Literature DB >> 33852151

Accuracy of High-Resolution Manometry in Hiatal Hernia Diagnosis in Primary and Revision Bariatric Surgery.

Daniel L Chan1,2,3,4, Tien Y Chern5,6, Jim Iliopoulos5,7,6, Annemarie Hennessy7, Simon K H Wong8, Enders K W Ng8, Michael L Talbot5,7,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a complex association between obesity, hiatal hernia (HH), and reflux. There is a deficiency of literature on the accuracy of preoperative high-resolution manometry (HRM) in detecting HH before both primary and revision bariatric surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all HRM performed before bariatric surgery from 2014 to 2019. An electronic medical records review was conducted. Sensitivity, specificity, and global diagnostic test accuracy were calculated.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients with HRM (mean age of 44.0 ± 11.3 years, body mass index 40.8 ± 6.9 kg/m2) were eligible. Intraoperative diagnosis of HH was made in 37 patients (55.2% prevalence). The HRM sensitivity was 48.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 31.9-65.6%), specificity 90.0% (95% CI 73.5-97.9%), and accuracy was 67.2% (95% CI 54.6-78.2%). Comparing primary (28) and revision (39) surgery, the sensitivity (37.5% vs 57.1%), specificity (75.0% vs 100%), and diagnostic accuracy (54.3% vs 76.3%) were comparable, with overlapping 95% CI. Endoscopy performed in 30 patients had a sensitivity of 25.5% (95% CI 6.8-49.9%), specificity of 100% (95% CI 75.3-100%), and accuracy of 57.8% (95% CI 38.5-75.5%) and was comparable to HRM.
CONCLUSION: High-resolution manometry for the detection of HH before bariatric surgery has a high specificity and maintains a high accuracy in both primary and revision bariatric surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Bariatric surgery; Hiatal hernia; Manometry; Obesity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33852151     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05335-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of X-ray, endoscopy, and high-resolution manometry for hiatal hernia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lunan Li; Huiqin Gao; Chenjing Zhang; Jiangfeng Tu; Xiaoge Geng; Jingya Wang; Xiaolu Zhou; Wensheng Pan; Jiyong Jing
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.029

2.  Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications.

Authors:  P F Griner; R J Mayewski; A I Mushlin; P Greenland
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Accuracy of hiatal hernia diagnosis in bariatric patients: Preoperative endoscopy versus intraoperative reference.

Authors:  Daniel L Chan; Simon K-H Wong; Hon Ting Lok; Jim Iliopoulos; Michael L Talbot; Annemarie Hennessy; Enders K-W Ng
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2020-07-30

4.  Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Šimundić
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.