| Literature DB >> 33853536 |
Yang Fan Li1, Jing Zheng1, He Wei Peng1, Xiao Lin Cai1, Xin Ting Pan1, Hui Quan Li1, Qi Zhu Hong1, Zhi Jian Hu1, Yun Li Wu2, Xian-E Peng3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing and emerging as a global health burden. In addition to environmental factors, numerous studies have shown that genetic factors play an important role in the development of NAFLD. Copy number variation (CNV) as a genetic variation plays an important role in the evaluation of disease susceptibility and genetic differences. The aim of the present study was to assess the contribution of CNV to the evaluation of NAFLD in a Chinese population.Entities:
Keywords: Case control study; Copy number variation; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Year: 2021 PMID: 33853536 PMCID: PMC8045212 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01750-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Clinical characteristics of NAFLD patients and normal controls
| Characteristics | NAFLD (n = 12) | Controls (n = 12) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (F/M) | 9/3 | 9/3 | 1 |
| Age (years) | 41.33 ± 11.36 | 41.00 ± 11.33 | 0.84 |
| WHR | 0.92 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.04 | < 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.83 ± 2.78 | 21.44 ± 1.70 | < 0.001 |
| ALT | 45 ± 48.20 | 12.25 ± 4.50 | 0.001 |
| AST | 28.5 ± 18.48 | 19.5 ± 2.84 | 0.31 |
| TC | 5.81 ± 0.70 | 4.67 ± 0.28 | < 0.001 |
| TG | 2.07 ± 1.18 | 0.82 ± 0.24 | < 0.001 |
| FBG | 5.57 ± 0.67 | 4.98 ± 0.33 | 0.009 |
| LDL-C | 3.73 ± 0.63 | 2.97 ± 0.18 | 0.001 |
| HDL-C | 1.29 ± 0.18 | 1.33 ± 0.21 | 0.435 |
BMI body mass index, WHR waist-to-hip ratio, AST serum aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, GGT gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase, FBG serum fasting glucose, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein
Fig. 1Distribution of genomic CNV in different samples
CNV detected on autosomes of 12 pairs of samples
| Sample number | Gains (CNV-containing genes) | Losses (CNV-containing genes) | Range of CNV (kb–Mb) | Total length of CNV (Mb) | Percentage of genome length (%) | Number of genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pair 1 | 40 (26) | 3 (3) | 15.60–2.35 | 9.91 | 0.17 | 68 |
| Pair 2 | 6 (4) | 38 (32) | 7.46–1.93 | 4.72 | 0.11 | 62 |
| Pair 3 | 5 (4) | 87 (52) | 7.46–0.46 | 8.79 | 0.19 | 88 |
| Pair 4 | 9 (8) | 6 (5) | 5.70–1.17 | 2.68 | 0.05 | 40 |
| Pair 5 | 1 (1) | 39 (31) | 8.53–2.23 | 7.57 | 3.16 | 50 |
| Pair 6 | 4 (4) | 4 (2) | 27.55–2.08 | 3.50 | 0.57 | 22 |
| Pair 7 | 2 (2) | 4 (4) | 20.67–0.46 | 1.03 | 0.60 | 11 |
| Pair 8 | 12 (1) | 5 (3) | 10.03–2.35 | 5.73 | 0.10 | 65 |
| Pair 9 | 6 (6) | 46 (34) | 7.46–2.03 | 7.23 | 0.12 | 86 |
| Pair 10 | 8 (7) | 7 (6) | 9.34–2.13 | 5.49 | 0.09 | 52 |
| Pair 11 | 13 (11) | 16 (14) | 17.57–0.85 | 5.38 | 0.09 | 88 |
| Pair 12 | 11 (10) | 9 (6) | 13.20–2.27 | 7.24 | 0.12 | 82 |
Fig. 2Distribution of CNVRs in the genome
Fig. 3Genomic CNV trends in different samples
Distribution of CNVRs in the genome
