| Literature DB >> 33854438 |
Camila Manrique-Acevedo1,2,3, Jaume Padilla2,4, Huma Naz1,3, Makenzie L Woodford2,4, Thaysa Ghiarone2, Annayya R Aroor1,2, Jack L Hulse1, Francisco J Cabral-Amador2, Vanesa Martinez-Diaz1, Chetan P Hans2,5, Adam Whaley-Connell1,3,6, Luis A Martinez-Lemus2,7,8, Guido Lastra1,3.
Abstract
Enhanced mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) signaling is critical to the development of endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffening. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the role of MR-induced adipose tissue inflammation in the genesis of vascular dysfunction in women. In this study, we hypothesize that MR activation in myeloid cells contributes to angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced aortic stiffening and endothelial dysfunction in females via increased pro-inflammatory (M1) macrophage polarization. Female mice lacking MR in myeloid cells (MyMRKO) were infused with Ang II (500 ng/kg/min) for 4 weeks. This was followed by determinations of aortic stiffness and vasomotor responses, as well as measurements of markers of inflammation and macrophage infiltration/polarization in different adipose tissue compartments. MyMRKO mice were protected against Ang II-induced aortic endothelial stiffening, as assessed via atomic force microscopy in aortic explants, and vasorelaxation dysfunction, as measured by aortic wire myography. In alignment, MyMRKO mice were protected against Ang II-induced macrophage infiltration and M1 polarization in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and thoracic perivascular adipose tissue (tPVAT). Collectively, this study demonstrates a critical role of MR activation in myeloid cells in the pathogenesis of vascular dysfunction in females associated with pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization in VAT and tPVAT. Our data have potential clinical implications for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in women, who are disproportionally at higher risk for poor outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: adipose tissue; arterial stiffening; endothelium; inflammation; macrophage
Year: 2021 PMID: 33854438 PMCID: PMC8039313 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.588358
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
Sequences of primers used in this investigation.
| Gene studied | Primer sequence |
| CD11b | Forward: 5′-CCA AGA CGA TCT CAG CAT-3′ |
| CD206 | Forward: 5′-CAA GGA AGG TTG GCA TTT GT-3′ |
| GAPDH | Forward: 5′-GGA GAA ACC TGC CAA GTA TGA-3′ |
| CD11c | Forward: 5′-ACA CAG TGT GCT CCA GTA TGA-3 ′ |
| CD68 | Forward: 5′-CCC AAT TCA GGG TGG AAG AA-3′ |
| TNF-a | Forward: 5′-GCC TCT TCT CAT TCC TGC TTG-3′ |
| IL-6b | Forward: 5′-GAT AAG CTG GAG TCA CAG AAG G-3′ |
| IL-10 | Forward: 5′-CCA AGC CTT ATC GGA AAT GA-3′ |
| MCP-1 | Forward: 5′-GTC TCA ACC AGA TGC AGT TAA T-3′ |
| N0 × 2 | Forward: 5′-CTT TGG TAC AGC CAG TGA AGA-3′ |
| N0 × 4 | Forward: 5′ CTG GAC CTT TGT GCC TTT ATT G-3′ |
Body weight and insulin and plasma aldosterone levels in female MyMRKO and LM mice after treatment with Ang II (500 ng/kg/min) or saline via osmotic minipumps for 4 weeks.
| LM-Saline | LM-Ang II | MyMRKO-Ang II | |
| Body weight (grams) | 21.4 ± 0.6 | 20.8 ± 1.4 | 20.4 ± 1.9 |
| Insulin (ng/dL) | 0.51 ± 0.05 | 0.32 ± 0.22 | 0.58 ± 0.10 |
| Aldosterone (pmol/L) | 2317.94 ± 316.57 | 6407.60 ± 594.15* | 6332.08 ± 447.07$ |
FIGURE 1Ang II-induced aortic stiffening is ameliorated by myeloid cell MR deletion. Systolic blood pressure (A) and ex vivo assessment of aortic endothelial stiffness by atomic force microscopy (B). *p ≤ 0.05 LM-Ang II vs. LM-Saline; #p ≤ 0.05 LM-Ang II vs. MyMRKO-Ang II; $p ≤ 0.05 MyMRKO-Ang II vs. LM-Saline. n = 6–9 for all groups. EC, endothelial cell; LM, littermate; Ang II, angiotensin II; MyMRKO, myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor knockout.
FIGURE 2Deletion of myeloid cell MR improves endothelial function in Ang II-infused mice. Aortic vasomotor responses to acetylcholine (ACh) [(A) response curve, (B) area under the curve (AUC)], insulin (C,D), and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (E,F). *p ≤ 0.05 LM-Ang II vs. LM-Saline; #p ≤ 0.05 LM-Ang II vs. MyMRKO-Ang II; $p ≤ 0.05 MyMRKO-Ang II vs. LM-Saline. n = 4–15 for all groups. LM, littermate; Ang II, angiotensin II; MyMRKO, myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor knockout.
FIGURE 3Deletion of myeloid cell MR decreases Ang II-induced iNOS expression in myeloid and endothelial cells. (A) Representative images of iNOS staining in myeloid and endothelial cells at 4×, 40×, and 100×of the different cohorts. (B) iNOS-positive endothelial cells and (C) iNOS-positive myeloid cells. Results are expressed as percent positive cells. *p ≤ 0.05 LM-Ang II vs. LM-Saline; $p ≤ 0.05 MyMRKO-Ang II vs. LM-Saline; #p ≤ 0.05 LM-Ang II vs. MyMRKO-Ang II. n = 4–7 for all groups. iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; LM, littermate; Ang II, angiotensin II; MyMRKO, myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor knockout.
FIGURE 4Macrophage infiltration in visceral adipose tissue is decreased in MyMRKO mice. Representative image of Mac-2 staining in visceral adipose tissue (VAT) of the different cohorts (A); Mac-2 staining quantification (B). *p ≤ 0.05 LM-Ang II vs. LM-Saline; #p ≤ 0.05 LM-Ang II vs. MyMRKO-Ang II. n = 9–10 for all groups. LM, littermate; Ang II, angiotensin II; MyMRKO, myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor knockout.
FIGURE 5Markers of macrophage infiltration and polarization in different fat depots. (A) Thoracic perivascular adipose tissue (tPVAT), (B) abdominal perivascular adipose tissue (aPVAT), and (C) visceral adipose tissue (VAT). Total macrophage expression (CD11b), M1 macrophage expression (MCP-1), and M2 macrophage polarization (IL-10). #p ≤ 0.05, LM-Ang II vs. MyMRKO-Ang II. n = 9–10 for all groups. LM, littermate; Ang II, angiotensin II; MyMRKO, myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor knockout.
FIGURE 6Myeloid MR deletion reduces M1 macrophage polarization in mice infused with Ang II. Flow cytometer analysis of macrophages isolated from visceral adipose tissue. (A) M1-macrophage polarization and (B) M2-macrophage polarization; #p ≤ 0.05 LM-Ang II vs. MyMRKO-Ang II. n = 3–6. LM, littermate; Ang II, angiotensin II; MyMRKO, myeloid mineralocorticoid receptor knockout.