Xaver Feichtinger1,2,3,4, Patrick Heimel5,6,7, Claudia Keibl5,6, David Hercher5,6, Jakob Emanuel Schanda5,8,6, Roland Kocijan9,10, Heinz Redl5,6, Johannes Grillari5,6, Christian Fialka8,10, Rainer Mittermayr5,8,6,10. 1. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria. xaver.feichtinger@gmail.com. 2. AUVA Trauma Center Vienna - Meidling, Vienna, Austria. xaver.feichtinger@gmail.com. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery II, Herz-Jesu Hospital, Vienna, Austria. xaver.feichtinger@gmail.com. 4. Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria. xaver.feichtinger@gmail.com. 5. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Vienna, Austria. 6. Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria. 7. Karl Donath Laboratory for Hard Tissue and Biomaterial Research, Department of Oral Surgery, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 8. AUVA Trauma Center Vienna - Meidling, Vienna, Austria. 9. Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Osteology, 1st Medical Department at Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria. 10. Center for the Musculoskeletal System, Medical Faculty, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether rodent shoulder specimens fixed in formaldehyde for histological and histomorphometric investigations and specimens stained using Lugol's solution for soft tissue visualization by micro-computed tomography (microCT) are still eligible to be used for bone architecture analysis by microCT. METHODS: In this controlled laboratory study, 11 male Sprague-Dawley rats were used. After sacrifice and exarticulation both shoulders of healthy rats were assigned into three groups: (A) control group (n = 2); (B) formaldehyde group (n = 4); (C) Lugol group (n = 5). Half of the specimens of groups B and C were placed in a 4% buffered formaldehyde or Lugol's solution for 24 h, whereas the contralateral sides and all specimens of group A were stored without any additives. MicroCT of both sides performed in all specimens focused on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microstructure parameters. RESULTS: BMD measurements revealed higher values in specimens after placement in Lugol's solution (p < 0.05). Bone microstructure analyses showed increased BV/TV and Tb.Th values in group C (p < 0.05). Specimens of group C resulted in clearly decreased Tb.Sp values (p < 0.05) in comparison to the control group. Formaldehyde fixation showed minimally altered BMD and bone microstructure measurements without reaching any significance. CONCLUSIONS: MicroCT scans of bone structures are recommended to be conducted natively and immediately after euthanizing rats. MicroCT scans of formaldehyde-fixed specimens must be performed with caution due to a possible slight shift of absolute values of BMD and bone microstructure. Bone analysis of specimens stained by Lugol's solution cannot be recommended.
BACKGROUND: <span class="Chemical">This study aimed to investigate whether rodent shoulder specimens fixed in formaldehyde for histological and histomorphometric investigations and specimens stained using Lugol's solution for soft tissue visualization by micro-computed tomography (microCT) are still eligible to be used for bone architecture analysis by microCT. METHODS: In this controlled laboratory study, 11 male Sprague-Dawley rats were used. After sacrifice and exarticulation both shoulders of healthy rats were assigned into three groups: (A) control group (n = 2); (B) formaldehyde group (n = 4); (C) Lugol group (n = 5). Half of the specimens of groups B and C were placed in a 4% buffered formaldehyde or Lugol's solution for 24 h, whereas the contralateral sides and all specimens of group A were stored without any additives. MicroCT of both sides performed in all specimens focused on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microstructure parameters. RESULTS:BMD measurements revealed higher values in specimens after placement in Lugol's solution (p < 0.05). Bone microstructure analyses showed increased BV/TV and Tb.Th values in group C (p < 0.05). Specimens of group C resulted in clearly decreased Tb.Sp values (p < 0.05) in comparison to the control group. Formaldehyde fixation showed minimally altered BMD and bone microstructure measurements without reaching any significance. CONCLUSIONS: MicroCT scans of bone structures are recommended to be conducted natively and immediately after euthanizing rats. MicroCT scans of formaldehyde-fixed specimens must be performed with caution due to a possible slight shift of absolute values of BMD and bone microstructure. Bone analysis of specimens stained by Lugol's solution cannot be recommended.
Authors: Shivam A Shah; Ioannis Kormpakis; Necat Havlioglu; Michael S Ominsky; Leesa M Galatz; Stavros Thomopoulos Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Megan L Killian; Leonardo M Cavinatto; Samuel R Ward; Necat Havlioglu; Stavros Thomopoulos; Leesa M Galatz Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Xaver Feichtinger; Xavier Monforte; Claudia Keibl; David Hercher; Jakob Schanda; Andreas H Teuschl; Christian Muschitz; Heinz Redl; Christian Fialka; Rainer Mittermayr Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Volker Braunstein; Stefan Milz; Christoph M Sprecher; Florian Fischer; Andrea Tami; Philipp Ahrens; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Hinterwimmer Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2010-01-31 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Tracy M Hopkins; Alexander M Heilman; James A Liggett; Kathleen LaSance; Kevin J Little; David B Hom; Danielle M Minteer; Kacey G Marra; Sarah K Pixley Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Carolyn M Hettrich; Selom Gasinu; Brandon S Beamer; Mark Stasiak; Alice Fox; Patrick Birmingham; Olivia Ying; Xiang-Hua Deng; Scott A Rodeo Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Xaver Feichtinger; Patrick Heimel; Stefan Tangl; Claudia Keibl; Sylvia Nürnberger; Jakob Emanuel Schanda; David Hercher; Roland Kocijan; Heinz Redl; Johannes Grillari; Christian Fialka; Rainer Mittermayr Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 3.240