| Chr | No. of CNVRs (containing genes) | Range of CNV (kb–Mb) | Average CNV (kb) | Total length of CNV (Mb) | Percentage of chromosome length (%) | No. Of genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 (31) | 7.14–0.85 | 104.26 | 3.75 | 1.5 | 122 |
| 2 | 26 (26) | 7.46–0.51 | 105.01 | 2.73 | 1.13 | 44 |
| 3 | 28 (24) | 10.07–0.39 | 89 | 2.49 | 1.26 | 50 |
| 4 | 25 (25) | 9.03–0.58 | 115.42 | 2.77 | 1.46 | 60 |
| 5 | 10 (10) | 17.83–1.52 | 214.13 | 1.93 | 1.06 | 51 |
| 6 | 19 (19) | 8.95–0.44 | 59.37 | 1.07 | 0.63 | 34 |
| 7 | 22 (19) | 8.14–0.69 | 190.79 | 4.20 | 2.64 | 104 |
| 8 | 12 (12) | 15.07–2.23 | 325.54 | 3.58 | 2.47 | 94 |
| 9 | 15 (11) | 7.63–0.20 | 52.77 | 0.79 | 0.57 | 14 |
| 10 | 13 (11) | 13.84–0.73 | 158.32 | 2.06 | 1.54 | 41 |
| 11 | 22 (22) | 5.70–0.28 | 62.75 | 1.32 | 0.98 | 55 |
| 12 | 12 (12) | 8.68–0.2 | 46.89 | 0.56 | 0.42 | 29 |
| 13 | 12 (8) | 17.94–0.35 | 100.64 | 1.21 | 1.06 | 14 |
| 14 | 19 (15) | 9.97–0.47 | 97.33 | 1.85 | 1.73 | 95 |
| 15 | 15 (15) | 15.60–1.49 | 181.84 | 2.73 | 2.68 | 113 |
| 16 | 17 (14) | 25.82–0.8 | 176.96 | 3.01 | 3.33 | 139 |
| 17 | 11 (11) | 18.61–0.41 | 96.05 | 1.06 | 1.27 | 64 |
| 18 | 5 (5) | 49.08–0.31 | 125.72 | 0.63 | 0.78 | 13 |
| 19 | 8 (8) | 16.49–0.42 | 107.02 | 0.86 | 1.47 | 56 |
| 20 | 5 (4) | 12–24.69 | 18.14 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 8 |
| 21 | 3 (2) | 0.98–0.11 | 41.48 | 0.12 | 0.26 | 4 |
| 22 | 3 (3) | 26.37–0.29 | 119.47 | 0.36 | 0.71 | 21 |
| X | 48 (40) | 17.85–31.52 | 3143.22 | 150.87 | 96.69 | 2357 |
| y | 71 (62) | 12.82–3.96 | 357.95 | 25.41 | 44.40 | 506 |
CNV region associated with NAFLD
| Region | Gene | Sample frequency (gains, losses) | Function | GO item | Relevant study ( DOI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chr3:57199594-57590187 | APPL1 | 1 (0, 1) | Adiponectin, insulin signalling | GO:0008286 | 10.1371/journal.pone.0071391 |
| Chr7:54813380-55274871 | EGFR | 1 (0, 1) | Tyrosine phosphorylation regulates cell proliferation | GO:0000165 | 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4136.2017.05.016; 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.10.016 |
| Chr17:38688567-38738474 | CCR7 | 2 (0, 2) | Participates inflammatory response | GO:0007249 | 10.1038/ijo.2017.200; 10.3870/j.issn.1672-0741.2017.06.011 |
| Chr19:56370486-56416408 | NLRP4 | 3 (0, 3) | Inhibition of type I interferon and NF-KB inflammatory signalling | GO:0032479 | 10.1186/s12876-014-0208-8; 10.1074/jbc.M200446200 |
| Chr22:24347959-24390254 | GSTT1 | 7 (6, 1) | Participates in the phase II reaction and promote toxic metabolism | GO:0004602 | 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.01.015 |
| Chr14:74001651-74022324 | ACOT1 | 2 (1, 1) | Regulation of lipid metabolism enzyme activity | GO:0071616 | 10.2337/db16-1519; 10.1194/jlr.M081455 |
| Chr12:57897795-57918452 | CHOP | 1 (1, 0) | Participates in endoplasmic reticulum stress and promote apoptosis | GO:0036488 | 10.1038/labinvest.2016.61; 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.02.005 |
