Literature DB >> 33853863

How machine learning is embedded to support clinician decision making: an analysis of FDA-approved medical devices.

David Lyell1, Enrico Coiera2, Jessica Chen2, Parina Shah2, Farah Magrabi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine how and to what extent medical devices using machine learning (ML) support clinician decision making.
METHODS: We searched for medical devices that were (1) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) up till February 2020; (2) intended for use by clinicians; (3) in clinical tasks or decisions and (4) used ML. Descriptive information about the clinical task, device task, device input and output, and ML method were extracted. The stage of human information processing automated by ML-based devices and level of autonomy were assessed.
RESULTS: Of 137 candidates, 59 FDA approvals for 49 unique devices were included. Most approvals (n=51) were since 2018. Devices commonly assisted with diagnostic (n=35) and triage (n=10) tasks. Twenty-three devices were assistive, providing decision support but left clinicians to make important decisions including diagnosis. Twelve automated the provision of information (autonomous information), such as quantification of heart ejection fraction, while 14 automatically provided task decisions like triaging the reading of scans according to suspected findings of stroke (autonomous decisions). Stages of human information processing most automated by devices were information analysis, (n=14) providing information as an input into clinician decision making, and decision selection (n=29), where devices provide a decision.
CONCLUSION: Leveraging the benefits of ML algorithms to support clinicians while mitigating risks, requires a solid relationship between clinician and ML-based devices. Such relationships must be carefully designed, considering how algorithms are embedded in devices, the tasks supported, information provided and clinicians' interactions with them. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medical informatics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33853863     DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform        ISSN: 2632-1009


  5 in total

1.  Incessant threat of COVID-19 variants: Highlighting need for a mix of FDA-approved artificial intelligence tools and community pharmacy services.

Authors:  Muhammad Faisal Nadeem; Nazish Matti; Shagufta Parveen; Sehrish Rafiq
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2021-07-21

2.  An interactive dashboard to track themes, development maturity, and global equity in clinical artificial intelligence research.

Authors:  Joe Zhang; Stephen Whebell; Jack Gallifant; Sanjay Budhdeo; Heather Mattie; Piyawat Lertvittayakumjorn; Maria Del Pilar Arias Lopez; Beatrice J Tiangco; Judy W Gichoya; Hutan Ashrafian; Leo A Celi; James T Teo
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2022-04

3.  AI-Enabled Algorithm for Automatic Classification of Sleep Disorders Based on Single-Lead Electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Erdenebayar Urtnasan; Eun Yeon Joo; Kyu Hee Lee
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-05

Review 4.  Moving towards vertically integrated artificial intelligence development.

Authors:  Joe Zhang; Sanjay Budhdeo; Wasswa William; Paul Cerrato; Haris Shuaib; Harpreet Sood; Hutan Ashrafian; John Halamka; James T Teo
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-09-15

5.  Algorithm Change Protocols in the Regulation of Adaptive Machine Learning-Based Medical Devices.

Authors:  Stephen Gilbert; Matthew Fenech; Martin Hirsch; Shubhanan Upadhyay; Andrea Biasiucci; Johannes Starlinger
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.