Kamran Mahmood1, Momen M Wahidi1, Ray Wes Shepherd2, A Christine Argento3, Lonny B Yarmus4, Hans Lee4, Samira Shojaee2, David M Berkowitz5, Keriann Van Nostrand5, Carla R Lamb6, Scott L Shofer1, Junheng Gao7, Mohsen Davoudi8. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 2. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, Interventional Pulmonology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 6. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA. 7. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 8. Beckman Laser Institute, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite increased use of rigid bronchoscopy (RB) for therapeutic indications and recommendations from professional societies to use performance-based competency, an assessment tool has not been utilized to measure the competency of trainees to perform RB in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate a previously developed assessment tool - Rigid Bronchoscopy Tool for Assessment of Skills and Competence (RIGID-TASC) - for determining the RB learning curve of interventional pulmonary (IP) trainees in the clinical setting and explore the variability of learning curve of trainees. METHODS: IP fellows at 4 institutions were enrolled. After preclinical simulation training, all RBs performed in patients were scored by faculty using RIGID-TASC until competency threshold was achieved. Competency threshold was defined as unassisted RB intubation and navigation through the central airways on 3 consecutive patients at the first attempt with a minimum score of 89. A regression-based model was devised to construct and compare the learning curves. RESULTS: Twelve IP fellows performed 178 RBs. Trainees reached the competency threshold between 5 and 24 RBs, with a median of 15 RBs (95% CI, 6-21). There were differences among trainees in learning curve parameters including starting point, slope, and inflection point, as demonstrated by the curve-fitting model. Subtasks that required the highest number of procedures (median = 10) to gain competency included ability to intubate at the first attempt and intubation time of <60 s. CONCLUSIONS: Trainees acquire RB skills at a variable pace, and RIGID-TASC can be used to assess learning curve of IP trainees in clinical settings.
BACKGROUND: Despite increased use of rigid bronchoscopy (RB) for therapeutic indications and recommendations from professional societies to use performance-based competency, an assessment tool has not been utilized to measure the competency of trainees to perform RB in clinical settings. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate a previously developed assessment tool - Rigid Bronchoscopy Tool for Assessment of Skills and Competence (RIGID-TASC) - for determining the RB learning curve of interventional pulmonary (IP) trainees in the clinical setting and explore the variability of learning curve of trainees. METHODS: IP fellows at 4 institutions were enrolled. After preclinical simulation training, all RBs performed in patients were scored by faculty using RIGID-TASC until competency threshold was achieved. Competency threshold was defined as unassisted RB intubation and navigation through the central airways on 3 consecutive patients at the first attempt with a minimum score of 89. A regression-based model was devised to construct and compare the learning curves. RESULTS: Twelve IP fellows performed 178 RBs. Trainees reached the competency threshold between 5 and 24 RBs, with a median of 15 RBs (95% CI, 6-21). There were differences among trainees in learning curve parameters including starting point, slope, and inflection point, as demonstrated by the curve-fitting model. Subtasks that required the highest number of procedures (median = 10) to gain competency included ability to intubate at the first attempt and intubation time of <60 s. CONCLUSIONS: Trainees acquire RB skills at a variable pace, and RIGID-TASC can be used to assess learning curve of IP trainees in clinical settings.
Authors: Hans J Lee; A Christine Argento; Hitesh Batra; Sadia Benzaquen; Kyle Bramley; David Chambers; Neeraj Desai; H Erhan Dincer; J Scott Ferguson; Satish Kalanjeri; Carla Lamb; Nikhil Meena; Chakravarthy Reddy; Alberto Revelo; Ashutosh Sachdeva; Benjamin Seides; Harsh Shah; Samira Shojaee; David Sonetti; Jeffrey Thiboutot; Jennifer Toth; Keriann Van Nostrand; Jason A Akulian Journal: ATS Sch Date: 2022-06-30