| Literature DB >> 33851533 |
Alex T Ford1, Marlene Ågerstrand2, Bryan W Brooks3,4, Joel Allen5, Michael G Bertram6, Tomas Brodin6, ZhiChao Dang7, Sabine Duquesne8, René Sahm8, Frauke Hoffmann9, Henner Hollert10, Stefanie Jacob8, Nils Klüver11, James M Lazorchak5, Mariana Ledesma12, Steven D Melvin13, Silvia Mohr8, Stephanie Padilla14, Gregory G Pyle15, Stefan Scholz12, Minna Saaristo16, Els Smit7, Jeffery A Steevens17, Sanne van den Berg18, Werner Kloas19, Bob B M Wong20, Michael Ziegler21, Gerd Maack8.
Abstract
For decades, we have known that chemicals affect human and wildlife behavior. Moreover, due to recent technological and computational advances, scientists are now increasingly aware that a wide variety of contaminants and other environmental stressors adversely affect organismal behavior and subsequent ecological outcomes in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. There is also a groundswell of concern that regulatory ecotoxicology does not adequately consider behavior, primarily due to a lack of standardized toxicity methods. This has, in turn, led to the exclusion of many behavioral ecotoxicology studies from chemical risk assessments. To improve understanding of the challenges and opportunities for behavioral ecotoxicology within regulatory toxicology/risk assessment, a unique workshop with international representatives from the fields of behavioral ecology, ecotoxicology, regulatory (eco)toxicology, neurotoxicology, test standardization, and risk assessment resulted in the formation of consensus perspectives and recommendations, which promise to serve as a roadmap to advance interfaces among the basic and translational sciences, and regulatory practices.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33851533 PMCID: PMC8935421 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Technol ISSN: 0013-936X Impact factor: 9.028