| Literature DB >> 33853655 |
Hermann Watson Sagbohan1,2, Casimir D Kpanou3,4, Razaki Osse3,5, Fortuné Dagnon6, Germain G Padonou3,4, André Aimé Sominahouin3, Albert Sourou Salako3,4, Aboubakar Sidick3, Wilfried Sewade3, Bruno Akinro3, Saadani Ahmed7, Daniel Impoinvil8, Clément Agbangla4,9, Martin Akogbeto3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Insecticide resistance is threatening the effectiveness of efforts to control malaria vectors in Benin. This study explores the levels and mechanisms of insecticide resistance in An. gambiae s.l. to pyrethroids.Entities:
Keywords: An. gambiae s.l.; Insecticide resistance; Intensity; Oxidase; PBO
Year: 2021 PMID: 33853655 PMCID: PMC8048290 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-021-04699-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Study sites
Fig. 2Mortality of An. gambiae s.l. after exposure to increasing doses of deltamethrin, using the WHO tube test (error bars represent the standard errors; the broken red line is the threshold for suspected resistance, the solid line indicates the threshold for confirmed resistance)
Fig. 3Mortality of An. gambiae s.l. after exposure to increasing doses of permethrin, using the WHO tube test (error bars represent the standard errors; the broken red line is the threshold for suspected resistance, the solid line indicates the threshold for confirmed resistance)
Fig. 4The mortality rate for An. gambiae s.l. after exposure to increasing doses of deltamethrin combined with the synergist PBO, using the WHO tube test (error bars represent the standard errors; the broken red line is the threshold for suspected resistance, the solid line indicates the threshold for confirmed resistance)
Fig. 5The mortality rate for An. gambiae s.l. after exposure to increasing doses of permethrin associated with the synergist PBO, using the WHO tube test (error bars represent the standard errors of the mortality rate at the y-axis; below the broken red line suggests suspected resistance, below the solid line signifies confirmed resistance)
Mortality rate difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1× deltamethrin with and without pre-exposure to PBO
| Site | Insecticide | Dead | Alive | Total | Mortality | Rate | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjohoun | PBO + 1× Deltamethrin | 59 | 05 | 64 | 92 | 48 | 36–60 |
| 1× Deltamethrin | 40 | 51 | 91 | 44 | |||
| Allada | PBO + 1× Deltamethrin | 88 | 01 | 89 | 99 | 55 | 45–65 |
| 1× Deltamethrin | 42 | 54 | 96 | 44 | |||
| Bohicon | PBO + 1× Deltamethrin | 88 | 07 | 95 | 93 | 81 | 73–89 |
| 1× Deltamethrin | 11 | 83 | 94 | 12 | |||
| Cotonou | PBO + 1× Deltamethrin | 58 | 32 | 90 | 64 | 48 | 35–61 |
| 1× Deltamethrin | 14 | 71 | 85 | 16 | |||
| Porto-Novo | PBO + 1× Deltamethrin | 77 | 11 | 88 | 88 | 73 | 63–81 |
| 1× Deltamethrin | 14 | 80 | 94 | 15 | |||
| All sites | PBO + 1× Deltamethrin | 370 | 56 | 426 | 87 | 61 | 56–66 |
| 1× Deltamethrin | 121 | 339 | 460 | 26 |
*Differences in mortality rates between 1× deltamethrin and PBO + 1× deltamethrin were significant (p < 0.001) at all sites using the χ2 test
Mortality rate difference and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1× permethrin with and without pre-exposure to PBO
| Site | Insecticide | Dead | Alive | Total | Mortality rate (%) | Rate | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjohoun | PBO + 1× Permethrin | 56 | 10 | 66 | 85 | 41 | 26–56 |
| Permethrin | 27 | 35 | 62 | 44 | |||
| Allada | PBO + 1× Permethrin | 47 | 42 | 89 | 53 | 35 | 22–48 |
| Permethrin | 17 | 79 | 96 | 18 | |||
| Bohicon | PBO + 1× Permethrin | 69 | 27 | 96 | 72 | 50 | 38–62 |