| Chr1:65935075-65959904 | LEPR | 1 (0, 1) | Regulates leptin signalling | GO:0038021 | 10.2174/1566524018666180705110412; 10.3870/lcxh.j.issn.1005-541X.2011.03.07 |
| Chr20:33470663-33495348 | ACSS2 | 1 (0, 1) | Regulation of lipid metabolism enzyme activity | GO:0006085 | 10.1073/pnas.1806635115; 10.1002/jcp.25954 |
Baseline characteristics of the study population
| Cases (%) | Controls (%) | χ2/Z | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 209 (70.4) | 185 (71.2) | 0.04 | 0.84 |
| Female | 88 (29.6) | 75 (28.8) | ||
| Age (years) | 45.66 ± 11.764 | 45.48 ± 11.804 | − 0.16 | 0.87 |
| Primary education | 63 (21.2) | 55 (21.2) | 1.97 | 0.37 |
| Secondary education | 88 (29.6) | 64 (24.6) | ||
| Bachelor degree | 146 (49.2) | 141 (54.2) | ||
| Single | 31 (10.4) | 36 (13.8) | 1.52 | 0.22 |
| Married or divorced | 266 (89.6) | 224 (86.2) | ||
| < 1000 | 16 (5.4) | 15 (5.8) | 0.36 | 0.83 |
| 1000–2000 | 83 (27.9) | 78 (30) | ||
| ≥ 2000 | 198 (66.7) | 167 (64.2) | ||
| < 18.5 | 2 (0.7) | 9 (3.5) | 117.95 | |
| 18.5–23.9 | 99 (33.3) | 193 (74.2) | ||
| 24.0–27.9 | 149 (50.2) | 57 (21.9) | ||
| ≥ 28 | 47 (15.8) | 1 (0.4) | ||
| < 140/90 | 211 (71) | 211 (81.2) | 7.72 | |
| ≥ 140/90 | 86 (29) | 49 (18.8) | ||
| Yes | 12 (4) | 7 (97.3) | 0.77 | 0.38 |
| No | 285 (96) | 253 (2.7) | ||
| No | 112 (37.7) | 109 (41.9) | 1.03 | 0.311 |
| Yes | 185 (62.3) | 151 (58.1) | ||
| No | 220 (74.1) | 197 (75.8) | 0.21 | 0.65 |
| Yes | 77 (25.9) | 63 (24.2) |
Bold indicates that the analysis result is statistically significant
Clinical characteristics of NAFLD patients and normal controls
| Characteristics | Cases (%) | Controls (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT (IU/l) | 27 (19–38) | 19 (14–27) | − 7.91 | |
| AST (IU/l) | 23 (20–28) | 20 (18–24) | − 5.59 | |
| GLU (mmol/l) | 5.34 (4.97–5.87) | 5.19 (4.91–5.52) | − 3.34 | |
| TC (mmol/l) | 5.09 (4.49–5.65) | 5.03 (4.56–5.45) | − 0.94 | 0.35 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.77 (1.26–2.51) | 1.18 (0.87–1.55) | − 9.50 | |
| HDL (mmol/l) | 3.13 (2.53–3.75) | 3.19 (2.687–3.56) | − 0.49 | 0.62 |
| LDL (mmol/l) | 1.21 (1.06–1.37) | 1.35 (1.20–1.47) | − 6.70 |
Bold indicates that the analysis result is statistically significant
AST serum aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase, GGT gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase, FBG serum fasting glucose, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein
Relationship between NLRP4 gene copy number variation and the risk of NAFLD
| Group | One copy | Two copies | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||
| Cases | 15 (5.1) | 282 (94.9) | 5.19 (0.02) | 3.40 (1.12–10.39) | 4.49 (1.3–15.52) |
| Controls | 4 (1.5) | 256 (98.5) | |||
Model 1: unadjusted model
Model 2: adjusted for gender, age, blood pressure, BMI, Diabetes history
Fig. 4Copy number distribution of the NLRP4 gene (Because the copy number analysis software (copy caller) has a limit on the number of samples in each analysis, all the experimental samples were randomly grouped and analyzed in three times, and finally three figures were obtained: Figure a, b, c)