Literature DB >> 33850286

Are small-for-gestational-age preterm infants at increased risk of overweight? Statistical pitfalls in overadjusting for body size measures.

Seham Elmrayed1, Amy Metcalfe2, Darren Brenner2, Krista Wollny2, Tanis R Fenton2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of adjusting for body measures on the association between small for gestational age (SGA) and overweight at 3 years. STUDY
DESIGN: Data were obtained from the Preterm Infant Multicenter Growth Study (n = 1089). Logistic regression was used, to adjust for confounders with additional adjustments separately for weight and height at 21 months. Marginal structural models (MSMs) estimated the direct effect of SGA on overweight.
RESULTS: The crude and adjusted for confounders models yielded null associations between SGA and overweight. Adjusting for height yielded a positive association (odds ratio (OR): 2.31, 95% CI: 0.52-10.26) and adjusting for weight provided a significantly positive association (OR: 6.60, 95% CI: 1.10-37.14). The MSMs, with height and weight held constant, provided no evidence for a direct effect of SGA on overweight (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.14-5.01, OR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.18-2.81, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Adjusting for body measures can change the association between SGA and overweight, providing spurious estimates.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33850286     DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01050-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  41 in total

1.  Increased blood pressure in adolescents who were small for gestational age at birth: a cohort study in Brazil.

Authors:  F C Barros; C G Victora
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Invited commentary: association between restricted fetal growth and adult chronic disease: is it causal? Is it important?

Authors:  M S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Why evidence for the fetal origins of adult disease might be a statistical artifact: the "reversal paradox" for the relation between birth weight and blood pressure in later life.

Authors:  Yu-Kang Tu; Robert West; George T H Ellison; Mark S Gilthorpe
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Unravelling the fetal origins hypothesis: is there really an inverse association between birthweight and subsequent blood pressure?

Authors:  Rachel Huxley; Andrew Neil; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-08-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Early nutritional origins of hypertension: a hypothesis still lacking support.

Authors:  N Paneth; F Ahmed; A D Stein
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1996-12

Review 6.  Long-Term Health Impact of Early Nutrition: The Power of Programming.

Authors:  Berthold Koletzko; Brigitte Brands; Veit Grote; Franca F Kirchberg; Christine Prell; Peter Rzehak; Olaf Uhl; Martina Weber
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.374

7.  Does Fetal Growth Restriction Cause Later Obesity? Pitfalls in Analyzing Causal Mediators as Confounders.

Authors:  Michael S Kramer; Xun Zhang; Mourad Dahhou; Seungmi Yang; Richard M Martin; Emily Oken; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 8.  The origins of the developmental origins theory.

Authors:  D J P Barker
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  Fetal origins of adult disease-the hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  A Lucas; M S Fewtrell; T J Cole
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-24

10.  The long-term impact of intrauterine growth restriction in a diverse U.S. cohort of children: the EPOCH study.

Authors:  Tessa L Crume; Ann Scherzinger; Elizabeth Stamm; Robert McDuffie; Kimberly J Bischoff; Richard F Hamman; Dana Dabelea
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 5.002

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.