| Permethrin | 22 | 80 | 102 | 22 | |||
| Cotonou | PBO + 1× Permethrin | 72 | 24 | 96 | 75 | 31 | 18–44 |
| Permethrin | 42 | 54 | 96 | 44 | |||
| Porto-Novo | PBO + 1× Permethrin | 51 | 50 | 101 | 50 | 36 | 24–49 |
| Permethrin | 12 | 73 | 85 | 14 | |||
| All sites | PBO + 1× Permethrin | 295 | 153 | 448 | 66 | 39 | 26–52 |
| Permethrin | 120 | 321 | 441 | 27 |
*Differences in mortality rates between 1× permethrin and PBO + 1× permethrin were significant (p < 0.001) at all sites using the χ2 test
Allelic frequencies of Kdr and Ace-1 in Anopheles gambiae s.l. of Cotonou, Porto-Novo, Bohicon, Allada, and Adjohoun
| Locality | Species | No. tested | Mutation | Mutation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR | RS | SS | Freq† | RR | RS | SS | Freq† | |||||
| Cotonou | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.750a | 0.738 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.000a | 1 | |
| 98 | 86 | 9 | 3 | 0.920a | 0 | 6 | 92 | 0.030a | ||||
| Porto-Novo | 79 | 54 | 21 | 4 | 0.820a | 0.566 | 0 | 1 | 78 | 0.006a | 1 | |
| 21 | 13 | 6 | 2 | 0.760a | 0 | 0 | 21 | 0.000a | ||||
| Bohicon | 44 | 33 | 8 | 3 | 0.840a | 0.862 | 0 | 1 | 43 | 0.001a | 0.791 | |
| 56 | 41 | 10 | 5 | 0.820a | 0 | 3 | 53 | 0.002a | ||||
| Adjohoun | 96 | 76 | 16 | 4 | 0.870a | 0.609 | 0 | 2 | 94 | 0.010a | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1.000a | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0.000a | ||||
| Allada | 100 | 66 | 20 | 14 | 0.760a | 1 | 0 | 2 | 98 | 0.010a | 1 | |
| All sites | 321 | 230 | 66 | 25 | 0.820 | NA | 0 | 6 | 315 | 0.010 | NA | |
| 179 | 144 | 25 | 10 | 0.870 | 0 | 9 | 170 | 0.030 | ||||
No. number, An Anopheles, Freq frequency, NA not applicable
*p-value: based on χ2 test to compare the frequencies of both species by study site
†For the same species, the study site with frequencies bearing the same letter do not differ significantly (p > 0.05)
Fig. 6Box-and-whisker plot of the detoxification enzymes [nonspecific esterases (α- and β-esterases), mixed-function oxidases (MFO), and glutathione S-transferase (GST)] in the laboratory colony strain, An. gambiae s.s. (Kisumu) and wild An. gambiae s.l. populations from Adjohoun, Allada, Bohicon, Cotonou, and Porto-Novo. (The boxes represent the 25th and 75th percentiles of individual mosquito measurements; the horizontal black line within the box indicates the median, and the x indicates the mean)
Result of statistical analysis of mean (± SE) mixed-function oxidase, glutathione S-transferase, and esterase activity in An. gambiae s.l. populations
| Strain | α-Esterase | β-Esterase | MFO | GST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (µmol α-Naph/min/mg protein) | (µmol β-Naph/min/mg protein) | (nmol/P450/min/mg protein) | (nmol/GSH conj/min/mg protein) | |
| Kisumu | 0.101 ± 0.010a | 0.091 ± 0.009a | 0.052 ± 0.008a | 0.222 ± 0.027a |
| Cotonou | 0.113 ± 0.021a | 0.151 ± 0.024b | 0.052 ± 0.011a | 0.398 ± 0.062b |
| Porto-Novo | 0.132 ± 0.010b | 0.122 ± 0.009a | 0.050 ± 0.006a | 0.209 ± 0.034a |
| Bohicon | 0.148 ± 0.020b | 0.164 ± 0.023b | 0.053 ± 0.009a | 0.365 ± 0.051b |
| Allada | 0.089 ± 0.011a | 0.106 ± 0.015a | 0.048 ± 0.004a | 0.418 ± 0.052b |
| Adjohoun | 0.058 ± 0.009c | 0.072 ± 0.016a | 0.039 ± 0.008a | 0.261 ± 0.044a |
| One-way ANOVA | ||||
MFO mixed-function oxidases, GST glutathione S-transferase, GSH glutathione. Means followed by different letters are significantly different, p < 0.05, Tukey’s test
*Significant increase in mean differences compared to the laboratory reference strain, p < 0.05, t test. In the same column, the values indexed to the same letter are not significantly different