Literature DB >> 33849506

Psychological distance: a qualitative study of screening barriers among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

Xueying Zhang1, Yiheng Zhang1, Jingyu Chen1, Meifen Zhang2, Ni Gong3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening can reduce the incidence and mortality through early detection. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with colorectal cancer are at high risk for colorectal cancer and therefore require colonoscopy. However, despite the high risk, screening adherence among FDRs remains low and the barriers to undergoing screening among FDRs in China are not clear. We explored the reasons why FDRs refused screening.
METHODS: In this qualitative study, 28 semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted face-to-face. Participants were recruited at two hospitals (an urban tertiary hospital and a community health center) in Guangzhou, South China. We used qualitative content analysis to analyze transcripts based on audio recordings and identify major themes and subthemes.
RESULTS: Three major themes emerged related to FDRs' low screening participation. First, the emotional distance between FDRs and medicine was pulled away by uncomfortable feelings approaching hospitals and misunderstanding of cancer. Second, they confirmed their health state and minimized cancer risk if they had no signs in routine health examination, no symptoms and maintained a healthy, happy life. Third, they considered screening far from their daily life from the perspective of spatial distance and priority. Therefore, screening was not necessary in their view.
CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals should narrow psychological distance between people and screening when promoting screening technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; First degree relatives; Medical technology; Qualitative research; Screening barriers

Year:  2021        PMID: 33849506     DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10786-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  38 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Carol Desantis; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  [Report of cancer epidemiology in China, 2015].

Authors:  R S Zheng; K X Sun; S W Zhang; H M Zeng; X N Zou; R Chen; X Y Gu; W W Wei; J He
Journal:  Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi       Date:  2019-01-23

3.  Advanced-Stage Colorectal Cancer in Persons Younger Than 50 Years Not Associated With Longer Duration of Symptoms or Time to Diagnosis.

Authors:  Frank W Chen; Vandana Sundaram; Thomas A Chew; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Evelien Dekker; Pieter J Tanis; Jasper L A Vleugels; Pashtoon M Kasi; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Afsaneh Barzi; Heinz-Josef Lenz; David I Quinn; Sarmad Sadeghi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Matthias Kloor; Christian Peter Pox
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Effects of Family History on Relative and Absolute Risks for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Victorine H Roos; Carolina Mangas-Sanjuan; Mar Rodriguez-Girondo; Lucia Medina-Prado; Ewout W Steyerberg; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker; Rodrigo Jover; Monique E van Leerdam
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Long term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 17 years of follow-up: the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Wendy Atkin; Kate Wooldrage; D Maxwell Parkin; Ines Kralj-Hans; Eilidh MacRae; Urvi Shah; Stephen Duffy; Amanda J Cross
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.