Literature DB >> 33852145

Prevalence of and factors associated with physical restraint use in the intensive care unit: a multicenter prospective observational study in Japan.

Yusuke Kawai1, Miya Hamamoto2, Atsuko Miura3, Mayumi Yamaguchi4, Yukari Masuda5, Maiko Iwata6, Miki Kanbe7, Yuko Ikematsu8.   

Abstract

Physical restraint is widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to ensure patient safety despite its ethical implications. We performed a prospective observational study in six ICUs in Japan to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical restraint use in the ICU, a phenomenon that has not yet been reported on in Japan. Data were collected on 10 random days between November 2018 and February 2019. We evaluated physical restraint use in ICU patients aged ≥ 20 years during the data collection days. Among the 787 observations, the prevalence of physical restraint use was 32.9%; however, it was 41.5% in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). The average age of patients was 68.5 years, and the average Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 19.4. Among the included patients, 52.1% received IMV, and 17.2% were diagnosed with delirium. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent factors [odds ratio (95% confidence interval)] associated with physical restraint use were age [1.02 (1.00-1.05)], APACHE II score [1.05 (1.01-1.09)], IMV [2.15 (1.16-4.01)], central venous catheter indwelling [2.66 (1.46-4.85)], sedative medication [2.98 (1.72-5.17)], agitation [7.83 (2.96-20.8)], and delirium [4.16 (2.37-7.29)]. Approximately one-third of the ICU patients required physical restraint in Japan. In addition, physical restraint use was influenced by disease severity, mental condition, and the medical apparatus used. Based on these findings, further investigations are imperative to develop strategies to reduce physical restraint use.
© 2021. Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associated factors; Intensive care unit (ICU); Physical restraint; Prevalence

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33852145     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-021-02737-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  28 in total

Review 1.  Understanding and reducing disability in older adults following critical illness.

Authors:  Nathan E Brummel; Michele C Balas; Alessandro Morandi; Lauren E Ferrante; Thomas M Gill; E Wesley Ely
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Physical restraint use in intensive care units across Europe: the PRICE study.

Authors:  Julie Benbenbishty; Sheila Adam; Ruth Endacott
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.072

3.  Precipitants of post-traumatic stress disorder following intensive care: a hypothesis generating study of diversity in care.

Authors:  C Jones; C Bäckman; M Capuzzo; H Flaatten; C Rylander; R D Griffiths
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of delirium in mechanically ventilated adults.

Authors:  Sangeeta Mehta; Deborah Cook; John W Devlin; Yoanna Skrobik; Maureen Meade; Dean Fergusson; Margaret Herridge; Marilyn Steinberg; John Granton; Niall Ferguson; Maged Tanios; Peter Dodek; Robert Fowler; Karen Burns; Michael Jacka; Kendiss Olafson; Ranjeeta Mallick; Steven Reynolds; Sean Keenan; Lisa Burry
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Extrinsic risk factors for pressure ulcers early in the hospital stay: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Mona Baumgarten; David J Margolis; A Russell Localio; Sarah H Kagan; Robert A Lowe; Bruce Kinosian; Stephanie B Abbuhl; William Kavesh; John H Holmes; Althea Ruffin; Tesfa Mehari
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 6.  Clinical practice guidelines for the maintenance of patient physical safety in the intensive care unit: use of restraining therapies--American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2001-2002.

Authors:  Gerald A Maccioli; Todd Dorman; Brent R Brown; John E Mazuski; Barbara A McLean; Joanne M Kuszaj; Stanley H Rosenbaum; Lorry R Frankel; John W Devlin; Joseph A Govert; Brian Smith; William T Peruzzi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Use of physical restraints in Dutch intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Arendina W van der Kooi; Linda M Peelen; Rosa J Raijmakers; Renée L Vroegop; Danique F Bakker; Hilâl Tekatli; Mark van den Boogaard; Arjen J C Slooter
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.228

8.  Physical restraints practice in adult intensive care units in Egypt.

Authors:  Nahed Attia Kandeel; Amal Kadry Attia
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.857

9.  Patient comfort in the intensive care unit: a multicentre, binational point prevalence study of analgesia, sedation and delirium management.

Authors:  Doug Elliott; Leanne M Aitken; Tracey K Bucknall; Ian M Seppelt; Steven A R Webb; Leonie Weisbrodt; Sharon McKinley
Journal:  Crit Care Resusc       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Risk factors for delirium in intensive care patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bart Van Rompaey; Monique M Elseviers; Marieke J Schuurmans; Lillie M Shortridge-Baggett; Steven Truijen; Leo Bossaert
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.