| Literature DB >> 33854698 |
Krisztina N Dugmonits1, Payal Chakraborty1, Réka Hollandi2, Szabolcs Zahorán1, Gabriella Pankotai-Bodó3, Péter Horváth2, Hajnalka Orvos4, Edit Hermesz1.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2019/1509798.].Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33854698 PMCID: PMC8019374 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9762481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Visualization of the confocal images with varying morphology in relation to the phosphorylation of NOS3 in RBC-NS and RBC-S populations. The representative confocal Z-stack images show RBC-NS (a–c) and RBC-S (d–f) with regular biconcave and RBC-S echinocyte (g–i) with the echinocyte phenotypes. (a, d, g) show the RBCs immunolabelled with a mouse primary anti-NOS3 antibody followed by an Alexa Fluor® 647 secondary antibody. (b, e, h) represent the RBCs immunolabelled with a rabbit anti-p-NOS3 (p-NOS3) primary antibody, followed by an Alexa Fluor® 488 secondary antibody. The microscopic parameter, i.e., the thickness of z-axis, was 3.845 μm/slice, and the scale bar of 5 μm was kept constant at all instances. The RBCs were randomly selected from both RBCNS (n = 40‐45 regular biconcave-shaped cells from each of 3 independent samples) and RBC-S (n = 30‐35 regular biconcave cells from each of 5 independent samples and n = 10 echinocytes from each of 4 independent samples) groups. In the highlighted zone of interest, zooming ratios were 4.486, 6.865, and 10.019 in (a–c), (d–f), and (g–i), respectively. The ImageJ 1.51n software was used to quantify the mean intensity levels from three middle slices in the RBC-NS, RBC-S, and RBC-S echinocyte for NOS3 (j) and p-NOS3 (k). (l) The ratio between NOS3 and p-NOS3 intensity levels. All statistical analyses were accepted by one-way ANOVA using the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test at ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. MFI: mean fluorescence intensity.