Literature DB >> 33850298

ABCC4 single-nucleotide polymorphisms as markers of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-induced kidney impairment.

Stefania Cheli1, Sara Baldelli1, Annalisa De Silvestri2, Marta Fusi1, Davide Minisci3, Cristina Gervasoni3,4, Dario Cattaneo1,4, Emilio Clementi5,6, Paola Meraviglia3, Cristina Montrasio7.   

Abstract

Recently, the use of antiretroviral drug tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is increased, thanks to the new co-formulation with doravirine, the availability of booster-free regimens, and its advantageous lipid-lowering effect. The aim of our study was to identify genetic markers that contribute to assess the risk of TDF-related renal toxicity. We have retrospectively investigated, in 179 HIV positive patients treated with TDF, the association between the main variants in ABCC2, ABCC4, and ABCC10 genes and four safety endpoints, three clinically relevant as renal outcomes and a higher tenofovir plasma concentration. In patients with an annual eGFR decline >5 mL/min/1.73 m2 a difference in genotype frequencies was observed for ABCC10 c.1875 + 526 G>A (3 subjects AA vs. 44 GG + GA, p = 0.045). In patients with an eGFR decrement >25%, plus a decline in GFR category and TDF discontinuation, a difference was observed for ABCC4 c.*38T>G (35 subjects TG + GG vs. 18 TT, p = 0.052). At univariate analysis OR was 1.39 [(95% CI 1.00-1.96) p = 0.054] and at multivariate analysis OR was 1.49 [(95% CI 1.00-2.22) p = 0.049]. The stronger associations were found between the tenofovir accumulation and ABCC4 c.*38T>G and c.3348G>A: the percentage of these patients was higher in the TG + GG (p = 0.011) and in the AA (p = 0.004) genotype, respectively. The logistic regression analysis confirmed these significant relationships. No significant association was observed in patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and with the studied ABCC2 polymorphisms. Our results show a major role for a combined determination of ABCC4/ABCC10 variants as an indicator of tenofovir toxicity in the clinical practice.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33850298     DOI: 10.1038/s41397-021-00235-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J        ISSN: 1470-269X            Impact factor:   3.550


  23 in total

1.  Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate discontinuation for renal outcomes: any room for treatment personalization?

Authors:  A Calcagno; M Fiumanò; D Zugna; J Cusato; C Montrucchio; L Marinaro; L Trentini; M Ferrara; A D'Avolio; C Pizzi; G Di Perri; S Bonora
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.550

2.  Switching from Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate to Tenofovir Alafenamide Significantly Worsens the Lipid Profile in a Real-World Setting.

Authors:  Kai Juhani Kauppinen; Pia Kivelä; Jussi Sutinen
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.078

3.  Genetic variants of ABCC10, a novel tenofovir transporter, are associated with kidney tubular dysfunction.

Authors:  Sudeep P Pushpakom; Neill J Liptrott; Sonia Rodríguez-Nóvoa; Pablo Labarga; Vincent Soriano; Marta Albalater; Elizabeth Hopper-Borge; Stefano Bonora; Giovanni Di Perri; David J Back; Saye Khoo; Munir Pirmohamed; Andrew Owen
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Influence of ABCC2 and ABCC4 polymorphisms on tenofovir plasma concentrations in Thai HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  Kanokrat Rungtivasuwan; Anchalee Avihingsanon; Narukjaporn Thammajaruk; Siwaporn Mitruk; David M Burger; Kiat Ruxrungtham; Baralee Punyawudho; Thitima Pengsuparp
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Tenofovir renal toxicity targets mitochondria of renal proximal tubules.

Authors:  James J Kohler; Seyed H Hosseini; Amy Hoying-Brandt; Elgin Green; David M Johnson; Rodney Russ; Dung Tran; C Michael Raper; Robert Santoianni; William Lewis
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.662

6.  Predictors of kidney tubular dysfunction in HIV-infected patients treated with tenofovir: a pharmacogenetic study.

Authors:  Sonia Rodríguez-Nóvoa; Pablo Labarga; Vincent Soriano; Deirdre Egan; Marta Albalater; Judit Morello; Lorena Cuenca; Gema González-Pardo; Saye Khoo; David Back; Andrew Owen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Tenofovir alafenamide vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate: an updated meta-analysis of 14 894 patients across 14 trials.

Authors:  Victoria Pilkington; Sophie L Hughes; Toby Pepperrell; Kaitlyn McCann; Dzintars Gotham; Anton L Pozniak; Andrew Hill
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 8.  Clinical Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Drug Interaction Profile of Doravirine.

Authors:  Alison Boyle; Catherine E Moss; Catia Marzolini; Saye Khoo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  The role of drug transporters in the kidney: lessons from tenofovir.

Authors:  Darren M Moss; Megan Neary; Andrew Owen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 10.  A Review and Clinical Understanding of Tenofovir: Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate versus Tenofovir Alafenamide.

Authors:  Chanie Wassner; Nicole Bradley; Yuman Lee
Journal:  J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.