Literature DB >> 33854205

A review on the history of and treatment options for foreskin reconstruction after circumcision.

Floyd Wilhelmus Timmermans1,2,3, Sterre Elisabeth Mokken1,2,4, Sahaand Cris Zoë Poor Toulabi1, Mark-Bram Bouman1,2,4, Müjde Özer5,6,7.   

Abstract

Circumcision is arguably one of the most performed procedures in the world and transcends cultures, nationalities, and religions. New insights into the motivations of men seeking circumcision reversal was the incentive to further investigate known reconstructive therapies. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to present an overview of the historical context and treatment options known for foreskin reconstruction. This review was written after a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, SCHOLAR databases, and additional Google searches. The practice of foreskin manipulation and the undoing of penile circumcision has a long and turbulent history going back to antiquity. Nowadays, the available data on treatment options remains sparse, focusing primarily on surgical techniques and is generally poorly documented. Nonsurgical methods of reconstruction are rarely mentioned in literature. Nonetheless, nonsurgical methods, such as manual stretching and device-assisted tissue expansion, are commonplace among those who pursue foreskin reconstruction. Although the nonsurgical methods have yielded good results with minimal adverse effects, no proper medical research has been performed to quantify these outcomes. Future studies should also be performed to assess the impact that foreskin reconstruction has on quality of life in this population.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33854205     DOI: 10.1038/s41443-021-00438-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.408


  3 in total

1.  UNCIRCUMCISION.

Authors:  L TUSHNET
Journal:  Med Times       Date:  1965-06

2.  [A simple method of plastic surgery of the prepuce after radical (ritual) circumcision].

Authors:  H FERIZ
Journal:  Munch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1962-08-03

3.  Assessment of the protective effect of male circumcisioin from HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases: evidence from 18 demographic and health surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Samson Gebremedhin
Journal:  East Afr J Public Health       Date:  2010-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.