| Literature DB >> 33854205 |
Floyd Wilhelmus Timmermans1,2,3, Sterre Elisabeth Mokken1,2,4, Sahaand Cris Zoë Poor Toulabi1, Mark-Bram Bouman1,2,4, Müjde Özer5,6,7.
Abstract
Circumcision is arguably one of the most performed procedures in the world and transcends cultures, nationalities, and religions. New insights into the motivations of men seeking circumcision reversal was the incentive to further investigate known reconstructive therapies. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to present an overview of the historical context and treatment options known for foreskin reconstruction. This review was written after a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, SCHOLAR databases, and additional Google searches. The practice of foreskin manipulation and the undoing of penile circumcision has a long and turbulent history going back to antiquity. Nowadays, the available data on treatment options remains sparse, focusing primarily on surgical techniques and is generally poorly documented. Nonsurgical methods of reconstruction are rarely mentioned in literature. Nonetheless, nonsurgical methods, such as manual stretching and device-assisted tissue expansion, are commonplace among those who pursue foreskin reconstruction. Although the nonsurgical methods have yielded good results with minimal adverse effects, no proper medical research has been performed to quantify these outcomes. Future studies should also be performed to assess the impact that foreskin reconstruction has on quality of life in this population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33854205 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-021-00438-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Impot Res ISSN: 0955-9930 Impact factor: 2.408