Literature DB >> 33849561

Intra-mammary lymph nodes, an overlooked breast cancer prognostic tool?

Tarek Hashem1,2, Ahmed Abdelmoez3, Ahmed Mohamed Rozeka4, Hazem Abdelazeem5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the high variability of incidence and prevalence of intra-mammary lymph nodes (IMLNs), they might be overlooked during clinical and radiological examinations. Properly characterizing pathological IMLNs and detecting the factors that might influence their prevalence in different stages of breast cancer might aid in proper therapeutic decision-making and could be of possible prognostic value.
METHODS: Medical records were reviewed for all breast cancer patients treated at the National Cancer Institute of Cairo University between 2013 and 2019. Radiological, pathological, and surgical data were studied.
RESULTS: Intra-mammary lymph nodes were described in the final pathology reports of 100 patients. Five cases had benign breast lesion. Three cases had phyllodes tumors and two cases had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). All ten cases were excluded. The remaining 90 cases all had invasive breast cancer and were divided into two groups: one group for patients with malignant IMLNs (48) and another for patients with benign IMLNs (42). Pathological features of the malignant IMLN group included larger mean tumor size in pathology (4.7 cm), larger mean size of the IMLN in pathology (1.7 cm), higher incidence of lympho-vascular invasion (65.9%), and higher rate of extracapsular extension in axillary lymph nodes (57.4%). In addition, the pathological N stage was significantly higher in the malignant IMLN group.
CONCLUSION: Clinicians frequently overlook intra-mammary lymph nodes. More effort should be performed to detect them during preoperative imaging and during pathological processing of specimens. A suspicious IMLN should undergo a percutaneous biopsy. Malignant IMLNs are associated with advanced pathological features and should be removed during surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axillary lymph nodes; Breast cancer; Intra-mammary lymph nodes

Year:  2021        PMID: 33849561     DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02219-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1477-7819            Impact factor:   2.754


  11 in total

1.  Intramammary lymph nodes and breast cancer: a marker for disease severity, or just another lymph node?

Authors:  Amber A Guth; Cecilia Mercado; Daniel F Roses; Karen Hiotis; Kristin Skinner; Thomas Diflo; Joan Cangiarella
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The clinical meaning of intramammary lymph nodes.

Authors:  Se Kyung Lee; Sangmin Kim; Min-Young Choi; Jiyoung Kim; Jeonghui Lee; Seung Pil Jung; Jun-Ho Choe; Jung-Han Kim; Jee Soo Kim; Won Ho Kil; Jeong Eon Lee; Seok Jin Nam
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 2.935

3.  Lymphatic mapping of the breast: locating the sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  R F Uren; R Howman-Giles; S B Renwick; D Gillett
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-05-14       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Metastatic intramammary lymph nodes: mammographic and ultrasonographic features.

Authors:  I Günhan-Bilgen; A Memiş; E E Ustün
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  A positive intramammary lymph node does not mandate a complete axillary node dissection.

Authors:  Ricardo Diaz; Amy C Degnim; Judy C Boughey; Aziza Nassar; James W Jakub
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Intramammary lymph node metastases are an independent predictor of poor outcome in patients with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeannie Shen; Kelly K Hunt; Nadeem Q Mirza; Savitri Krishnamurthy; S Eva Singletary; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Barry Feig; Merrick I Ross; Frederick C Ames; Gildy V Babiera
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  When sentinel lymph node is intramammary.

Authors:  Mattia Intra; Carlos A Garcia-Etienne; Giuseppe Renne; Giuseppe Trifirò; Nicole Rotmensz; Oreste D Gentilini; Viviana Galimberti; Andrea Sagona; Denise Mattar; Claudia Sangalli; Giovanna Gatti; Alberto Luini; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Metastases to intramammary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: sonographic findings.

Authors:  Beth S Edeiken-Monroe; Douglas P Monroe; Brett J Monroe; Kristine Arnljot; Maria Giaccomazza; Nour Sneige; Bruno D Fornage
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.910

9.  Intramammary lymph nodes: patterns of discovery and clinical significance.

Authors:  Sandeep S Vijan; Steven Hamilton; Beiyun Chen; Carol Reynolds; Judy C Boughey; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Intramammary sentinel lymph nodes: what is the clinical significance?

Authors:  Charles E Cox; John M Cox; Daniel Ramos; Tammi L Meade
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  2 in total

1.  Over-expression of SRD5A3 and its prognostic significance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yong-Ping Zhang; Wen-Ting Na; Xiao-Qiang Dai; Ruo-Fei Li; Jian-Xiong Wang; Ting Gao; Wei-Bo Zhang; Cheng Xiang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  False-negative frozen section of sentinel nodes in early breast cancer (cT1-2N0) patients.

Authors:  Zhu-Jun Loh; Kuo-Ting Lee; Ya-Ping Chen; Yao-Lung Kuo; Wei-Pang Chung; Ya-Ting Hsu; Chien-Chang Huang; Hui-Ping Hsu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.754

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.