and B: top 25 KEGG pathways enrichment analysis was performed by R package clusterprofiler (p. adjusted <0.05).
Figure 5DEGs extracted from TCGA database with overall survival. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated for selected DEGs extracted from the comparison of groups of high (red line) and low (blue line) gene expression. p < 0.001 in Log-rank test.