Literature DB >> 3385456

Geographically-based cancer control: methods for targeting and evaluating the impact of screening interventions on defined populations.

J F Kerner1, H Andrews, A Zauber, E Struening.   

Abstract

Successful implementation of cancer control programs depends on efficient targeting to those at highest risk of developing and dying from the disease. This study presents a methodology for targeting cancer screening on the basis of population and disease variation among small geographic areas. Techniques for quantifying the impact of targeting on the predictive value of a positive test are demonstrated, using 329 New York City health areas. Age-truncated crude incidence, late-stage incidence and mortality rates for breast, cervix, and colorectal cancer are used, using site-specific truncation points relevant to the age groups appropriate for screening. Coefficient alpha was used to determine rate stability with 2, 3, 5 and 7 years of data. The stability of most small area rates was found to reach acceptable levels only with 5 and 7 years of data. Targeting into areas where breast cancer prevalence was high increased the expected predictive value of a positive test by as much as 50% when compared with areas of average prevalence. Geographic targeting will be most useful where between-area variability in prevalence is large and within-area variability is small. The implications of these results are discussed and future studies are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3385456     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90058-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  8 in total

1.  Using census and mortality data to target small areas for breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  H F Andrews; J F Kerner; A G Zauber; J Mandelblatt; J Pittman; E Struening
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Geographic analysis of pertussis infection in an urban area: a tool for health services planning.

Authors:  C Siegel; A Davidson; K Kafadar; J M Norris; J Todd; J Steiner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Geographic disparities in late-stage cancer diagnosis: multilevel factors and spatial interactions.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey May Kuo; Lisa Watson; G Gordon Brown
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.078

4.  Variations in asthma hospitalizations and deaths in New York City.

Authors:  W Carr; L Zeitel; K Weiss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Low-income neighborhoods and the risk of severe pediatric injury: a small-area analysis in northern Manhattan.

Authors:  M S Durkin; L L Davidson; L Kuhn; P O'Connor; B Barlow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Cervical cancer rates by population size of towns: implications for cancer control programs.

Authors:  A P Polednak; J T Flannery; D T Janerich
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1991-12

7.  The crossroads of GIS and health information: a workshop on developing a research agenda to improve cancer control.

Authors:  Linda Williams Pickle; Martha Szczur; Denise Riedel Lewis; David G Stinchcomb
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.918

8.  Geospatial analysis of multiple cancers in individuals in the US, 2004-2014.

Authors:  Lia C Scott; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Dora Il'yasova; Lee R Mobley
Journal:  Ann Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2021-03-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.