Literature DB >> 33853878

Continued versus discontinued oxytocin stimulation in the active phase of labour (CONDISOX): double blind randomised controlled trial.

Sidsel Boie1, Julie Glavind2, Niels Uldbjerg2, Philip J Steer3, Pinar Bor1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether discontinuing oxytocin stimulation in the active phase of induced labour is associated with lower caesarean section rates.
DESIGN: International multicentre, double blind, randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Nine hospitals in Denmark and one in the Netherlands between 8 April 2016 and 30 June 2020. PARTICIPANTS: 1200 women stimulated with intravenous oxytocin infusion during the latent phase of induced labour. INTERVENTION: Women were randomly assigned to have their oxytocin stimulation discontinued or continued in the active phase of labour. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Delivery by caesarean section.
RESULTS: A total of 607 women were assigned to discontinuation and 593 to continuation of the oxytocin infusion. The rates of caesarean section were 16.6% (n=101) in the discontinued group and 14.2% (n=84) in the continued group (relative risk 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.53). In 94 parous women with no previous caesarean section, the caesarean section rate was 7.5% (11/147) in the discontinued group and 0.6% (1/155)in the continued group (relative risk 11.6, 1.15 to 88.7). Discontinuation was associated with longer duration of labour (median from randomisation to delivery 282 v 201 min; P<0.001), a reduced risk of hyperstimulation (20/546 (3.7%) v 70/541 (12.9%); P<0.001), and a reduced risk of fetal heart rate abnormalities (153/548 (27.9%) v 219/537 (40.8%); P<0.001) but rates of other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In a setting where monitoring of the fetal condition and the uterine contractions can be guaranteed, routine discontinuation of oxytocin stimulation may lead to a small increase in caesarean section rate but a significantly reduced risk of uterine hyperstimulation and abnormal fetal heart rate patterns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02553226. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33853878     DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  2 in total

1.  Continued versus discontinued oxytocin after the active phase of labor: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Danni Jiang; Yang Yang; Xinxin Zhang; Xiaocui Nie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Use and Effects of Augmentation of Labor with Oxytocin: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Case-Control Study of 4350 Women in Warsaw, Poland, 2015-2020.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączek; Sylwia Rychlewicz; Margareta Budner; Ilona Kowalska; Robert Gałązkowski; Justyna Teliga-Czajkowska
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-08-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.